hi, is there any way to make the old c7.00.02 and c7.00.00 centos repos available? currently many i686 packages missing from c7.00.03 and c7.00.04, but without these packages none of the i686 packages cab be build. regards.
On 06/20/2014 12:51 PM, Farkas Levente wrote:
hi, is there any way to make the old c7.00.02 and c7.00.00 centos repos available? currently many i686 packages missing from c7.00.03 and c7.00.04, but without these packages none of the i686 packages cab be build. regards.
we can put the c7.00.02 there ... that should have everything required to build everything in the current c7 tree .. we'll get that pushed soon
On 06/20/2014 03:34 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 06/20/2014 12:51 PM, Farkas Levente wrote:
hi, is there any way to make the old c7.00.02 and c7.00.00 centos repos available? currently many i686 packages missing from c7.00.03 and c7.00.04, but without these packages none of the i686 packages cab be build. regards.
we can put the c7.00.02 there ... that should have everything required to build everything in the current c7 tree .. we'll get that pushed soon
OK, Its there (c7.00.02)
On 06/20/2014 11:18 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 06/20/2014 03:34 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 06/20/2014 12:51 PM, Farkas Levente wrote:
hi, is there any way to make the old c7.00.02 and c7.00.00 centos repos available? currently many i686 packages missing from c7.00.03 and c7.00.04, but without these packages none of the i686 packages cab be build. regards.
we can put the c7.00.02 there ... that should have everything required to build everything in the current c7 tree .. we'll get that pushed soon
OK, Its there (c7.00.02)
may be c7.00.00 would be useful since eg gnupg2 has no i686 package which required by rpm-build-libs so required by everything...
On 06/21/2014 03:01 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
On 06/20/2014 11:18 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 06/20/2014 03:34 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 06/20/2014 12:51 PM, Farkas Levente wrote:
hi, is there any way to make the old c7.00.02 and c7.00.00 centos repos available? currently many i686 packages missing from c7.00.03 and c7.00.04, but without these packages none of the i686 packages cab be build. regards.
we can put the c7.00.02 there ... that should have everything required to build everything in the current c7 tree .. we'll get that pushed soon
OK, Its there (c7.00.02)
may be c7.00.00 would be useful since eg gnupg2 has no i686 package which required by rpm-build-libs so required by everything...
I am not building against c7.00.00 ... and everything is working fine for me now for i686. The issue is that the more older RPMs we keep putting out there, the harder it is for yum to pick the right one.
To yum, all RPMs of name-1.2.3-15.i686.rpm .. so if 3 or 4 exist, it can pick either one to use.
On 06/21/2014 12:07 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 06/21/2014 03:01 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
On 06/20/2014 11:18 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 06/20/2014 03:34 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 06/20/2014 12:51 PM, Farkas Levente wrote:
hi, is there any way to make the old c7.00.02 and c7.00.00 centos repos available? currently many i686 packages missing from c7.00.03 and c7.00.04, but without these packages none of the i686 packages cab be build. regards.
we can put the c7.00.02 there ... that should have everything required to build everything in the current c7 tree .. we'll get that pushed soon
OK, Its there (c7.00.02)
may be c7.00.00 would be useful since eg gnupg2 has no i686 package which required by rpm-build-libs so required by everything...
I am not building against c7.00.00 ... and everything is working fine for me now for i686. The issue is that the more older RPMs we keep putting out there, the harder it is for yum to pick the right one.
To yum, all RPMs of name-1.2.3-15.i686.rpm .. so if 3 or 4 exist, it can pick either one to use.
can you tell me which repo contains gnupg2-x.i686.rpm? unfortunately none of them. and this rpm required by rpm-build-libs-4.11.1-16.el7.i686 which is required for all build. so with the current c7.00.02, c7.00.03 and c7.00.04 it's not possible to build any i686 rpm:-(
On 06/21/2014 06:39 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
On 06/21/2014 12:07 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 06/21/2014 03:01 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
On 06/20/2014 11:18 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 06/20/2014 03:34 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 06/20/2014 12:51 PM, Farkas Levente wrote:
hi, is there any way to make the old c7.00.02 and c7.00.00 centos repos available? currently many i686 packages missing from c7.00.03 and c7.00.04, but without these packages none of the i686 packages cab be build. regards.
we can put the c7.00.02 there ... that should have everything required to build everything in the current c7 tree .. we'll get that pushed soon
OK, Its there (c7.00.02)
may be c7.00.00 would be useful since eg gnupg2 has no i686 package which required by rpm-build-libs so required by everything...
I am not building against c7.00.00 ... and everything is working fine for me now for i686. The issue is that the more older RPMs we keep putting out there, the harder it is for yum to pick the right one.
To yum, all RPMs of name-1.2.3-15.i686.rpm .. so if 3 or 4 exist, it can pick either one to use.
can you tell me which repo contains gnupg2-x.i686.rpm? unfortunately none of them. and this rpm required by rpm-build-libs-4.11.1-16.el7.i686 which is required for all build. so with the current c7.00.02, c7.00.03 and c7.00.04 it's not possible to build any i686 rpm:-(
I am moving one into c7.00.02 now, that should hopefully solve the issue.
On 06/21/2014 06:49 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 06/21/2014 06:39 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
On 06/21/2014 12:07 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 06/21/2014 03:01 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
On 06/20/2014 11:18 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 06/20/2014 03:34 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 06/20/2014 12:51 PM, Farkas Levente wrote: > hi, is there any way to make the old c7.00.02 and c7.00.00 > centos repos available? currently many i686 packages > missing from c7.00.03 and c7.00.04, but without these > packages none of the i686 packages cab be build. regards. > we can put the c7.00.02 there ... that should have everything required to build everything in the current c7 tree .. we'll get that pushed soon
OK, Its there (c7.00.02)
may be c7.00.00 would be useful since eg gnupg2 has no i686 package which required by rpm-build-libs so required by everything...
I am not building against c7.00.00 ... and everything is working fine for me now for i686. The issue is that the more older RPMs we keep putting out there, the harder it is for yum to pick the right one.
To yum, all RPMs of name-1.2.3-15.i686.rpm .. so if 3 or 4 exist, it can pick either one to use.
can you tell me which repo contains gnupg2-x.i686.rpm? unfortunately none of them. and this rpm required by rpm-build-libs-4.11.1-16.el7.i686 which is required for all build. so with the current c7.00.02, c7.00.03 and c7.00.04 it's not possible to build any i686 rpm:-(
I am moving one into c7.00.02 now, that should hopefully solve the issue.
OK, that is now in place, let me know if you have other issues
http://buildlogs.centos.org/c7.00.02/gnupg2/20140501124358/2.0.22-3.el7.i386...
Thanks, Johnny Hughes
On 06/21/2014 02:09 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 06/21/2014 06:49 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 06/21/2014 06:39 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
On 06/21/2014 12:07 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 06/21/2014 03:01 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
On 06/20/2014 11:18 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 06/20/2014 03:34 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 06/20/2014 12:51 PM, Farkas Levente wrote: >> hi, is there any way to make the old c7.00.02 and >> c7.00.00 centos repos available? currently many i686 >> packages missing from c7.00.03 and c7.00.04, but >> without these packages none of the i686 packages cab >> be build. regards. >> > we can put the c7.00.02 there ... that should have > everything required to build everything in the current > c7 tree .. we'll get that pushed soon OK, Its there (c7.00.02)
may be c7.00.00 would be useful since eg gnupg2 has no i686 package which required by rpm-build-libs so required by everything...
I am not building against c7.00.00 ... and everything is working fine for me now for i686. The issue is that the more older RPMs we keep putting out there, the harder it is for yum to pick the right one.
To yum, all RPMs of name-1.2.3-15.i686.rpm .. so if 3 or 4 exist, it can pick either one to use.
can you tell me which repo contains gnupg2-x.i686.rpm? unfortunately none of them. and this rpm required by rpm-build-libs-4.11.1-16.el7.i686 which is required for all build. so with the current c7.00.02, c7.00.03 and c7.00.04 it's not possible to build any i686 rpm:-(
I am moving one into c7.00.02 now, that should hopefully solve the issue.
OK, that is now in place, let me know if you have other issues
http://buildlogs.centos.org/c7.00.02/gnupg2/20140501124358/2.0.22-3.el7.i386...
seems
to working. thanks.
On 06/21/2014 02:09 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 06/21/2014 06:49 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 06/21/2014 06:39 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
On 06/21/2014 12:07 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 06/21/2014 03:01 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
On 06/20/2014 11:18 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 06/20/2014 03:34 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 06/20/2014 12:51 PM, Farkas Levente wrote: >> hi, is there any way to make the old c7.00.02 and >> c7.00.00 centos repos available? currently many i686 >> packages missing from c7.00.03 and c7.00.04, but >> without these packages none of the i686 packages cab >> be build. regards. >> > we can put the c7.00.02 there ... that should have > everything required to build everything in the current > c7 tree .. we'll get that pushed soon OK, Its there (c7.00.02)
may be c7.00.00 would be useful since eg gnupg2 has no i686 package which required by rpm-build-libs so required by everything...
I am not building against c7.00.00 ... and everything is working fine for me now for i686. The issue is that the more older RPMs we keep putting out there, the harder it is for yum to pick the right one.
To yum, all RPMs of name-1.2.3-15.i686.rpm .. so if 3 or 4 exist, it can pick either one to use.
can you tell me which repo contains gnupg2-x.i686.rpm? unfortunately none of them. and this rpm required by rpm-build-libs-4.11.1-16.el7.i686 which is required for all build. so with the current c7.00.02, c7.00.03 and c7.00.04 it's not possible to build any i686 rpm:-(
I am moving one into c7.00.02 now, that should hopefully solve the issue.
OK, that is now in place, let me know if you have other issues
http://buildlogs.centos.org/c7.00.02/gnupg2/20140501124358/2.0.22-3.el7.i386...
is
there any reason not to publish c7.00.00? eg: pacemaker can only build with publican-3.1.5 which is neither in the publish repos nor in the final release:-(
anyway will be any summary about the build problems? like the above one that pacemaker can't be build with on current os itself?
regards.
On 07/05/2014 06:10 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
On 06/21/2014 02:09 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 06/21/2014 06:49 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 06/21/2014 06:39 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
On 06/21/2014 12:07 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 06/21/2014 03:01 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
On 06/20/2014 11:18 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 06/20/2014 03:34 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 06/20/2014 12:51 PM, Farkas Levente wrote: >>> hi, is there any way to make the old c7.00.02 and >>> c7.00.00 centos repos available? currently many i686 >>> packages missing from c7.00.03 and c7.00.04, but >>> without these packages none of the i686 packages cab >>> be build. regards. >>> >> we can put the c7.00.02 there ... that should have >> everything required to build everything in the current >> c7 tree .. we'll get that pushed soon > OK, Its there (c7.00.02) may be c7.00.00 would be useful since eg gnupg2 has no i686 package which required by rpm-build-libs so required by everything...
I am not building against c7.00.00 ... and everything is working fine for me now for i686. The issue is that the more older RPMs we keep putting out there, the harder it is for yum to pick the right one.
To yum, all RPMs of name-1.2.3-15.i686.rpm .. so if 3 or 4 exist, it can pick either one to use.
can you tell me which repo contains gnupg2-x.i686.rpm? unfortunately none of them. and this rpm required by rpm-build-libs-4.11.1-16.el7.i686 which is required for all build. so with the current c7.00.02, c7.00.03 and c7.00.04 it's not possible to build any i686 rpm:-(
I am moving one into c7.00.02 now, that should hopefully solve the issue.
OK, that is now in place, let me know if you have other issues
http://buildlogs.centos.org/c7.00.02/gnupg2/20140501124358/2.0.22-3.el7.i386...
is there any reason not to publish c7.00.00? eg: pacemaker can only build with publican-3.1.5 which is neither in the publish repos nor in the final release:-(
Yes, there is a reason or it would be published. I moved the publican stuff over to c7.00.02, it should be there now, though a metadata rebuild is in progress.
Let me know if you have any more issues.
anyway will be any summary about the build problems? like the above one that pacemaker can't be build with on current os itself?
I did not keep a specific list, although all the builds and mock configs are public and there are likely upstream and centos bug entries about it. If you want to develop a list, we can certainly have it on this mailing list and put it on the wiki, either in the release notes or on a build issues page.
Thanks, Johnny Hughes
On 07/05/2014 01:46 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 07/05/2014 06:10 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
On 06/21/2014 02:09 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 06/21/2014 06:49 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 06/21/2014 06:39 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
On 06/21/2014 12:07 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 06/21/2014 03:01 AM, Farkas Levente wrote: > On 06/20/2014 11:18 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 06/20/2014 03:34 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> On 06/20/2014 12:51 PM, Farkas Levente wrote: >>>> hi, is there any way to make the old c7.00.02 >>>> and c7.00.00 centos repos available? currently >>>> many i686 packages missing from c7.00.03 and >>>> c7.00.04, but without these packages none of the >>>> i686 packages cab be build. regards. >>>> >>> we can put the c7.00.02 there ... that should have >>> everything required to build everything in the >>> current c7 tree .. we'll get that pushed soon >> OK, Its there (c7.00.02) > may be c7.00.00 would be useful since eg gnupg2 has no > i686 package which required by rpm-build-libs so > required by everything... > I am not building against c7.00.00 ... and everything is working fine for me now for i686. The issue is that the more older RPMs we keep putting out there, the harder it is for yum to pick the right one.
To yum, all RPMs of name-1.2.3-15.i686.rpm .. so if 3 or 4 exist, it can pick either one to use.
can you tell me which repo contains gnupg2-x.i686.rpm? unfortunately none of them. and this rpm required by rpm-build-libs-4.11.1-16.el7.i686 which is required for all build. so with the current c7.00.02, c7.00.03 and c7.00.04 it's not possible to build any i686 rpm:-(
I am moving one into c7.00.02 now, that should hopefully solve the issue.
OK, that is now in place, let me know if you have other issues
http://buildlogs.centos.org/c7.00.02/gnupg2/20140501124358/2.0.22-3.el7.i386...
is
there any reason not to publish c7.00.00? eg: pacemaker can only build with publican-3.1.5 which is neither in the publish repos nor in the final release:-(
Yes, there is a reason or it would be published. I moved the publican stuff over to c7.00.02, it should be there now, though a metadata rebuild is in progress.
Let me know if you have any more issues.
java6-1.6.0-* still missing.
another nice thing would be know how are you able to build python? it's clear from this builds: http://buildlogs.centos.org/c7.00.04/python/ there was many unsuccessful build, but than somehow it was successful, but how and why?
On 07/05/2014 12:23 PM, Farkas Levente wrote:
On 07/05/2014 01:46 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 07/05/2014 06:10 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
On 06/21/2014 02:09 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 06/21/2014 06:49 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 06/21/2014 06:39 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
On 06/21/2014 12:07 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 06/21/2014 03:01 AM, Farkas Levente wrote: >> On 06/20/2014 11:18 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> On 06/20/2014 03:34 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>>> On 06/20/2014 12:51 PM, Farkas Levente wrote: >>>>> hi, is there any way to make the old c7.00.02 >>>>> and c7.00.00 centos repos available? currently >>>>> many i686 packages missing from c7.00.03 and >>>>> c7.00.04, but without these packages none of the >>>>> i686 packages cab be build. regards. >>>>> >>>> we can put the c7.00.02 there ... that should have >>>> everything required to build everything in the >>>> current c7 tree .. we'll get that pushed soon >>> OK, Its there (c7.00.02) >> may be c7.00.00 would be useful since eg gnupg2 has no >> i686 package which required by rpm-build-libs so >> required by everything... >> > I am not building against c7.00.00 ... and everything is > working fine for me now for i686. The issue is that the > more older RPMs we keep putting out there, the harder it > is for yum to pick the right one. > > To yum, all RPMs of name-1.2.3-15.i686.rpm .. so if 3 or > 4 exist, it can pick either one to use. can you tell me which repo contains gnupg2-x.i686.rpm? unfortunately none of them. and this rpm required by rpm-build-libs-4.11.1-16.el7.i686 which is required for all build. so with the current c7.00.02, c7.00.03 and c7.00.04 it's not possible to build any i686 rpm:-(
I am moving one into c7.00.02 now, that should hopefully solve the issue.
OK, that is now in place, let me know if you have other issues
http://buildlogs.centos.org/c7.00.02/gnupg2/20140501124358/2.0.22-3.el7.i386...
is
there any reason not to publish c7.00.00? eg: pacemaker can only build with publican-3.1.5 which is neither in the publish repos nor in the final release:-(
Yes, there is a reason or it would be published. I moved the publican stuff over to c7.00.02, it should be there now, though a metadata rebuild is in progress.
Let me know if you have any more issues.
java6-1.6.0-* still missing.
Is it required by something I built ... looking through some older stuff I do not see a good i686 build of java-1.6.0. It might be there somewhere, but I don't see it now. We are not releasing a i686 until later and we have not begun concentration on a full i686 build yet.
However, if it is a requirement to build something that I have already built, then I'll spend more time looking.
another nice thing would be know how are you able to build python? it's clear from this builds: http://buildlogs.centos.org/c7.00.04/python/ there was many unsuccessful build, but than somehow it was successful, but how and why?
http://buildlogs.centos.org/c7.00.04/python/20140617165351/2.7.5-16.el7.i386...
There is a build.log, a root.log, a mock config and everything you could need to know right there .. shows where the things were loaded from.
On 07/05/2014 08:42 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
Let me know if you have any more issues.
java6-1.6.0-* still missing.
Is it required by something I built ... looking through some older stuff I do not see a good i686 build of java-1.6.0. It might be there somewhere, but I don't see it now. We are not releasing a i686 until later and we have not begun concentration on a full i686 build yet.
However, if it is a requirement to build something that I have already built, then I'll spend more time looking.
it's required for java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-6.1.13.1.el7.src.rpm
another nice thing would be know how are you able to build python? it's clear from this builds: http://buildlogs.centos.org/c7.00.04/python/ there was many unsuccessful build, but than somehow it was successful, but how and why?
http://buildlogs.centos.org/c7.00.04/python/20140617165351/2.7.5-16.el7.i386...
There is a build.log, a root.log, a mock config and everything you could need to know right there .. shows where the things were loaded from.
yes i see but it's still not compile. i always got the same error as this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856672
On 07/05/2014 02:20 PM, Farkas Levente wrote:
it's required for java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-6.1.13.1.el7.src.rpm
I don't think I have that built for i686 at all ... at least I do not see it built anywhere that I looked and we are not releasing an i686 version of it in the x86_64 CentOS-7 that should be out soon.
On 07/05/2014 02:25 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 07/05/2014 02:20 PM, Farkas Levente wrote:
it's required for java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-6.1.13.1.el7.src.rpm
I don't think I have that built for i686 at all ... at least I do not see it built anywhere that I looked and we are not releasing an i686 version of it in the x86_64 CentOS-7 that should be out soon.
For the record, we just built a bunch more of the i686 packages that did not build in the original run and were unneeded in the x86_64 ARCH for multilib.
They are in c7.00.04 on buildlogs.centos.org
BUT ... unfortunately java-1.6.0-openjdk was not one of the packages that built.
Thanks, Johnny Hughes
-
Farkas Levente -
Johnny Hughes