Is there an ETA on an updated kmod-xfs for the latest kernel? Looks like the package is still for the .10.el5 kernel.
Thanks!
J.
Jon Ernster wrote:
Is there an ETA on an updated kmod-xfs for the latest kernel? Looks like the package is still for the .10.el5 kernel.
were working on converting the kmod's into non kernel version specific packages, so there will be a slight delay as the kmod's get ported across.
Fair enough. Can I get a general ETA perhaps? End of the week? Early next?
Thanks,
J.
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 1:00 PM, Karanbir Singh mail-lists@karan.org wrote:
Jon Ernster wrote:
Is there an ETA on an updated kmod-xfs for the latest kernel? Looks like the package is still for the .10.el5 kernel.
were working on converting the kmod's into non kernel version specific packages, so there will be a slight delay as the kmod's get ported across.
-- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219@icq _______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
Jon Ernster wrote:
Fair enough. Can I get a general ETA perhaps? End of the week? Early next?
Thanks,
J.
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 1:00 PM, Karanbir Singh mail-lists@karan.org wrote:
Jon Ernster wrote:
Is there an ETA on an updated kmod-xfs for the latest kernel? Looks like the package is still for the .10.el5 kernel.
were working on converting the kmod's into non kernel version specific packages, so there will be a slight delay as the kmod's get ported across.
They are here and are currently being tested, but seem to work OK for me:
http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/kernel/5/plus/2.6.18-92.1.13.el5.centos.pl...
They should work fine with that kernel.
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Jon Ernster wrote:
Fair enough. Can I get a general ETA perhaps? End of the week? Early next?
Thanks,
J.
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 1:00 PM, Karanbir Singh mail-lists@karan.org wrote:
Jon Ernster wrote:
Is there an ETA on an updated kmod-xfs for the latest kernel? Looks like the package is still for the .10.el5 kernel.
were working on converting the kmod's into non kernel version specific packages, so there will be a slight delay as the kmod's get ported across.
They are here and are currently being tested, but seem to work OK for me:
http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/kernel/5/plus/2.6.18-92.1.13.el5.centos.pl...
They should work fine with that kernel.
i just look into the xfs-kmod and see this line in the config: CONFIG_XFS_DMAPI= you see the missing "y"? is it a bug or direct?
anyway this xfs source is the same as the one shipped in the rhel kernel or it's a newer xfs source?
and in the plus kernel why do you use the dist tag and not the buildid?
it'd be nice if we can somehow diff the rhel/centos and centos plus kernel's config files, currently it's very hard.
Farkas Levente wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Jon Ernster wrote:
Fair enough. Can I get a general ETA perhaps? End of the week? Early next?
Thanks,
J.
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 1:00 PM, Karanbir Singh mail-lists@karan.org wrote:
Jon Ernster wrote:
Is there an ETA on an updated kmod-xfs for the latest kernel? Looks like the package is still for the .10.el5 kernel.
were working on converting the kmod's into non kernel version specific packages, so there will be a slight delay as the kmod's get ported across.
They are here and are currently being tested, but seem to work OK for me:
http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/kernel/5/plus/2.6.18-92.1.13.el5.centos.pl...
They should work fine with that kernel.
i just look into the xfs-kmod and see this line in the config: CONFIG_XFS_DMAPI= you see the missing "y"? is it a bug or direct?
That was not on purpose ... let's see what happens when I set it to Y. It has probably been set that way for all CentOS-5 though. Fedora does not use DMAPI, so that is why it is off.
anyway this xfs source is the same as the one shipped in the rhel kernel or it's a newer xfs source?
It is somewhat newer. We have started a Project specifically for XFS, this is where XFS will be upgraded and extended in the future. Please join it if you want to make CentOS XFS better:
https://projects.centos.org/trac/xfs/
Tru ... how do they join :D
and in the plus kernel why do you use the dist tag and not the buildid?
it'd be nice if we can somehow diff the rhel/centos and centos plus kernel's config files, currently it's very hard.
It is not too hard, if you have the plus kernel installed or extracted, the config file is there as it is in the real kernel. All you need to do is run diff in whatever way you like to see the output.
If there is something you would like to have turned on, patches are accepted.
Thanks, Johnny Hughes
-
Farkas Levente -
Johnny Hughes -
Jon Ernster -
Karanbir Singh