devel September 2008

devel@lists.centos.org

43 participants
32 discussions

Re: [CentOS-devel] options on voice conf calls
by Eduardo Kaftanski 29 Sep '08

29 Sep '08

If isdn-30 is the same as E1-PRI then there are plenty of cards. Just google digium. ------Mensaje original------ De: Hugo van der Kooij Remitente: centos-devel-bounces(a)centos.org Para: The CentOS developers mailing list. Responder a: The CentOS developers mailing list. Enviado: 28 Sep 2008 17:45 Asunto: Re: [CentOS-devel] options on voice conf calls -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Karanbir Singh wrote: > Hugo van der Kooij wrote: >> Given that we have a ISDN-30 line in our lab which is over 90% of the >> time simply terminated with a loopback connector I think we might handle >> a few POTS/ISDN calls coming in. Just getting the right card would be my >> only problem now. I have found a nice 1 unit which should be able to do >> the work as long as I can find a matching ISDN card to fit into the unit. > > That sounds good, the next question is - which part of the world are you > based in :D It seems we have no fitting ISDN-30 card for a Linux box. So there is no unique contribution I can make there. I guess anyone can build a VOP box if they set their mind to it. There is another project which needs a lot more time of me. That is to build a free repo to support MailScanner. I found there are a number of conflicts between perl updates of Centos and rpmforge that seem to require that a number of packages are build by hand again but in a slightly different manner. For that I need a number of virtual machine to build and test all of this. So I am afraid I will not be able to work on the VOIP box soon. Hugo. - -- hvdkooij(a)vanderkooij.org http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/ PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc A: Yes. >Q: Are you sure? >>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFI3/sQBvzDRVjxmYERAiuSAJ446WgtXEt3W8WJIISI8qOlDSGEFACfRebB DZf5C/T9ZZmVC0Ole7pg2/U= =/Utc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel Eduardo Kaftanski e(a)nn.cl

2 1

New Trac Look and feel rolled out
by Karanbir Singh 25 Sep '08

25 Sep '08

hi, New L&F rolled out for Trac. Question to ArtWork guys: Do you guys mind if I was to Tag this set as a 'release' ? -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219@icq

3 11

rhwas php info
by Joe Pruett 24 Sep '08

24 Sep '08

i have determined that all the php-pear and php-pecl subpackages are from the extras repo, so they are not compatible with the rhwas stuff. i'm fine with that, but it would probably be nice if somehow those packages in the extra repo knew they were dependent on the base php and would get removed by yum when upgrading to the rhwas versions.

1 0

Webstack/ C5
by Karanbir Singh 24 Sep '08

24 Sep '08

The first lot of pkgs for webstack on CentOS-5 will start showing up on the testing repo shortly. Its setup to push packages every 12 hrs, so you will see some churn in the repo. File issue reports at : http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3106 All feedback is welcome, specially from people who can test the packages and confirm that they work as expected. -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219@icq

5 22

rhwas 5 issues
by Joe Pruett 24 Sep '08

24 Sep '08

please let me know if my emailing about this stuff is getting on your nerves :-). the php rebuild is missing some subpackages: php-mhash php-mssql php-readline php-tidy php-mcrypt and some of the pear and pecl pacakges seem to not be updated either, but i haven't looked at that closely yet. and the mysql in testing isn't the same as upstream. is that something that is going to be addressed?

3 4

geode anyone ?
by Karanbir Singh 23 Sep '08

23 Sep '08

Anyone with a geode based machine want to help with some testing stuff ? -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219@icq

5 15

rhwas 5 issues
by Joe Pruett 23 Sep '08

23 Sep '08

1 0

Todo list for the Artwork SIG
by Alain Reguera Delgado 23 Sep '08

23 Sep '08

Hi Guys, I am wondering where to post an Artwork SIG ToDo list. A place for people to request artwork things, something that could be used as a list of task or something like that. Distribution needs, users need, developers need, whatever ... Any suggestion ? Thanks, al.

5 40

forums down
by Ned Slider 22 Sep '08

22 Sep '08

Hi Guys, Seems like the forums were down again today (although they've just recently come back up). I believe they were also down for a good chunk of time yesterday afternoon (UTC), and last Sunday too. Reports I've had from users say they get "very sluggish" before finally becoming totally unresponsive. Can anyone fill us in on what the problem is please as this seems to have been going on a while now? Thanks :)

4 5

heartbeat.x86_64 0:2.1.3-3.el5.centos install fails
by Jon Ernster 16 Sep '08

16 Sep '08

Can someone help me diagnose this issue? I'm running CentOS 5.2 x86_64 and the heartbeat rpm seems to bomb out. I looked in /var/cache/yum/extras/packages but the rpm is there so I can't look at the preinstall script to see what's looking for/expecting? yum install heartbeat Loading "fastestmirror" plugin Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * rpmforge: fr2.rpmfind.net * base: designwaveaudio.com * updates: mirror.chpc.utah.edu * addons: mirrors.versaweb.com * extras: mirrors.easynews.com Setting up Install Process Parsing package install arguments Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package heartbeat.x86_64 0:2.1.3-3.el5.centos set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: libstonith.so.1()(64bit) for package: heartbeat --> Processing Dependency: heartbeat-stonith = 2.1.3-3.el5.centos for package: heartbeat --> Processing Dependency: heartbeat-pils = 2.1.3-3.el5.centos for package: heartbeat --> Processing Dependency: libpils.so.1()(64bit) for package: heartbeat --> Running transaction check ---> Package heartbeat-pils.x86_64 0:2.1.3-3.el5.centos set to be updated ---> Package heartbeat-stonith.x86_64 0:2.1.3-3.el5.centos set to be updated --> Finished Dependency Resolution Dependencies Resolved ============================================================================= Package Arch Version Repository Size ============================================================================= Installing: heartbeat x86_64 2.1.3-3.el5.centos extras 1.8 M Installing for dependencies: heartbeat-pils x86_64 2.1.3-3.el5.centos extras 220 k heartbeat-stonith x86_64 2.1.3-3.el5.centos extras 348 k Transaction Summary ============================================================================= Install 3 Package(s) Update 0 Package(s) Remove 0 Package(s) Total download size: 2.3 M Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading Packages: (1/3): heartbeat-stonith- 100% |=========================| 348 kB 00:00 (2/3): heartbeat-pils-2.1 100% |=========================| 220 kB 00:00 (3/3): heartbeat-2.1.3-3. 100% |=========================| 1.8 MB 00:01 Running rpm_check_debug Running Transaction Test Finished Transaction Test Transaction Test Succeeded Running Transaction Installing: heartbeat-pils ######################### [1/3] Installing: heartbeat-stonith ######################### [2/3] useradd: user hacluster exists error: %pre(heartbeat-2.1.3-3.el5.centos.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit status 9 error: install: %pre scriptlet failed (2), skipping heartbeat-2.1.3-3.el5.centos Installed: heartbeat.x86_64 0:2.1.3-3.el5.centos Dependency Installed: heartbeat-pils.x86_64 0:2.1.3-3.el5.centos heartbeat-stonith.x86_64 0:2.1.3-3.el5.centos Complete! Thanks, J.

2 3

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel September 2008