devel

devel@lists.centos.org

4 participants
4640 discussions

Re: [CentOS-devel] [QA] Test-scripts for SSH and MySQL
by Athmane Madjoudj 13 Apr '11

13 Apr '11

On 04/13/2011 02:50 AM, William Chandler wrote: > Which release? Tested on CentOS 5.6 and Fedora 14/15, but should be independent. -- Athmane Madjoudj RHCE

1 0

[QA] Test-scripts for SSH and MySQL
by Athmane Madjoudj 13 Apr '11

13 Apr '11

Hello, I've attached 4 test-scripts: Two are for testing MySQL basic DB operations (I've supposed that MySQL root password is empty which is default in fresh install). The other are for SSH, one for testing SSH connectivity, the other (written in Python) create a new user and try to login with SSH. Best regards. -- Athmane Madjoudj RHCE

1 0

Metadata for csgfs outdated
by Andreas Rogge 12 Apr '11

12 Apr '11

It seems like the metadata for 4.8/csgfs is outdated. There's a GFS-kernel-2.6.9-85.2.el4_8.10.x86_64.rpm in the repo, but it is not in the xml metadata... Regards, Andreas -- Solvention Ltd. & Co. KG Egermannstr. 6-8 53359 Rheinbach Tel: +49 2226 158179-0 Fax: +49 2226 158179-9 http://www.solvention.de mailto:info@solvention.de

2 1

5.6 nspr packages appear older than 5.5 updates.
by Phil Schaffner 12 Apr '11

12 Apr '11

A forum user has encountered a problem trying to install nspr-devel. See https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?viewmode=flat&topic_id=3… The 5.6 versions look older than the 5.5 updates to yum. Attempting to install using CentOS-Vault.repo [C5.5-updates] repo also fails. Looks like tru_tru has noted the issue on #centos-qa. Phil

3 2

Re: [CentOS-devel] C5.6 missing package updates / package naming issues UPDATE
by Kerem ERSOY 12 Apr '11

12 Apr '11

I've reinstalled and db files were still missing. Then unisntalled and reinstalled and this has fixed the issue. I suspect there's some problem with the package: mod_nss-1.0.8-3.el5.x86_64.rpm Best Regards, Kerem ERSOY -----Original Message----- From: centos-devel-bounces(a)centos.org [mailto:centos-devel-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Kerem ERSOY Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2011 3:41 AM To: 'The CentOS developers mailing list.' Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] C5.6 missing package updates / package naming issues RHEL 5.5 to 5.6 disrupts the HTTPD daemon. When I run strace ahainst httpd I get this: stat("/etc/httpd/alias/cert8.db", 0x7fff1b636b80) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open("/etc/httpd/alias/cert8.db", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) stat("/etc/httpd/alias/cert7.db", 0x7fff1b636ba0) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open("/etc/httpd/alias/cert7.db", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) chdir("/etc/httpd/alias") = 0 gettimeofday({1302568595, 456914}, NULL) = 0 write(12, "[Tue Apr 12 03:36:35 2011] [erro"..., 98) = 98 gettimeofday({1302568595, 457427}, NULL) = 0 write(12, "[Tue Apr 12 03:36:35 2011] [erro"..., 86) = 86 exit_group(1) = ? I don't have cert8.db, secmod.db and key3.db files. I guess some package is missing about it too.. Best Regards, Kerem ERSOY -----Original Message----- From: centos-devel-bounces(a)centos.org [mailto:centos-devel-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Karanbir Singh Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2011 5:44 PM To: The CentOS developers mailing list. Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] C5.6 missing package updates / package naming issues On 04/10/2011 01:13 PM, Bernd Bartmann wrote: > Hi, > > first I'd like to thank you for finally provinding C5.6! > > After updating several servers to C5.6 I checked the installed RPMS > against the list of update announcements from upstream. Some updates > seem to be missing and some seem to have package naming issues: > > > Missing updates: > > - libuser > C5.6 as of today has libuser-0.54.7-2.1.el5_4.1 Upstream announced > libuser-0.54.7-2.1.el5_5.2 > (https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0170.html) > > - java-1.6.0-openjdk > C5.6 as of today has java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-1.16.b17.el5 > Upstream announced java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-1.17.b17.el5 > (https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0176.html) > Upstream announced java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-1.18.b17.el5 > (https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0214.html) > Upstream announced java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-1.20.b17.el5 > (https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0281.html) > > - tomcat5 > C5.6 as of today has tomcat5-5.5.23-0jpp.16.el5 > Upstream announced tomcat5-5.5.23-0jpp.17.el5_6 > (https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0336.html) > > - postfix > C5.6 as of today has postfix-2.3.3-2.1.el5_2 > Upstream announced postfix-2.3.3-2.2.el5_6 > (https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0422.html) > > - dhcp > C5.6 as of today has dhcp-3.0.5-23.el5_5.2 > Upstream announced dhcp-3.0.5-23.el5_6.4 > (https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0428.html) > > > For the following I'm not sure if these are really missing updates or > just different namings in the upstream and Centos RPMS: > > - openoffice.org > C5.6 as of today has openoffice.org-*-3.1.1-19.5.el5_5.1 > Upstream announced openoffice.org-base-3.1.1-19.5.el5_5.6 > (https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0182.html) > > - subversion > C5.6 as of today has subversion-1.6.11-7.el5 > Upstream announced subversion-1.6.11-7.el5_6.3 > (https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0327.html) > > - libvirt > C5.6 as of today has libvirt-0.8.2-15.el5.3 > Upstream announced libvirt-0.8.2-15.el5_6.3 > (https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0391.html) > > - glibc > C5.6 as of today has glibc-2.5-58 > Upstream announced glibc-2.5-58.el5_6.2 > (https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0412.html) > > > Can someone please clarify this? These will get cleared through the next few days. Apart from glibc, the rest are all built and in the release queue ( the src.rpms for the main distro are present seeding through - at a forced slow rate, so as to not overload the already loaded mirror network, these updates will come through right after ). Also, announcements for the updates will come through soon ( for all pkgs in the updates/ repo under /5/ ) - KB _______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel _______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel

1 0

Re: [CentOS-devel] [CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS-5.6 i386 and x86_64
by Nick Bright 10 Apr '11

10 Apr '11

On 4/8/2011 6:16 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > We are pleased to announce the immediate availability of CentOS-5.6 for > i386 and x86_64 Architectures. > > <snip> > > +++++++++++++++++++++++ > A big thanks to everyone who contributed towards this release, including > the translation teams, the qa team, the artwork team, the CentOS > Developers and all the users out there. And a special shout out to all > the donors who have contributed machines, bandwidth and infrastructure > towards the CentOS Project. They make this possible. > > Enjoy! > Thank you, CentOS team for all of your hard work on getting CentOS 5.6 out! -- ----------------------------------------------- - Nick Bright - - Network Administrator - - Valnet Telecommunications - - Tel 888-332-1616 x 315 / Fax 620-331-0789 - - Web http://www.valnet.net/ - ----------------------------------------------- - Are your files safe? - - Valnet Vault - Secure Cloud Backup - - More information& 30 day free trial at - - http://www.valnet.net/services/valnet-vault - -----------------------------------------------

1 0

Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
by carlopmart 10 Apr '11

10 Apr '11

Hi all, Please, first of all, I don't want to start a flame about this subject. I only wnat to know CentOS's developers point of view about this particular. Due to the delays that occurs in the release of new CentOS's versions and patches, and because CentOS developers involved in these tasks may not have sufficient time to devote to it (and also make if freely and spending their time), and I think that has been much talk about the whys for users and developers: - Why not a distribution fusion between Scientific Linux and CentOS? - Why not join efforts in the development of a single Enterprise Linux solid distribution based on RHEL? I repeat: I only want to know your point of view. Thanks. -- CL Martinez carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com

24 79

what / how could test reports be published
by Karanbir Singh 09 Apr '11

09 Apr '11

hi, at the moment all test are run by hand, and people look at the output on the cli. Lets change that. Fabian and I did some work during Fosdem this year to get an automation script in place. This script does : 1) setup some disk space 2) run virt-install with a specific kickstart 3) waits for machine to come back post install boot 4) gets the test scripts onto the machine 5) run each one and track progress. 6) tear down the machine instance. Now the question is : apart from test output, what else would be relevant to track? Here is my list: - install time logs - syscleanup[1] output from before tests are run and after - 'rpm -qa' output What else would be relevant here ? Second part of the issue : What format would everyone like to see these things in ? a) a simple webapp in sinatra.rb or bottle.py ? b) as long as all output is in text, we could shovel test runs into a git repo ( keep in mind that we can end up generating gigs of data per day ). c) something else ? - KB [1]: https://gitorious.org/syscleanup/syscleanup/blobs/master/syscleanup.sh ( I'll pull this into the git repo for QA Testing, so stuff is all in the same place ).

10 24

submit a RPM
by Sergio Belkin 07 Apr '11

07 Apr '11

Hi, I've read at Centos Wiki that "ts not possible to contribute a package into the CentOS Mirrors at this time. The entire process and policy around this matter is under review." I'd like to submit a RPM package to CentOS, is that impossible still? Thanks in advance! -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org

10 20

[QA/Bluecain] FTP server kickstart and test script
by Athmane Madjoudj 06 Apr '11

06 Apr '11

Hello, I've attached a kickstart and test script for testing deployment of a CentOS-5 based FTP server (vsFTPd obviously) for inclusion in Bluecain git repo Best regards. -- Athmane Madjoudj RHCE

3 5

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel