devel November 2021

devel@lists.centos.org

41 participants
30 discussions

Extras in CentOS Stream 9
by Brian Stinson 08 Nov '21

08 Nov '21

Hi Folks, With CentOS Stream 9 we are publishing SIG content separately from OS content to make things easier to deliver (http://mirror.stream.centos.org/9-stream/ vs. http://mirror.stream.centos.org/SIGs/) Everything under the 9-stream directory corresponds to a repository in RHEL and repo files are included by default in centos-stream-repos at install time. Currently (in CentOS Linux) SIGs build their own repo files into centos-release-<sig> packages and ask for their release in CentOS Extras. We also ship things like epel-release and elrepo-release in Extras. I'd like to continue this in Stream 9 but make things a little bit easier for SIGs to self-manage their repo packages. Proposal: - Extras will continue but as a SIG repository, including the appropriate tags in CBS, and a separate gpg key - Extras, beginning with Stream 9, will not contain any other content besides repo packages - Extras will be the only SIG repo included in centos-stream repos (to allow folks to dnf install other repo packages) - Each SIG leader (or a designate) will be an ex-officio member of the group, allowed to tag centos-release-<sig> packages in for publishing - Other repositories (like EPEL) may also have a member designated to manage its release package If this is something SIG leaders are interested in, I will take a formal proposal to the board for sponsorship. Any comments? --Brian

6 5

Wrong checksums in .treeinfo for c9s
by Igor Raits 06 Nov '21

06 Nov '21

Hello, I've noticed that various checksums in https://composes.stream.centos.org/production/latest-CentOS-Stream/compose/… differ from the actual files (which actually causes issues with repository synchronization via pulp)… images/efiboot.img ba4708357be491ef543d64500f5cdd319bf3c02a3a804a3173053cbfdd8adc6b (real: 10752542594c7dc4893cde318f7d984d50fec213fd0b3031d1b11760b481f0ec) images/pxeboot/initrd.img 13e44ba46847be15122b1a353e293ea23b2ab153268e7eecb9004dae4faa7daa (real: 2ffa3ff06f9148bff8bea4926a0523268b8e10e5c7a708903945bac22b5f558a) Is this known issue? If not, where would one report it if not on this mailing list? Thanks in advance, Igor.

2 1

[Cloud SIG] CentOS Cloud SIG meeting minutes (2021-11-04)
by Alfredo Moralejo Alonso 04 Nov '21

04 Nov '21

====================================================== #centos-meeting: CentOS Cloud SIG meeting (2021-11-04) ====================================================== Meeting started by amoralej at 15:03:52 UTC. The full logs are available athttps://www.centos.org/minutes/2021/November/centos-meeting.2021-11-04-15… . Meeting summary --------------- * status of RDO Xena release (amoralej, 15:05:04) * LINK: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/centos-cloud-sig (spotz, 15:05:09) * RDO Xena has been released https://blogs.rdoproject.org/2021/10/rdo-xena-released/ (amoralej, 15:05:39) * status of adoption of CentOS 9 (amoralej, 15:10:42) * current activites for CS9 are mostly adding it as a testing OS for upstream OpenStack (amoralej, 15:12:00) * LINK: https://pagure.io/centos-infra/issue/513 (amoralej, 15:16:04) * cloudsig ci status (amoralej, 15:26:17) * new jenkins configuration has been documented in https://pagure.io/centos-sig-cloud/ci/blob/master/f/README.md (amoralej, 15:26:50) * ACTION: jcapitao to check if we can move to latest cico-workspace container based on CS8 (amoralej, 15:34:10) * open floor (amoralej, 15:38:29) * LINK: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/+/814007 (jcapitao, 15:38:31) * ACTION: spotz or amoralej to send mail to centos-devel wrt new chair election process (amoralej, 15:50:28) Meeting ended at 15:54:28 UTC. Action Items ------------ * jcapitao to check if we can move to latest cico-workspace container based on CS8 * spotz or amoralej to send mail to centos-devel wrt new chair election process Action Items, by person ----------------------- * amoralej * spotz or amoralej to send mail to centos-devel wrt new chair election process * jcapitao * jcapitao to check if we can move to latest cico-workspace container based on CS8 * spotz * spotz or amoralej to send mail to centos-devel wrt new chair election process * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * amoralej (98) * jcapitao (29) * spotz (12) * themayor (4) * centbot (3) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot

1 0

Thank you to Karanbir Singh
by Rich Bowen 03 Nov '21

03 Nov '21

On behalf of the CentOS Board of Directors, and the whole CentOS community, I want to thank KB for his years of service as project leader and chair of the board. KB has shaped the project for almost 2 decades, and has made the world a better place by his work over the years. KB, it's been a privilege to work with you for the past few years. Thank you for your trust and respect as I've become part of that story. I wish you much joy in your future endeavors, and will always appreciate the chance to work alongside you on this great project. Please join me in thanking KB, and in telling your KB stories. Context, in case you missed it: https://karan.org/posts/stepping-down/ -- Rich Bowen: CentOS Community Manager rbowen(a)redhat.com @rbowen // @CentOSProject 1 859 351 9166

7 7

ceph and centos:stream8
by Ken Dreyer 02 Nov '21

02 Nov '21

Hi folks, We were using "centos:8" as a base for upstream Ceph images (https://quay.io/repository/ceph/ceph) ubi8's /etc/yum.repos.d/ubi.repo does not have all the packages we need, so we're considering switching to quay.io/centos/centos:stream8 as our new base image for Ceph upstream to keep the base images current. I'm posting this to the centos list to see if there are engineering concerns about which we should be aware. - Ken

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel November 2021