September 2014 - devel - lists.centos.org

Critical update for bash was released today.
by Jim Perrin 24 Sep '14

24 Sep '14

You should 'yum update' as soon as possible to resolve this issue. Here's why you should care: https://securityblog.redhat.com/2014/09/24/bash-specially-crafted-environme… Links to the centos updates: CentOS-5: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2014-September/020582.html CentOS-6: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2014-September/020585.html CentOS-7: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2014-September/020583.html -- Jim Perrin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77

4 3

planning and coordination with EPEL
by Jim Perrin 24 Sep '14

24 Sep '14

So, for the short term(relatively speaking), it seems that CentOS contributors wishing to push packages into EPEL would need to follow epel policy[1] for getting their packages pushed. For some this is fine, as they're already contributing. For others, this is a duplicated workload with added stress. I'd like to propose that we form a group of CentOS participants who are fedora/EPEL packagers to curate packages marked for sharing. SIGs who have common packages to be shared would then be able to request that this group of curators submit the package via existing EPEL processes. This process assumes a couple things: 1. curators have access to modify the package in both systems (to correct things in spec files for example) 2. We adopt the fedora/EPEL packaging guidelines as much as possible to minimize changes required by the curators group. 3. We have some method of assigning package ownership to SIGs and to the curators. Longer-term, I think we'll be able to work something out with EPEL that's a bit less manual, but I think this process should work for now. Comments, questions, suggested changes before I propose this to the EPEL folks as well? [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers -- Jim Perrin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77

6 7

pending updates notification on login
by Karanbir Singh 23 Sep '14

23 Sep '14

hi, I'd really like to have something where a user, on login to the vm or machine instance is told 'you have XX pending updates'. the data can come from a yum-plugin writing something somewhere ( so its not a case of running yum on each login ). Who wants to take a stab at writing something for this ? - KB -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

12 22

Re: [CentOS-devel] [atomic-devel] CentOS Atomic SIG weekly meetings: Tuesdays in #atomic at 14:30 UTC
by Karsten Wade 22 Sep '14

22 Sep '14

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 09/19/2014 01:22 AM, Haïkel wrote: > HI Karsten, > > we should try before meetings but it will probably conflict at > least when using the #topic command In Fedora, all meetings reports > are CC'ed to a list called meetingminutes, maybe we could do the > same with CentOS ? Haïkel, I think it would only conflict if both bots had chanops, they would step on each other rewriting the topic (and maybe just one would win out randomly by server response time.) But yes, let's test. :) Looks like centbot is in there ... and my test seems to have worked, they both logged: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/atomic/2014-09-22/atomic.2014-09-22-18.26.… Note that the zodbot minutes are a side effect of having the meeting in the upstream channel, there really isn't an intention to have a CentOS SIG minutes in the Fedora Project tracker. - - Karsten - -- Karsten 'quaid' Wade .^\ CentOS Doer of Stuff http://TheOpenSourceWay.org \ http://community.redhat.com @quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v' gpg: AD0E0C41 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlQga7AACgkQ2ZIOBq0ODEFuHwCg1hLXd8UF+/G55FDZUtIND1rL R1QAnRowtW98z6U1v5Aw0N4SyguOpUnT =ENQo -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

Proposal: CBS/Infrastructure Meeting 15-Sep-2014 13:00 UTC
by Brian Stinson 22 Sep '14

22 Sep '14

Hi All, There is quite a bit going on with Community Build System developers and those of us working on other tools. I thought it might be helpful to get in the same (virtual) room on a regular basis to help us coordinate our efforts. I propose that our first meeting be held at 13:00 UTC Monday September 15th, 2014 in #centos-devel on Freenode My topics for this meeting: - Is this a good recurring time for all? - What's next for Centpkg - Authentication? - Certificate Delivery? - Open Flood If there is something specific you would like included on the "agenda" let me know. Questions? Comments? Counter-proposals? Brian -- Brian Stinson bstinson(a)ksu.edu | IRC: bstinson | Bitbucket/Twitter: bstinsonmhk

8 19

CBS/Infra Meeting Tomorrow 22-Sept 13:00 UTC
by Brian Stinson 22 Sep '14

22 Sep '14

Greetings everyone! The CBS and Infrastructure teams will be meeting tomorrow, Monday, 22-September 2014 at 13:00 UTC in #centos-devel on freenode. Suggested topics: #topic Greetings #topic Old Business - FAS/IPA Testing - Centpkg Progress #topic Brainstorm SIG branch and build target names - Proposal will go out to the centos-devel ML #topic Open Floor -- Brian Stinson bstinson(a)ksu.edu | IRC: bstinson | Bitbucket/Twitter: bstinsonmhk

3 3

32-bit CentOS 7 - can I help?
by Ian Pilcher 19 Sep '14

19 Sep '14

It seems like it's been almost a month since the last update on this subject. I've got a fanless 32-bit "network server" (VIA C7 processor) that I'd love to upgrade to CentOS 7. So how can I help? Thanks! -- ======================================================================== Ian Pilcher arequipeno(a)gmail.com -------- "I grew up before Mark Zuckerberg invented friendship" -------- ========================================================================

5 13

CentOS comps duplicates and cleanup
by Tuomo Soini 19 Sep '14

19 Sep '14

CentOS comps files have duplicate entries. On fedora documentation there is example how to clean up comps file: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_use_and_edit_comps.xml_for_package_gro… comps-cleanup.xsl in comps-extras package is unfortunately not complete and removes necessary <environment> tags. There is a better version in fedora git: https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/comps.git/tree/ But that introduces minor disorder of the fields in the file. I attached here cleaned up version which produces correct alphabetic order. -- Tuomo Soini <tis(a)foobar.fi> Foobar Linux services +358 40 5240030 Foobar Oy <http://foobar.fi/>

2 1

CentOS Atomic SIG weekly meetings: Tuesdays in #atomic at 14:30 UTC
by Joe Brockmeier 18 Sep '14

18 Sep '14

Hi all, We're going to be holding a weekly SIG meeting for now to get things moving. Usually I'd send out a doodle and try to find a time that works for everybody - but for the first few meetings at least, we're going to try to make sure we can bring in some core CentOS folks and work around their schedule. Please join us in #atomic at 14:30 UTC on Tuesday 23 September and Tuesdays after that weekly until further notice. I'll try to post an agenda and try to keep it to 30 minutes every week. So, if you have issues, etc. please bring them up on the list, add to the agenda directly[1], or ping me in IRC to add to the agenda. Questions, comments, flames? Thanks, jzb [1] http://wiki.centos.org/Atomic/WeeklyMeeting -- Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud & Storage Analyst jzb(a)redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/

2 1

Centos 6.5 / httpd version
by Nathanael D. Noblet 18 Sep '14

18 Sep '14

Hello, So in trying to configure a apache server's ssl I've run into the issue that I can't enable TLSv1.1/1.2. I get an error from apache. Looking around I found the following: https://securityblog.redhat.com/2013/12/11/tlsv1-1-and-tlsv1-2-now-availabl… Which states that httpd 2.2.23 and openssl-1.0.1 will get this working, and should be in RHEL 6.5. However I can't find any httpd newer than 2.2.15 anywhere. Anyone know what's going on? -- Nathanael

2 3

on Video
by Karanbir Singh 18 Sep '14

18 Sep '14

hi folks, At the paris dojo, we had a camera running - and we even got most of the sessions recorded. However, the camera outputs MXF and SIF files, which neither youtube nor vimeo will accept ( well, and at nearlyt 30 GB an hour, my 1mbps uplink from home isnt going to quite make it worthwhile uploading either ). I dont know much about video, so could use a hand here : whats the best way to convert these into a usable format, without losing too much audio quality and getting them online ? -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

6 9

Re: [CentOS-devel] on Video
by Fernando Pimenta 18 Sep '14

18 Sep '14

Karanbir, I used OpenShot - http://www.openshot.org/ - to import, edit and publish my presentation on Youtube. I used it in a notebook with CentOS 6.5. Look at my article containing this video: http://opensource.com/life/14/9/open-source-workflow. Hope that helps. Pimenta

1 0

Storage SIG Meeting minutes
by Karanbir Singh 17 Sep '14

17 Sep '14

Hi Guys, Attending: Lalatendu Mohanty Jim Perrin Jonathan Billings Ross Smith Karanbir Singh Here are the notes from the Stora SIG Meeting from the 17th Sept: - Welcome Jonathan and Ross wanting to bring OpenAFS into the CentOS Storage SIG. OpenAFS: - kmod kabi whitelist does not always work, but that isnt a problem with the CentOS Linux buildsystem since we can do dependancy and trigger builds. the openafs kmod would just need to have a trigger on the kernel and they would then be rebuilt everytime a new kernel is done - we will need some level of testing, since kmod' build + load isnt enough of an assertion that the code will be usable - there is no real dep chain beying the gcc build tools, kernel headers and the kmod tool ( however, it wraps its own kmod tool ) - Jonathan to speak with upstream OpenAFS folks, both for their involvement in the SIG as well as licensing and redistribution permissions, if we need any - We might be able to get a few nodes running in a CI fashion to prove the builds are consumeable, and have that plumbed into the regular CentOS CI infra. - Lalatendu will attempt a srpm build for openAFS as a data point on how much work might be needed for that to be release grade GlusterFS: - NFS Ganesha support needs some deps from EPEL: longer term we want to strive for a direct relationship that works in a manner that we can consume and contribute into EPEL, for now we will just pull the deps into the StorageSIG build targets, but ensure any changes and proposed patches are upstream ( where upstream in this case is EPEL ) for those deps. - KB and Lalatendu to work on getting up a Gluster testing repo on buildlogs.centos.org and deliver a centos-release-gluster macro package to setup yum content - Lalatendu to work on a short getting started wiki page, with urls pointing to upstream docs for more info. Next meeting on the 1st Oct, at 3:15 UTC on bluejeans.com; folks wanting to attend should get in touch with KB. regards, -- Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project +44-207-0999389 | http://www.centos.org/ | twitter.com/CentOS GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

1 0

Errata in the Repo
by Steven Crothers 16 Sep '14

16 Sep '14

As the subject says, I know it's been discussed before (albeit not any great length); however, can we open discussions again about including errata in the repositories? With the more communal nature of the CentOS project and management through "Special Interest Groups" or SIGs, can we perhaps open up a packaging SIG? Nothing to big, something simply to start packaging errata into the repositories to start. Later on it can evolve, but I think that would be a great first step to tackle. Thoughts? Steven Crothers steven.crothers(a)gmail.com

3 9

Requests from Atomic SIG + Starting SIG meetings
by Joe Brockmeier 16 Sep '14

16 Sep '14

Hi all, To get the Atomic SIG rolling a bit faster we'd like to start weekly meetings and ensure the community has access to the components it needs to build images. What we need at the moment: - Space on git.centos.org for Atomic materials. - Current JSON files for the CentOS POC builds. - System for building images (can we use the system that's been used currently for the proof of concepts?) - System to build packages (Koji) that aren't in EPEL or CentOS core - Place to host the repository. - A key to sign the tree. I think part of this may be collaborating with the CBS SIG? We're looking at Thursday or Friday before Noon Eastern as a meeting time. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud & Storage Analyst jzb(a)redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/

1 0

how does the minimal and netinstall ISO install media created
by 耳东 16 Sep '14

16 Sep '14

hi guys. I want to create a cutomed centos 6.5 LiveOS (adding some sysadimn tools), which could boot from PXE. I want to consult CentOS-6.5-x86_64-minimal.iso or CentOS-6.5-x86_64-minimal.iso , but I can NOT find how does it created. I have find a ks.cfg from: https://projects.centos.org/trac/livecd/browser/trunk/CentOS6/rhel6beta-liv… but it was 4 years ago, it too old. thanks.

3 3

debug info
by Nathanael D. Noblet 15 Sep '14

15 Sep '14

Hello, So this isn't strictly a devel issue but I'm not sure what's going on. I have a CentOS 6 server that has some issues I'm trying to debug however debuginfo-install fails to work. For example running debuginfo-install httpd returns: Loaded plugins: fastestmirror enabling epel-debuginfo Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: mirror.metrocast.net * epel: mirror.us.leaseweb.net * epel-debuginfo: mirror.us.leaseweb.net * extras: mirror.ash.fastserv.com * updates: mirror.us.leaseweb.net Checking for new repos for mirrors Could not find debuginfo for main pkg: httpd-2.2.15-31.el6.centos.x86_64 Could not find debuginfo pkg for dependency package apr-1.3.9-5.el6_2.x86_64 Could not find debuginfo pkg for dependency package apr-util-1.3.9-3.el6_0.1.x86_64 Could not find debuginfo pkg for dependency package glibc-2.12-1.132.el6_5.4.x86_64 Could not find debuginfo pkg for dependency package glibc-2.12-1.132.el6_5.4.x86_64 Could not find debuginfo pkg for dependency package glibc-2.12-1.132.el6_5.4.x86_64 Could not find debuginfo pkg for dependency package glibc-2.12-1.132.el6_5.4.x86_64 Could not find debuginfo pkg for dependency package glibc-2.12-1.132.el6_5.4.x86_64 Could not find debuginfo pkg for dependency package glibc-2.12-1.132.el6_5.4.x86_64 Could not find debuginfo pkg for dependency package db4-4.7.25-18.el6_4.x86_64 Could not find debuginfo pkg for dependency package expat-2.0.1-11.el6_2.x86_64 Could not find debuginfo pkg for dependency package openldap-2.4.23-34.el6_5.1.x86_64 Could not find debuginfo pkg for dependency package openldap-2.4.23-34.el6_5.1.x86_64 Could not find debuginfo pkg for dependency package glibc-2.12-1.132.el6_5.4.x86_64 Could not find debuginfo pkg for dependency package pcre-7.8-6.el6.x86_64 Could not find debuginfo pkg for dependency package glibc-2.12-1.132.el6_5.4.x86_64 Could not find debuginfo pkg for dependency package glibc-2.12-1.132.el6_5.4.x86_64 Could not find debuginfo pkg for dependency package libselinux-2.0.94-5.3.el6_4.1.x86_64 Could not find debuginfo pkg for dependency package zlib-1.2.3-29.el6.x86_64 No debuginfo packages available to install This happens on multiple systems (2 real hardware and 1 VM). Not sure how to address it as those packages are definitely in the repo http://debuginfo.centos.org/6/x86_64/ as defined by CentOS-Debuginfo.repo . Thoughts? -- Nathanael

1 1

Re: [CentOS-devel] 32-bit CentOS 7 - can I help?
by Ian and Alison 13 Sep '14

13 Sep '14

Hi, I've also managed to compile the 32-bit kernel by adding in the missing function. (This part of the code appears to be a backport of a feature from 3.15, which could explain why it's got bits missing.) I also enabled a lot of device driver modules that were disabled in the kernel-3.10.0-i686.config, and created a config for a debug kernel. I can share my specfile and configs if someone can tell me where to send them. I've also built all the other 32-bit packages that I think should be present. Just a couple need the ExclusiveArch x86_64 line changed. Nothing has been tested yet - about to start creating a 32-bit install disc. Ian Gosling On Sat, 2014-09-13 at 12:00 +0000, centos-devel-request(a)centos.org wrote: > On 09/12/2014 12:00 AM, Ian Pilcher wrote: > > FYI, I've successfully built kernel-3.10.0-123.6.3.el7.i686.rpm (and > > friends), using kernel-3.10.0-i686.config from 3.10.0-121.el7. I had > > to unset CONFIG_PARAVIRT to work around this error: > > > > kernel/sched/cputime.c: In function 'steal_account_process_tick': > > kernel/sched/cputime.c:273:3: error: implicit declaration of function > > 'jiffies_to_nsecs' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > > this_rq()->prev_steal_time += cputime_to_nsecs(steal_ct); > > ^ > > I figured this error out. > > http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=7592 > -- CONFIDENTIAL NOTE: The information contained in this email is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete the mail. Thank you.

1 0

CentOS6 & CentOS7 on PowerKVM/ppc64
by Rishi 12 Sep '14

12 Sep '14

Dear List, I would like to express interest in running CentOS7 & probably CentOS6 production servers on ppc64 architecture. With OpenPower we have access to PowerKVM and want to understand current progress around this. Ubuntu is found to be working as ppc64el. I found blog entry http://www.karan.org/blog/2014/06/12/can-we-deliver-a-powerpc-build-for-cen… which refers to a mailchain of last month http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2014-June/010625.html followed by http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=7236 Let me know if we can help in any way to get it general available. Regards, Rushikesh

3 2

[Atomic SIG] Setting base packages for Atomic
by Joe Brockmeier 12 Sep '14

12 Sep '14

Sent this to the atomic-devel list a bit ago, but also wanted to put it in front of centos-devel for any interested parties who aren't on atomic-devel. Also was sitting in my drafts folder for a few days, so "today" was actually like Monday of this week. Sorry! -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: [atomic-devel] Setting base packages for Atomic Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 10:08:25 -0500 From: Joe Brockmeier <jzb(a)redhat.com> Reply-To: jzb(a)redhat.com Organization: Red Hat (Open Source and Standards) To: atomic-devel(a)projectatomic.io Hi all, So - question came up on Fedora's Cloud SIG mailing list today about whether to include Mesos. The reply was "we want to stick to the upstream definition... but there isn't one." We need to define this to help Fedora and CentOS (and also encourage those communities to join this discussion). Here's the repo for Fedora Atomic, currently: [master] https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/fedora-atomic.git/tree/ [f21] https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/fedora-atomic.git/tree/?h=f21 I'd like to pull together a default template for Atomic or minimal set of packages, though I think it's fine of CentOS and Fedora depart from that as needed as long as the core set of services are intact. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud & Storage Analyst jzb(a)redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/

1 0

koji build for golang
by Lokesh Mandvekar 11 Sep '14

11 Sep '14

I'm trying to build golang-1.3 in koji for CentOS7, but I see this error: Task info: https://cbs.centos.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=473 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 473 build (bananas7-el7.centos, golang-1.3.1-2.el7.centos.src.rpm): free 473 build (bananas7-el7.centos, golang-1.3.1-2.el7.centos.src.rpm): free -> open (x86_64-0.centos.org) 473 build (bananas7-el7.centos, golang-1.3.1-2.el7.centos.src.rpm): open (x86_64-0.centos.org) -> FAILED: BuildError: package golang not in list for tag bananas7-testing 0 free 0 open 0 done 1 failed Does the package have to be pre-added to this tag? -- Lokesh Freenode, OFTC: lsm5

2 2

Weird output of system load
by Mingfei Hua 11 Sep '14

11 Sep '14

All, One server of mine running CentOS 6.3. The load is very high, but few process in running or blocked. Followed is the output of /proc/stat, /proc/loadavg and top /proc/stat cpu 5351723 61716 6974590 161365578 240734 141769 380525 0 0 cpu0 4016881 9686 2510787 79408769 110721 141549 351075 0 0 cpu1 1334842 52029 4463802 81956808 130013 220 29449 0 0 intr 1081538370 139 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 106 0 0 73 0 0 531522246 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3929190 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ctxt 1074666354 btime 1409530629 processes 9684115 procs_running 1 procs_blocked 0 softirq 1418158114 0 367862840 177073 609942882 3679591 0 2 53962455 1790447 380742824 /proc/loadavg 11.21 22.50 10.74 1/2536 16895 Top -H top - 05:08:02 up 10 days, 4:50, 1 user, load average: 13.24, 23.26, 10.86 Tasks: 2535 total, 1 running, 2534 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie Cpu(s): 3.1%us, 4.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 92.5%id, 0.1%wa, 0.1%hi, 0.2%si, 0.0%st Mem: 3925040k total, 3780944k used, 144096k free, 31464k buffers Swap: 2064376k total, 1196k used, 2063180k free, 3201568k cached Sincerely, Mingfei Hua

2 1

Fwd: Re: docker-registry, inclusion of python-rsa (and perhaps others) in CentOS
by Karanbir Singh 10 Sep '14

10 Sep '14

2 1

package telepathy-idle missing?
by Sven Kieske 10 Sep '14

10 Sep '14

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Devs, thanks for your great work with CentOS 7 :) Now to my problem: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=7580 In order to use IRC (e.g. connecting to #centos and #centos-devel ;) ) I need telepathy-idle for the standard IM program called "empathy" in EL7. Is there really no upstream package for this? I couldn't find anything in git.centos.org After some miscommunication with toracat (sorry if I was a little harsh) he told me that this must be an upstream error. I would just like to verify this on this list before I go bothering upstream with a bugreport. So it would be nice to know if someone can confirm the findings of toracat. Then I can start arguing with RH what the hell they thought about not adding irc support in their standard IM client, then install pidgin (again). kind regards Sven -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) iQGcBAEBAgAGBQJUD2myAAoJEAq0kGAWDrql4G0MAIHeghF4vT97aWokDLSUxb6n XjWEBllksUHCC/vs+P3gQyOo80MDSeH7FFwfRdkt9eY62nwv+LQV0DzeNHCIEKHq orxpbJm4k3qY9lOovCjKezy84Mf1ozOGWxnlUy7Z7yX72RjJ6D/sd4fVIhXXm0j1 01ZSNK2VyflKWEYrrWy9gM6SmHuzAgzN8n4SChy3VCvFFujQ5H9i1wrGKmfVZzlX /1cbPpn0lUkh6anM0eYJXc9o/8HmXd2TFeMw8BVBxJALHKyyN9Qp9S9aFtuwi0E2 F5OZEzRrSU3aHZN2hxARB78o1uiZmfu3dMyFlY1M3kWy0yoE+OH9LCju+mq4cXQO 5f4TedYkozvZfScCW0YP0pnn680r1/OtyDy6mFVf0SOMzK4AsShwHHwW102ObYzM P18v3IQ9HfiX07jKFbgqV+gLBLSfuF4qu2d0VRwk81z/nKNlEwj4MWYzsTwOhBtY aN3iOAvXPch7W+JnvSv2TOp8e+PNSlfRkfUl4cAoSw== =u7Xu -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

4 4

Fwd: [CentOS-build-reports] Build Done: qemu-kvm 1.5.3-60.el7_0.7.i386 on c7-updates
by Pat Riehecky 09 Sep '14

09 Sep '14

Noticed this used the RHEL RC kernel rather than the GA kernel. Was that on purpose? Pat -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [CentOS-build-reports] Build Done: qemu-kvm 1.5.3-60.el7_0.7.i386 on c7-updates Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2014 13:27:54 +0000 From: <buildsys(a)centos.org> Reply-To: <centos-devel(a)centos.org> To: <centos-build-reports(a)centos.org> logs/c7-updates/qemu-kvm/20140908132502/1.5.3-60.el7_0.7.i386 logs/c7-updates/qemu-kvm/20140908132502/1.5.3-60.el7_0.7.i386/build.log logs/c7-updates/qemu-kvm/20140908132502/1.5.3-60.el7_0.7.i386/libcacard-1.5.3-60.el7_0.7.i686.rpm logs/c7-updates/qemu-kvm/20140908132502/1.5.3-60.el7_0.7.i386/libcacard-devel-1.5.3-60.el7_0.7.i686.rpm logs/c7-updates/qemu-kvm/20140908132502/1.5.3-60.el7_0.7.i386/libcacard-tools-1.5.3-60.el7_0.7.i686.rpm logs/c7-updates/qemu-kvm/20140908132502/1.5.3-60.el7_0.7.i386/mock.cfg logs/c7-updates/qemu-kvm/20140908132502/1.5.3-60.el7_0.7.i386/mock.exitcode logs/c7-updates/qemu-kvm/20140908132502/1.5.3-60.el7_0.7.i386/qemu-guest-agent-1.5.3-60.el7_0.7.i686.rpm logs/c7-updates/qemu-kvm/20140908132502/1.5.3-60.el7_0.7.i386/qemu-img-1.5.3-60.el7_0.7.i686.rpm logs/c7-updates/qemu-kvm/20140908132502/1.5.3-60.el7_0.7.i386/qemu-kvm-1.5.3-60.el7_0.7.src.rpm logs/c7-updates/qemu-kvm/20140908132502/1.5.3-60.el7_0.7.i386/qemu-kvm-debuginfo-1.5.3-60.el7_0.7.i686.rpm logs/c7-updates/qemu-kvm/20140908132502/1.5.3-60.el7_0.7.i386/root.log logs/c7-updates/qemu-kvm/20140908132502/1.5.3-60.el7_0.7.i386/state.log logs/c7-updates/qemu-kvm/20140908132502/1.5.3-60.el7_0.7.i386/stderr logs/c7-updates/qemu-kvm/20140908132502/1.5.3-60.el7_0.7.i386/stdout _______________________________________________ CentOS-build-reports mailing list CentOS-build-reports(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-build-reports

2 1

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel September 2014