devel

devel@lists.centos.org

5 participants
4641 discussions

CentOS 4 Samba - Excel 2002/2003 bug
by Rodrigo Barbosa 26 Feb '07

26 Feb '07

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 There is a nasty bug on samba, up to 3.0.10, which causes Excel to incorrectly think a file was changes by someone else. This is a know issue, fixed on samba 3.0.11 (stock). A patch was also applied to samba on RHEL 3, but was NOT on RHEL 4. This patch (samba-3.0.9-excel.patch) will apply cleanly on samba-3.0.10-1.4E.9, and build without a glinch. This issue is NOT solves by http://support.microsoft.com/kb/324491 (has it on a machine with Office SP3 installed). Maybe we can get a centosplus version of samba with this patch applied ? []s - -- Rodrigo Barbosa "Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur" "Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill & Ted (Wyld Stallyns) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFz7+rpdyWzQ5b5ckRAnX9AKCVm1x5fxyTdrjFa8kLzHLCft7tvACffTJa kpT1XyvlDjOdMoI12djA/h0= =6b5J -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

5 6

missing mailx bugfix update in upstream mirrors
by Matthew Miller 26 Feb '07

26 Feb '07

See: <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184139> The src.rpm for this update for RHEL4 was never pushed properly, but is now where it should be. <http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2006-0687.html> And for some bizarre reason, it's marked as "Affected Products: Other", but it is indeed a RHEL4 fix (and cures an issue that bites us here). Probably you guys will notice this yourselves, but I figured I'd mention it just in case. Thanks. -- Matthew Miller mattdm(a)mattdm.org <http://mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>

2 2

Kernel used on installation media.
by Ray Van Dolson 24 Feb '07

24 Feb '07

Hi all, I hope this is not too off topic. I've searched the -devel archives, but haven't found clear-cut information on this, so thought I'd ask. I am trying to determine the kernel configuration used to build the kernel used on the installation media (CD #1 or the vmlinuz/initrd.img files in their respective images/boot.iso or images/diskboot.img files). My guess is the kernel configurations are not identical to the ones ultimately used to build the kernels used on the system once it is up and running.... I ask because I am interested in rebuilding the kernel used on CD #1 to boot into the installer. Thanks for any pointers. Ray

7 11

Re: [CentOS-devel] Installation RHEL5 - > CentOS5
by Patrick 24 Feb '07

24 Feb '07

Well, since I am new to this mailinglist, I did not know it was a discussion already held (hadn't sniffed the archieves). But thanks for the update! Regards, Patrick --- On Sat 02/24, Karanbir Singh < mail-lists(a)karan.org > wrote: From: Karanbir Singh [mailto: mail-lists(a)karan.org] To: centos-devel(a)centos.org Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 07:33:02 +0000 Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Installation RHEL5 - > CentOS5 Patrick wrote: > When I installed RHEL5 beta 2 yesterday, I came across the so-called installation number. It's used as a "serial" to unlock number-related functionality of the software. > > In other words, there is a key for the client version and one for the server version. And within those options, there are also different possibilities, like with or without visualisation. > > How does this affect CentOS5? it wont > Will this be implemented or modified? it wont. either implemented or mordified. This is again a conversation best had once the centos beta trees are public. -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219@icq _______________________________________________ No banners. No pop-ups. No kidding. Make My Way your home on the Web - http://www.myway.com

1 0

Installation RHEL5 -> CentOS5
by Patrick 24 Feb '07

24 Feb '07

When I installed RHEL5 beta 2 yesterday, I came across the so-called installation number. It's used as a "serial" to unlock number-related functionality of the software. In other words, there is a key for the client version and one for the server version. And within those options, there are also different possibilities, like with or without visualisation. How does this affect CentOS5? Will this be implemented or modified? Regards, Patrick _______________________________________________ No banners. No pop-ups. No kidding. Make My Way your home on the Web - http://www.myway.com

2 1

Available for testing CentOS5 beta
by Patrick 23 Feb '07

23 Feb '07

Hello, After reading on this mailing list that anyone interested in testing the Beta of CentOS5 should send a mail to the QA department. I got a answer back that I should make a posting here. So, here goes. After using CentOS for some time now, I would like to do something back for the community. If useful, I can test CentOS 5-beta on a test server I have for these kind of things. It it a ProLiant ML350 with a Compaq 431 RAID controler and three SCSI disks. Testing could be related to webserver, ftp, installation, etc. Since I am Dutch, checking of the language-translation could also be done. About myself, I work as a QA/QA Manager and have the responsibility for the ISO9001 Quality System. Besides that, I am also the webmaster of the companies websites. Looking forward to assist! With kind regards, Patrick RHCT _______________________________________________ No banners. No pop-ups. No kidding. Make My Way your home on the Web - http://www.myway.com

1 0

CentOS 5 Beta Initial Test Release
by Hans-Joachim Hetscher 22 Feb '07

22 Feb '07

Hi I'm Hans-Joachim from Germany managing about 6 Centos 4.4 installations and I'd like to help you. I'll do some tests on clustering and XEN.

1 0

QA for version 5
by Chris Hemsing 22 Feb '07

22 Feb '07

Hello, I'd like to paticipate in the QA. Been a linux sysadmin for more than 20 years. Run several public servers based on CentOS. Participate in BlueQuartz port to CentOS 5. Chris Hemsing

1 0

QA for version 5
by Patrick S. Harper 21 Feb '07

21 Feb '07

I would like the opportunity to be part of the QA for version 5, I maintain the CentOS install docs for Snort on snort.org and would like to test it out with that and other tools I use and provide any feedback I might be able to give.

1 0

Timeline for C5 beta / final?
by Joshua Kramer 20 Feb '07

20 Feb '07

All, Does anyone have a timeline for the CentOS 5 release candidates and/or final? Thanks, -Josh

11 32

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel