devel

devel@lists.centos.org

10 participants
4617 discussions

nfs bug - any info on bugzilla 1324635
by Jagga Soorma 02 Jun '16

02 Jun '16

Hi Guys, Anyone have any information on bugzilla 1324635. This seems like a private bug being tracked by redhat but is major and impacting us. Basically nfs gets impacted with large writes. Thanks!

1 0

[RFC] Operational tools SIG (was logging and monitoring...)
by Matthias Runge 01 Jun '16

01 Jun '16

Hello, I would like to re-iterate my interest in having a SIG in CentOS to provide all kinds of tools for operators providing infrastructure by using CentOS. The scope should be more than just simply packaging applications. Another part should be to provide puppet manifests or ansible playbooks to get things quicker up and running. Ideally, I would start with providing something like * elsasticsearch/fluentd/kibana for centralised logging * collectd/graphite/grafana for performance monitoring * sensu/uchiwa for availability monitoring We have already seen around 10 persons interested in helping, testing, trying out and providing feedback. For communcations etc. I would propose to start small, and to share already existent CentOS channels (email-lists, irc-channel). This decision should be revisited, once amount of SIG related communication becomes annoying in general channels. Questions? Thoughts? Additions? Best, Matthias -- Matthias Runge <mrunge(a)matthias-runge.de>

4 6

Fail to load kernel module ipmi_si on CentOS-6
by Frank Yu 28 May '16

28 May '16

Hi all, I am trying to load kernel module ipmi_si, while failed with error "No such device", truth is I can find file in ../kernel/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si.ko. So why I can't load it? Steps: # ls -l /lib/modules/2.6.32-573.el6.x86_64/kernel/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si.ko -rwxr--r--. 1 root root 93080 Jul 23 2015 /lib/modules/2.6.32-573.el6.x86_64/kernel/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si.ko # modprobe ipmi_si FATAL: Error inserting ipmi_si (/lib/modules/2.6.32-573.el6.x86_64/kernel/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si.ko): No such device # lsmod |grep ipmi ipmi_devintf 7729 0 ipmi_poweroff 8532 0 ipmi_watchdog 17874 0 ipmi_msghandler 38701 3 ipmi_devintf,ipmi_poweroff,ipmi_watchdog # ipmitool Could not open device at /dev/ipmi0 or /dev/ipmi/0 or /dev/ipmidev/0: No such file or directory What should I do if I want to setup IPMI on my centos host? -- Regards Frank Yu

2 2

Link to Red Hat customer portal in yum error message
by Jitse Klomp 26 May '16

26 May '16

Hello, I updated my CentOS 6 machine yesterday and it threw this error at me (before I switched to centos-release-scl): http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/SCL/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno 14] PYCURL ERROR 22 - "The requested URL returned error: 404 Not Found" Trying other mirror. To address this issue please refer to the below knowledge base article https://access.redhat.com/articles/1320623 If above article doesn't help to resolve this issue please open a ticket with Red Hat Support. Did you miss this when removing Red Hat branding or is it supposed to say this? - Jitse

2 4

6.8 and AWS AMIs
by BC 25 May '16

25 May '16

Is there a planned timeline for 6.8 AMIs? Will an official AMI kickstart be provided in a repo somewhere (or perhaps there already is and I can't find it)? Thanks for all the hard work, guys!

2 1

CentOS PaaS SIG meeting (2016-05-25)
by Troy Dawson 25 May '16

25 May '16

Hello, It's time for our weekly PaaS SIG sync-up meeting Time: 1700 UTC - Wedensdays Date: Today Wedensday, 25 May 2016 Where: IRC- Freenode - #centos-devel Agenda: - OpenShift Current Status -- origin 1.2.0 -- centos-openshift-future --- golang 1.6.2 -- Automated testing -- images / image building -- Documentation - Next 2 SIG Meetings -- tdawson will be gone for next two meetings -- Will someone want to chair the meetings? -- Do we want to skip the meetings for two weeks? - Open Floor Last Weeks minutes: https://www.centos.org/minutes/2016/may/centos-devel.2016-05-18-17.01.log.h…

1 0

The SCL wiki page contents and confusing SCL situation
by James Hogarth 24 May '16

24 May '16

Hi, I thought I'd start an article on my personal blog on the various options for newer PHP (in particular), python, ruby etc options in CentOS - particularly given some of the base packages in EL6 have now passed EOL upstream and consequently some applications (eg OwnCloud) now have minimal dependencies greater than in base. What I found on initial looks to SCL was at best confusing and in areas outright misleading, with help needed from Dominic in #centos-devel to work through the present SCL situation. Doing a general Google search (or the @scl keyword in #centos) will take someone to here: https://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/SCL This refers to an old centos-release-SCL package which is still in the repos and would direct the user to unmaintained old versions. The correct package is actually centos-release-scl ... yes just the case needs to change. The documentation for centos-release-scl stuff (ie the CentOS SCL SIG stuff) is pretty much nonexistent for a user needing a newer version of a package. These pages are very CentOS developer focused and not really useful for the end user: https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/SCLo https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/SCLo/CollectionsList Then once the right package is installed the user can see there is php54, php55 and rh-php56 packages but it's not clear why the difference in the naming and there's nothing that highlights to someone that if they want to use php55 or rh-php56 they'll need to handle a migration to rh-httpd24 as well. I'd suggest the first step is to have centos-release-scl obsolete centos-release-SCL so that users are not left on an unmaintained repository. Then as I gather data for my article I'd really like to flesh out and improve the 'user facing' SCL wiki page. Thoughts on this? James

4 7

Important infra outage notification - dates to be discussed
by Fabian Arrotin 20 May '16

20 May '16

Due to some reorganization at the DC/Cage level, we'll have to shutdown/move/reconfigure a big part of our hosted infra for the following services : - cbs.centos.org (Koji) - accounts.centos.org (auth backend) - ci.centos.org (jenkins-driven CI environment) We're working on a plan to minimize the downtime/reconfiguration part, but at first sight, due to the hardware move of the racks/recabling parts/etc, the announced downtime will be probably ~48h. What does that mean ? That during this window, nobody will be able to build/tests packages, nor be able to triggers automatically CI jobs (important). As said, we're working on an agenda with the team operating the DC, but we'd like you (cbs and ci users) to give us feedback on the best (or worst ?) time line for such migration. For example if you know that your $project will have a release soon, and already have an agenda for such release (and so build/ci) and that you rely on that infra, we'd like you to communicate those informations to us, so that we can try to find the best possible time slot for the migration, minimizing the impact on the whole CentOS ecosystem (and so for all our users) Feel free to answer in this thread, or find us in #centos-devel on freenode. -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab

1 0

CentOS Atomic Host test images
by Jason Brooks 19 May '16

19 May '16

There are test images available for what will be the next CentOS Atomic Host release: https://ci.centos.org/artifacts/sig-atomic/downstream/images/ After we've done some testing, we'll update the official CentOS Atomic Host ostree repo, probably early next week, and announce the release. We're going to hold off on producing new release images for a week or so, in order to sync up with the regular monthly centos media refresh cycle. These test images include two versions of docker: docker-1.9.1-40 and docker-latest-1.10.3-22.1. To read more about docker vs. docker-latest, see: https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2016-May/014731.html. For your non-atomic needs, these docker pkgs, along with the other content included in these images, are now available in the standard centos repositories -- docker, kubernetes and most of the other "atomic" pkgs live in the extras repo. Happy testing, Jason

1 0

[Fwd: [CentOS] ati fglrx vs amdgpu absolutely mad on R5 m255 vs IRIS P520]
by Andreas Benzler 19 May '16

19 May '16

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel