Apologies, I sent this to KB's direct mailbox earlier today and apparently I didn't send it to centos-devel. So I'm forwarding it now.
Given that there are at least two other projects keen to make this happen, it would be great if the Cloud SIG could be a single multicloud target.
--
Hello,
I'm Jaime Melis from the OpenNebula project [1]. We have been involved with CentOS for the past year making a stable Cloud Management Platform [2]. I would like to hereby propose a new CentOS variant, namely the OpenNebula variant.
This variant would add three roles to the CentOS installation:
* OpenNebula Frontend * OpenNebula Node KVM * OpenNebula Node Xen
The work for the Frontend and Node KVM roles has been completed and is ready to be released. The Node Xen role is still in progress although close to being finished.
This work should take place under the Cloud SIG umbrella, which right as of now doesn't exist, so I would like to also propose the creation of this group with the aim of making the major cloud platforms work wth Centos.
Regards, Jaime
[1] http://opennebula.org/ [2] http://wiki.centos.org/Cloud/OpenNebula/QuickStart
Apologies, I sent this to KB's direct mailbox earlier today and apparently I didn't send it to centos-devel. So I'm forwarding it now.
Given that there are at least two other projects keen to make this happen, it would be great if the Cloud SIG could be a single multicloud target.
--
Hello,
I'm Jaime Melis from the OpenNebula project [1]. We have been involved with CentOS for the past year making a stable Cloud Management Platform [2]. I would like to hereby propose a new CentOS variant, namely the OpenNebula variant.
This variant would add three roles to the CentOS installation:
- OpenNebula Frontend
- OpenNebula Node KVM
- OpenNebula Node Xen
The work for the Frontend and Node KVM roles has been completed and is ready to be released. The Node Xen role is still in progress although close to being finished.
This work should take place under the Cloud SIG umbrella, which right as of now doesn't exist, so I would like to also propose the creation of this group with the aim of making the major cloud platforms work wth Centos.
Regards, Jaime
[1] http://opennebula.org/ [2] http://wiki.centos.org/Cloud/OpenNebula/QuickStart
Hi,
I would like to help on this one. I also think good Gluster integration with Opennebula might be something to look at.
Regards,
On 01/09/2014 08:34 AM, Vincent Van der Kussen wrote:
would like to hereby propose a new CentOS variant, namely the OpenNebula variant.
I wonder if this might be a Variant that could be hosted/built within the Cloud SIG ( or Cloud Infra SIG ). Given that we already have the packages for ON-4.4 in the process, we might even be able to use those as a trial run for the variant build.
I would like to help on this one. I also think good Gluster integration with Opennebula might be something to look at.
do you mean via the ufo / object backing store ? I would have thought the regular fuse-driven gluster mounts on the datastore path's would have just worked otherwise.
Regards,
On 01/09/2014 08:34 AM, Vincent Van der Kussen wrote:
would like to hereby propose a new CentOS variant, namely the OpenNebula variant.
I wonder if this might be a Variant that could be hosted/built within the Cloud SIG ( or Cloud Infra SIG ). Given that we already have the packages for ON-4.4 in the process, we might even be able to use those as a trial run for the variant build.
I would like to help on this one. I also think good Gluster integration with Opennebula might be something to look at.
do you mean via the ufo / object backing store ? I would have thought the regular fuse-driven gluster mounts on the datastore path's would have just worked otherwise.
Yes. Normal fuse mounts do indeed work. Apparently there's already a ticket open (http://dev.opennebula.org/issues/2202).
I was also wondering if building packages for the required Gems for Opennebula would be something that could go into the ONE Variant?
Regards,
On 01/12/2014 10:21 AM, Vincent Van der Kussen wrote:
Yes. Normal fuse mounts do indeed work. Apparently there's already a ticket open (http://dev.opennebula.org/issues/2202).
sounds good. I know there are a couple of gluster people on this list, maybe this is something they can pitch in with as well.
I was also wondering if building packages for the required Gems for Opennebula would be something that could go into the ONE Variant?
Absolutely; have you looked at the https://nazar.karan.org/results/opennebula/ repo ? we've got 4.4 and most of the gems pretty much ready to go ( in that, you can use it now, but a couple of things need gems that are not packaged yet ). Fancy having a go ?
Regards
On 01/12/2014 10:21 AM, Vincent Van der Kussen wrote:
Yes. Normal fuse mounts do indeed work. Apparently there's already a ticket open (http://dev.opennebula.org/issues/2202).
sounds good. I know there are a couple of gluster people on this list, maybe this is something they can pitch in with as well.
I was also wondering if building packages for the required Gems for Opennebula would be something that could go into the ONE Variant?
Absolutely; have you looked at the https://nazar.karan.org/results/opennebula/ repo ? we've got 4.4 and most of the gems pretty much ready to go ( in that, you can use it now, but a couple of things need gems that are not packaged yet ). Fancy having a go ?
Sure.
Vincent
Regards
On 01/21/2014 07:20 AM, Vincent Van der Kussen wrote:
Absolutely; have you looked at the https://nazar.karan.org/results/opennebula/ repo ? we've got 4.4 and most of the gems pretty much ready to go ( in that, you can use it now, but a couple of things need gems that are not packaged yet ). Fancy having a go ?
Sure.
This is where we are: http://collabedit.com/4r6hd
Lets sync up on irc, and I'll get you setup with the alt.bsys ( the public facing buildsystem resouces we have at the moment, to be retired soon - but works for now )
- KB
Apologies, I sent this to KB's direct mailbox earlier today and apparently I didn't send it to centos-devel. So I'm forwarding it now.
Given that there are at least two other projects keen to make this happen, it would be great if the Cloud SIG could be a single multicloud target.
--
Hello,
I'm Jaime Melis from the OpenNebula project [1]. We have been involved with CentOS for the past year making a stable Cloud Management Platform [2]. I would like to hereby propose a new CentOS variant, namely the OpenNebula variant.
This variant would add three roles to the CentOS installation:
- OpenNebula Frontend
- OpenNebula Node KVM
- OpenNebula Node Xen
The work for the Frontend and Node KVM roles has been completed and is ready to be released. The Node Xen role is still in progress although close to being finished.
This work should take place under the Cloud SIG umbrella, which right as of now doesn't exist, so I would like to also propose the creation of this group with the aim of making the major cloud platforms work wth Centos.
Regards, Jaime
[1] http://opennebula.org/ [2] http://wiki.centos.org/Cloud/OpenNebula/QuickStart
Hi All,
I'm picking up this rather old thread. I finally might have some free time to work on this.
I can't seem to find earlier conversations about his but i believe the intention was to release something that had everything on board to install Opennebula.
I've a few questions about this :
- at first sight most ruby gems are available through EPEL. Are we going to use that or do we rebuild the gems and add them to a CentOS/opennebula repo ? It might make sense since Opennebula requires specific versions of some gems and prioritize repo's might complicate things.
- Or is the idea to add them (rpms) to the install media? I think most people deploy a minimal install and work from there so it might not be the best option.
-
Jaime Melis -
Karanbir Singh -
Vincent Van der Kussen