devel

devel@lists.centos.org

10 participants
4617 discussions

[CentOS PaaS SIG]: Origin v3.10 rpms available for testing
by Daniel Comnea 07 Aug '18

07 Aug '18

Hi, We would like to announce that Origin v3.10 rpms are available for testing at [1]. As such we are calling for help from community to start testing and let us know if there are issues with the rpms and its dependencies. And in the spirit of transparency see below the plan to promote the rpms to mirror.centos.org repo: 1. in the next 24/72 hours the packages should be promoted to the test repo [2] (currently it does not exist, we are waiting to be sync'ed in the background) 2. in a week time if we haven't heard any issues/ blockers we are going to promote to [3] repo (currently it doesn't exist, it will once the rpm will be promoted and signed) Thank you, PaaS SiG team [1] https://cbs.centos.org/repos/paas7-openshift-origin310-testing/x86_64/os/Pa… [2] https://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/paas/x86_64/openshift-origin310/ [3] http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/paas/x86_64/openshift-origin310/

1 1

Documentation help requested (Re: Upgrading from 6 to 7)
by Rich Bowen 06 Aug '18

06 Aug '18

Hi, folks, I was hoping that someone with more knowledge than I about the 6 -> 7 upgrade process would have a look at https://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/CentOSUpgradeTool The page starts with a vague warning, and then continues to give detailed instructions, leaving it very unclear which parts the warning refers to. If the process is broken, let's remove all of this and point to the correct process. If only a part of the process is broken, we need to remove that from the doc, and drop the scary warning. As it is, the page *appears* to be a "don't do it this way" kind of page, and, as you know, 90% of people will simply skip past the warning and cut-paste the instructions. Thanks for any advice and/or edits that can happen here. --Rich -- Rich Bowen - rbowen(a)redhat.com @CentOSProject // @rbowen 859 351 9166

4 4

Re: [CentOS-devel] Storage SIG: Samba vfs CEPH
by Harry Mallon 06 Aug '18

06 Aug '18

Hi Ken, Is there anything I can do to help this along? Should I make a feature request in Bugzilla or anything? Thanks, Harry > The Ceph upstream developers do not test Samba's integration as well > as they develop and test the nfs-ganesha plugin. So it's unknown to me > how well the plugin works today. > > However, you're right Fedora has built it for a while, so I don't see > an issue with providing it in the Storage SIG. This would let CentOS > users can test it more easily. > > - Ken > > > Harry Mallon Senior Software Engineer T+44 203 7000 989 60 Poland Street | London | England | W1F 7NT On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 11:51 AM, Harry Mallon > > <Harry.Mallon(a)codex.online> wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > The samba package in base for CentOS 7 doesn't have the CEPH VFS module (only on fedora I believe). Is that indicative of a known bug, or could the samba-vfs-ceph package be provided in the Storage SIG repos? > > > > Thanks, > > Harry

1 0

Using meetbot commands in your SIG meetings
by Rich Bowen 02 Aug '18

02 Aug '18

A reminder, as we head into August: If you will use the meetbot commands in your IRC SIG meetings (especially #info, #agreed, and #help - full command documentation is here - https://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot ) this will greatly simplify going back and extracting monthly summaries from your meeting minutes (published here - https://www.centos.org/minutes/2018/July/ ) and turning them into blog posts, tweets, and the monthly newsletter. Remember that your SIG meeting is not *just* for you, but is also one of the ways that you "report" back to the larger community what you've been working on. Related, if there's any way in which I can help you promote what you're doing on your SIGs, please don't hesitate to let me know. -- Rich Bowen - rbowen(a)redhat.com @CentOSProject // @rbowen 859 351 9166

2 5

[altarch][ppc64le] Packages needed for Triple O Container Builds
by Michael Turek 01 Aug '18

01 Aug '18

Hello all, We've been trying to enable tripleo container builds in the centos rdo community and quickly ran into some problematic RPMs. Specifically, centos-release-ceph-luminous and centos-release-opstools. They were problematic for altarch but have recently been patched to work with the $contentdir var. I set up a test to see how they install, linked below [0][1], and found that centos-release-storage-common would also be needed. Adding that seemed to allow everything to install properly. The test also installs ceph, as the centos-release-ceph-luminous package just enables a repo. If you would like any more testing to be done here please let me know, I'd be happy to help move this along. To reiterate, the packages we'd like to see published by altarch are: centos-release-ceph-luminous http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=23175 centos-release-storage-common http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=7274 centos-release-opstools http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=23201 Thanks! Mike Turek <mjturek> [0] https://ci.centos.org/job/rdo-test-day-tools-ppc64le/15/consoleFull [1] https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/15069/

2 1

[CentOS PaaS SIG]: new rpms available
by Daniel Comnea 31 Jul '18

31 Jul '18

Hi, We would like to announce that new openshift-ansible rpms been made *available:* 1. *openshift v3.6* => openshift-ansible-3.6.173.0.128-1.git.1.a18588a.el7 which can be found at [1] 2. *openshift v3.7* => openshift-ansible-3.7.61-1.git.1.3624530.el7 which can be found at [2] 3. *openshift v3.9* => openshift-ansible-3.9.40-1.git.1.b3380d7.el7 which can be found at [3] For openshift v3.10 we are working on getting the origin v3.10.0-rc.0 out for testing very soon once we manage to fix an issue in our code automation. Thank you, PaaS SiG team [1] http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/paas/x86_64/openshift-origin36/ [2] http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/paas/x86_64/openshift-origin37/ [3] http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/paas/x86_64/openshift-origin39/

1 0

SIG reports due by Wednesday, Aug 1st
by Rich Bowen 30 Jul '18

30 Jul '18

If you'd like to have a report from your SIG in the August newsletter, please get me a sentence/paragraph/whatever by Wednesday. You can see example reports from other SIGs in the previous newsletters: https://wiki.centos.org/Newsletter/1801 https://wiki.centos.org/Newsletter/1802 Thanks! -- Rich Bowen - rbowen(a)redhat.com @CentOSProject // @rbowen 859 351 9166

1 0

Where is the source code for specific build in koji ?
by Felipe de Jesus Ruiz Garcia 27 Jul '18

27 Jul '18

Hi there Im looking for the git repository for the build http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=22500 I saw at https://git.centos.org/summary/rpms!kubernetes.git but this repo is not matching with the build that im looking for. The build was made for Centos... Regards Felipe Ruiz

1 0

centos-git-common: Add requirements.txt
by Felipe de Jesus Ruiz Garcia 27 Jul '18

27 Jul '18

Adding requirements.txt file that provides the non-default python dependencies requires for the centos.git.repolist.py . This ease the the creation of the virtualenv.

1 0

Call for Presentations: CentOS Dojo at FOSDEM
by Rich Bowen 26 Jul '18

26 Jul '18

February feels like a long way away right now, but as some folks have been asking about our annual FOSDEM Dojo, we've opened the Call for Presentations to start collecting your talk ideas. CFP: https://goo.gl/forms/XkXbC2AZBgKvfDNF2 Event details: https://wiki.centos.org/Events/Dojo/Brussels2019 -- Rich Bowen - rbowen(a)redhat.com @CentOSProject // @rbowen 859 351 9166

1 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel