devel

devel@lists.centos.org

10 participants
4617 discussions

CentOS PaaS SIG meeting (2017-09-20)
by Troy Dawson 20 Sep '17

20 Sep '17

Hello, It's time for our weekly PaaS SIG sync-up meeting Time: 1700 UTC - Wedensdays (date -d "1700 UTC") Date: Today Wedensday, 20 September 2017 Where: IRC- Freenode - #centos-devel Agenda: - OpenShift Current Status -- rpms -- Automated rpm building and Automated testing -- Multi-arch -- Documentation -- Images and Image building -- minishift -- kompose - Open Floor Minutes from last meeting: https://www.centos.org/minutes/2017/september/centos-devel.2017-09-06-17.00…

1 0

SIG content for altarch not landing yet on mirrors.centos.org
by Sandro Bonazzola 19 Sep '17

19 Sep '17

Hi, I hoped that CentOS 7.4 release would have helped closing gaps between x86_64 and other arches, but sadly it didn't happen. What do we need to do for getting the following bugs moving on? https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=13633 - opstools SIG aarch64 and ppc64le released packages are not published https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=13283 - Virt and OpsTools SIG altarch packages are not published on mirror.centos.org https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=11457 - Please establish publishing pipeline for ovirt 4.0 altarch hierarchy (well, now should be 4.1 not 4.0) I guess other SIGs are in the same state since I don't see storage or cloud repos as well on http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/ Thanks, -- SANDRO BONAZZOLA ASSOCIATE MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA ENG VIRTUALIZATION R&D Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/> <https://red.ht/sig> TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. <https://redhat.com/trusted>

2 2

7.4.1708 sources are missing on vault.centos.org
by Jacco Ligthart 15 Sep '17

15 Sep '17

Hi, You're probably aware, but the sources of 7.4.1708 are still missing. Somewhere last night all directories were created, but most of them (all but 'rt') are still empty. Jacco

2 1

where is the centos-packager source?
by Ken Dreyer 15 Sep '17

15 Sep '17

Is there a Git repository with the source code for the centos-packager package? I'm interested in adding a feature to centos-cert to allow downloading the CAs without re-generating a user cert (basically splitting up download_cert() in /usr/bin/centos-cert.) This would make it easier to run cbs in Jenkins with ephemeral cloud slaves, without having to hardcode the https://accounts.centos.org/ca/ca-cert.pem URL in the job's code. It also looks like the centos-packager.spec's License field says "GPLv2+", whereas the COPYING file is the GPLv3, so it would be good to make these align. - Ken

3 3

Publishing pre-baked OpenShift Origin images
by Scott Dodson 13 Sep '17

13 Sep '17

In openshift-ansible we've been working on tooling to create golden images and shift the model from running ansible on each provisioned host to creating hosts that bootstrap themselves when provided an API endpoint and a token. We'd like to explore publishing a Centos based Origin AMI so that people could use an existing image without even having to bake their own. Should we coordinate this through either SIG Cloud or SIG PaaS or should we just go ahead and do it on our own for now and work to integrate with those SIGs in the future? -- Scott

3 6

[Minutes] RDO meeting - 2017-09-13
by Chandan kumar 13 Sep '17

13 Sep '17

============================== #rdo: RDO meeting - 2017-09-13 ============================== Meeting started by chandankumar at 15:02:00 UTC. The full logs are available at http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/rdo_meeting___2017_09_13/2017/rdo_m… . Meeting summary --------------- * Roll Call (chandankumar, 15:02:12) * dropping patches repositories (chandankumar, 15:05:17) * AGREED: create patches branches on-demand (number80, 15:17:05) * AGREED: abandon patches open reviews for EOL branches (number80, 15:17:15) * ACTION: number80 document that where it fits ^ (number80, 15:17:27) * Fedora worker cleanup in RDO Trunk (chandankumar, 15:18:31) * ACTION: jpena to check inclusion of openstack-macros in RDO Trunk (jpena, 15:27:18) * Using the CentOS extras Ansible (chandankumar, 15:35:10) * rdopkg is now in Fedora 25+ and EPEL 7 (chandankumar, 15:44:26) * ACTION: jruzicka to update website (jruzicka, 15:47:17) * chair for next meeting (chandankumar, 15:51:40) * ACTION: jruzicka to chair for next meeting (chandankumar, 15:53:25) * Open discussion (chandankumar, 15:53:50) Meeting ended at 16:01:34 UTC. Action items, by person ----------------------- * jpena * jpena to check inclusion of openstack-macros in RDO Trunk * jruzicka * jruzicka to update website * jruzicka to chair for next meeting * number80 * number80 document that where it fits ^ * openstack * jpena to check inclusion of openstack-macros in RDO Trunk People present (lines said) --------------------------- * chandankumar (48) * number80 (47) * apevec (43) * jruzicka (31) * snecklifter (25) * jpena (18) * dmsimard (8) * openstack (8) * rbowen (7) * Duck (6) * PagliaccisCloud (2) * rdogerrit (2) * jatanmalde (2) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4

2 1

Disk size on Vagrant image
by Jeff Sheltren 12 Sep '17

12 Sep '17

I have some development projects that require a large amount of disk on the VM, and are running into issues with the current centos/7 Vagrant box. Is it possible to increase the disk size of the Vagrant image to 100, or even 200 GB? Since this is a sparse image, I don't believe the change will have any affect on people using less disk space, it will only use up as much space on the host system as is in use on the VM. Laurențiu, what do you think? Thanks, Jeff

8 18

LinchPin v1.0.3 (bugfix) has been released
by Clint Savage 12 Sep '17

12 Sep '17

Hi all, We are happy to announce that LinchPin v1.0.3 has been released. This is a bugfix release, which has the following updates: * remove gce2 module and use the standard module from ansible * requirements.txt to use Ansible >= 2.3.1 (this means we can package it for Fedora) * remove other requirements from requirements.txt that are not necessary * improved documentation around clouds.yaml and --creds-path * CLI exits with proper exit codes (with tests to verify) * linchpin fetch (download local/remote workspaces) * flake8 testing * ovirt support with docs! * linchpin.conf supports overriding specific sections from previous config * os_server module updated to handle multiple provisioning properly * remove cruft from api framework * upgrade setuptools and pip in tests * move lp_init into api and cli to work together * workspace set and get methods * other miscellany The official release notes are available at https://github.com/CentOS-PaaS-SIG/linchpin/releases/tag/v1.0.3 This update is available via PyPi - https://pypi.python.org/pypi/linchpin If you discover any errors or regressions, please open a Github issue ( https://github.com/CentOS-PaaS-SIG/linchpin/issues) Cheers and enjoy! Clint Savage LinchPin Maintainer Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat twitter: @herlo, github: herlo, IRC: herlo, #linchpin

1 0

CentOS 7.4.1708 as basic el7 buildroot in CBS
by Fabian Arrotin 11 Sep '17

11 Sep '17

Hi, As discussed on the list, we wanted to push 7.4.1708 first to CBS/Koji and at the same time to CI (so that what's built against a specific tree can be tested against the same set of pkgs in CI) We'll so make it 7.4.7108 available within CBS in the next hours, and for *all* arches actually covered within CBS. That means that we'll switch (before it's pushed to external mirrors and so be announced) the buildroots to start using the following repositories: 7.4.1708/{os,updates,extras} That will be so done in parallel for x86_64,aarch64,ppc64,ppc64le . We're just launching some sanity tests against those trees (all in place) and then we'll open this in CBS/Koji (plenty of tasks for this as Koji will have to rebuild internal metadata for those mirrors, aka "koji regen-repo $buildroot") We'll post an update here when it will be switched and so active. That will let some time for SIGs to build some of the pkgs that were waiting/depending on 7.4.1708 pkgs from the distro, and so be "ready" before we go GA with 7.4.1708 (in the next days) Hope this will help -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab

2 4

No Paas SIG meeting this week
by Troy Dawson 11 Sep '17

11 Sep '17

I forgot that I was going to be at a conference this week and not be able to make the Paas SIG meeting. If someone else wants to run the meeting this week, they can. I currently don't know of anything new this week, but if you have an announcement that can't wait an extra week, feel free to sent it to centos-devel. Sorry about cancelling this week. Troy

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel