devel

devel@lists.centos.org

2 participants
4591 discussions

[URGENT] qemu-kvm-ev 2.9.0 not yet on mirrors.centos.org
by Sandro Bonazzola 21 Sep '17

21 Sep '17

Hi, can we please have qemu-kvm-ev pushed to mirrors ASAP? We tagged it for release while 7.4 was being pushed to mirrors to be picked up at first sync but looks like it's still hanging somewhere. It's becoming a serious with people starting upgrading to CentOS 7.4. Thanks, -- SANDRO BONAZZOLA ASSOCIATE MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA ENG VIRTUALIZATION R&D Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/> <https://red.ht/sig> TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. <https://redhat.com/trusted>

4 7

latest thunderbird is missing n git
by Jacco Ligthart 20 Sep '17

20 Sep '17

Hi, I found another item missing. The latest centos branded version for thunderbird is missing in git. Thanks, Jacco

1 0

New CentOS Atomic Host with OverlayFS Storage
by Jason Brooks 20 Sep '17

20 Sep '17

The CentOS Atomic SIG has released an updated version (https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Atomic/Download) of CentOS Atomic Host (7.1708), a lean operating system designed to run Docker containers, built from standard CentOS 7 RPMs, and tracking the component versions included in Red Hat Enterprise Linux Atomic Host. This release, which is based on the RHEL 7.4 source code (https://seven.centos.org/2017/08/centos-linux-7-1708-based-on-rhel-7-4-sour…), includes an updated kernel that supports overlayfs container storage, among other enhancements. CentOS Atomic Host includes these core component versions: * atomic-1.18.1-3.1.git0705b1b.el7.x86_64 * cloud-init-0.7.9-9.el7.centos.2.x86_64 * docker-1.12.6-48.git0fdc778.el7.centos.x86_64 * etcd-3.1.9-2.el7.x86_64 * flannel-0.7.1-2.el7.x86_64 * kernel-3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64 * kubernetes-node-1.5.2-0.7.git269f928.el7.x86_64 * ostree-2017.7-1.el7.x86_64 * rpm-ostree-client-2017.6-6.atomic.el7.x86_64 ## OverlayFS Storage In previous releases of CentOS Atomic Host, SELinux had to be in permissive or disabled mode for OverlayFS storage to work. Now you can run the OverlayFS file system with SELinux in enforcing mode. CentOS Atomic Host still defaults to devicemapper storage, but you can switch to OverlayFS using the following commands: $ systemctl stop docker $ atomic storage reset # Reallocate space to the root VG - tweak how much to your liking $ lvm lvextend -r -l +50%FREE atomicos/root $ atomic storage modify --driver overlay2 $ systemctl start docker For more information on storage management options, see the upstream RHEL documentation (https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux_atom…). ## Containerized Master CentOS Atomic Host ships without the kubernetes-master package built into the image. For information on how to run these kubernetes components as system containers, consult the CentOS wiki (https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Atomic/Download). If you prefer to run Kubernetes from installed rpms, you can layer the master components onto your Atomic Host image using rpm-ostree package layering with the command: atomic host install kubernetes-master -r. ## Download CentOS Atomic Host CentOS Atomic Host is available as a VirtualBox or libvirt-formatted Vagrant box, or as an installable ISO, qcow2 or Amazon Machine image. For links to media, see the CentOS wiki (https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Atomic/Download). ## Upgrading If you're running a previous version of CentOS Atomic Host, you can upgrade to the current image by running the following command: $ sudo atomic host upgrade ## Release Cycle The CentOS Atomic Host image follows the upstream Red Hat Enterprise Linux Atomic Host cadence. After sources are released, they're rebuilt and included in new images. After the images are tested by the SIG and deemed ready, we announce them. ## Getting Involved CentOS Atomic Host is produced by the CentOS Atomic SIG (http://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Atomic), based on upstream work from Project Atomic (http://www.projectatomic.io/). If you'd like to work on testing images, help with packaging, documentation -- join us! The SIG meets every two weeks on Tuesday at 04:00 UTC in #centos-devel, and on the alternating weeks, meets as part of the Project Atomic community meeting at 16:00 UTC on Monday in the #atomic channel. You'll often find us in #atomic and/or #centos-devel if you have questions. You can also join the atomic-devel (https://lists.projectatomic.io/mailman/listinfo/atomic-devel) mailing list if you'd like to discuss the direction of Project Atomic, its components, or have other questions. ## Getting Help If you run into any problems with the images or components, feel free to ask on the centos-devel (http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel) mailing list. Have questions about using Atomic? See the atomic (https://lists.projectatomic.io/mailman/listinfo/atomic) mailing list or find us in the #atomic channel on Freenode.

1 0

CentOS PaaS SIG meeting (2017-09-20)
by Troy Dawson 20 Sep '17

20 Sep '17

Hello, It's time for our weekly PaaS SIG sync-up meeting Time: 1700 UTC - Wedensdays (date -d "1700 UTC") Date: Today Wedensday, 20 September 2017 Where: IRC- Freenode - #centos-devel Agenda: - OpenShift Current Status -- rpms -- Automated rpm building and Automated testing -- Multi-arch -- Documentation -- Images and Image building -- minishift -- kompose - Open Floor Minutes from last meeting: https://www.centos.org/minutes/2017/september/centos-devel.2017-09-06-17.00…

1 0

SIG content for altarch not landing yet on mirrors.centos.org
by Sandro Bonazzola 19 Sep '17

19 Sep '17

Hi, I hoped that CentOS 7.4 release would have helped closing gaps between x86_64 and other arches, but sadly it didn't happen. What do we need to do for getting the following bugs moving on? https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=13633 - opstools SIG aarch64 and ppc64le released packages are not published https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=13283 - Virt and OpsTools SIG altarch packages are not published on mirror.centos.org https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=11457 - Please establish publishing pipeline for ovirt 4.0 altarch hierarchy (well, now should be 4.1 not 4.0) I guess other SIGs are in the same state since I don't see storage or cloud repos as well on http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/ Thanks, -- SANDRO BONAZZOLA ASSOCIATE MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA ENG VIRTUALIZATION R&D Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/> <https://red.ht/sig> TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. <https://redhat.com/trusted>

2 2

7.4.1708 sources are missing on vault.centos.org
by Jacco Ligthart 15 Sep '17

15 Sep '17

Hi, You're probably aware, but the sources of 7.4.1708 are still missing. Somewhere last night all directories were created, but most of them (all but 'rt') are still empty. Jacco

2 1

where is the centos-packager source?
by Ken Dreyer 15 Sep '17

15 Sep '17

Is there a Git repository with the source code for the centos-packager package? I'm interested in adding a feature to centos-cert to allow downloading the CAs without re-generating a user cert (basically splitting up download_cert() in /usr/bin/centos-cert.) This would make it easier to run cbs in Jenkins with ephemeral cloud slaves, without having to hardcode the https://accounts.centos.org/ca/ca-cert.pem URL in the job's code. It also looks like the centos-packager.spec's License field says "GPLv2+", whereas the COPYING file is the GPLv3, so it would be good to make these align. - Ken

3 3

Publishing pre-baked OpenShift Origin images
by Scott Dodson 13 Sep '17

13 Sep '17

In openshift-ansible we've been working on tooling to create golden images and shift the model from running ansible on each provisioned host to creating hosts that bootstrap themselves when provided an API endpoint and a token. We'd like to explore publishing a Centos based Origin AMI so that people could use an existing image without even having to bake their own. Should we coordinate this through either SIG Cloud or SIG PaaS or should we just go ahead and do it on our own for now and work to integrate with those SIGs in the future? -- Scott

3 6

[Minutes] RDO meeting - 2017-09-13
by Chandan kumar 13 Sep '17

13 Sep '17

============================== #rdo: RDO meeting - 2017-09-13 ============================== Meeting started by chandankumar at 15:02:00 UTC. The full logs are available at http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/rdo_meeting___2017_09_13/2017/rdo_m… . Meeting summary --------------- * Roll Call (chandankumar, 15:02:12) * dropping patches repositories (chandankumar, 15:05:17) * AGREED: create patches branches on-demand (number80, 15:17:05) * AGREED: abandon patches open reviews for EOL branches (number80, 15:17:15) * ACTION: number80 document that where it fits ^ (number80, 15:17:27) * Fedora worker cleanup in RDO Trunk (chandankumar, 15:18:31) * ACTION: jpena to check inclusion of openstack-macros in RDO Trunk (jpena, 15:27:18) * Using the CentOS extras Ansible (chandankumar, 15:35:10) * rdopkg is now in Fedora 25+ and EPEL 7 (chandankumar, 15:44:26) * ACTION: jruzicka to update website (jruzicka, 15:47:17) * chair for next meeting (chandankumar, 15:51:40) * ACTION: jruzicka to chair for next meeting (chandankumar, 15:53:25) * Open discussion (chandankumar, 15:53:50) Meeting ended at 16:01:34 UTC. Action items, by person ----------------------- * jpena * jpena to check inclusion of openstack-macros in RDO Trunk * jruzicka * jruzicka to update website * jruzicka to chair for next meeting * number80 * number80 document that where it fits ^ * openstack * jpena to check inclusion of openstack-macros in RDO Trunk People present (lines said) --------------------------- * chandankumar (48) * number80 (47) * apevec (43) * jruzicka (31) * snecklifter (25) * jpena (18) * dmsimard (8) * openstack (8) * rbowen (7) * Duck (6) * PagliaccisCloud (2) * rdogerrit (2) * jatanmalde (2) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4

2 1

Disk size on Vagrant image
by Jeff Sheltren 12 Sep '17

12 Sep '17

I have some development projects that require a large amount of disk on the VM, and are running into issues with the current centos/7 Vagrant box. Is it possible to increase the disk size of the Vagrant image to 100, or even 200 GB? Since this is a sparse image, I don't believe the change will have any affect on people using less disk space, it will only use up as much space on the host system as is in use on the VM. Laurențiu, what do you think? Thanks, Jeff

8 18

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel