Hello all,
I'm seeing this behaviour since I did `yum update` today on one of my
CentOS 7 boxes in that, `vagrant up` for libvirt provider throws the error:
"The provider 'libvirt' could not be found, but was requested to
back the machine 'default'. Please use a provider that exists."
Details of the issue can be found on [1]. I observed the issue when I
was doing testing for Atomic Developer Bundle (ADB) [2].
Besides that, earlier, one needed to install only two packages -
centos-release-scl and sclo-vagrant1 - to use Vagrant. But now it seems
to have changed and we need to install sclo-vagrant1-vagrant-libvirt as
well as few other packages/dependencies to make it work. I modified my
Ansible playbook [3] which reflects the set of packages I had to add.
What I'm here to understand is that, am I doing something obviously
wrong here to make things work or, did I miss some notification on this
list that had details about the changes? Or is this some kind of
unexpected behaviour?
Thanks!
[1]
https://github.com/projectatomic/adb-atomic-developer-bundle/issues/383#iss…
[2] https://github.com/projectatomic/adb-atomic-developer-bundle
[3]
https://github.com/dharmit/adb-ci-ansible/commit/1da0cbc6961c8161981a15b9d2…
Regards,
Dharmit.
Hi,
there is an integration in place with Gluster, NFS-Ganesha and
Pacemaker. This combination makes it possible to have an active-active
high-available NFS-server backed by Gluster volumes.
We'd like to add automated testing for functional fail-over in the CI.
This requires the use of virtual-IPs that get assigned to the different
NFS-Ganesha servers, which will migrate to other servers upon failure.
On https://wiki.centos.org/QaWiki/PubHardware is a mentioning of
"reserved IP addresses" where the Gluster project in the CI would like
to get listed too. What is the process to request a few IPs, and what
are the restrictions we need to be aware of (and how to put them in the
Jenkins job)?
Thanks,
Niels
The meeting will be at 13:00 UTC (9:00 EST, 15:00 Brno) in #centos-devel
on Freenode.
Agenda:
* setting up Jenkins for Github PRs
* anything else?
Honza
I'm trying to get ticket #0010838 fixed[1] which would allow
centos-release-scl (and -rh) to be used unaltered on RHEL to access the
SCLo SIG's repositories. Not all RHELs have the upstream RHSCL repos,
and there are additional collections published by the SIG that are useful.
In the Foreman project I'd like to mirror this RPM to provide
centos-release-scl for all EL users during installation to get access to
SCLo builds and rebuilds. I'm aware of the RHEL centos-release-sclo
builds in Copr[2], but they remove centos-release-rh and I'm trying to
ensure the same RPMs can be used on all EL builds.
The baseurl in the package is
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/sclo/$basearch/sclo/, which
on RHEL Server expands to .../centos/7Server/sclo/. Only the "7"
directory exists on the mirror.
Either the mirror could contain symlinks for 7Server -> 7, or the
release repo file[3] could be built with the URL hardcoded without using
$releasever, which was suggested in today's CBS IRC meeting.
Does anybody have any strong preference? If not, I'd like to suggest we
change the release repo file.
[1]https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=10838
[2]https://github.com/sclorg/centos-release-scl#readme
[3]https://github.com/alphacc/centos-release-sclo/blob/master/CentOS-SCLo.re…
--
Dominic Cleal
dominic(a)cleal.org
Hi,
I saw no announcement on centos-announce
for this:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0997.html
has it fallen through the cracks somehow?
I find the corresponding update for EL7, but not for EL6.
It would be nice if someone could investigate this.
I also didn't find the necessary versions on my local mirror synced, e.g.:
qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.491.el6_8.1.x86_64.rpm
Is this due to the work done in preparation for EL 6.8 release?
But I also do not find any CR repo yet.
As this is an important update I'd like to know if there is help
needed to get it out faster.
--
Mit freundlichen GrĂĽĂźen / Regards
Sven Kieske
Systemadministrator
Mittwald CM Service GmbH & Co. KG
Königsberger Straße 6
32339 Espelkamp
T: +495772 293100
F: +495772 293333
https://www.mittwald.de
Geschäftsführer: Robert Meyer
St.Nr.: 331/5721/1033, USt-IdNr.: DE814773217, HRA 6640, AG Bad Oeynhausen
Komplementärin: Robert Meyer Verwaltungs GmbH, HRB 13260, AG Bad Oeynhausen
All-
I'd like the maintainers of the CentOSplus kernel to enable
the CONFIG_NET_9P_RDMA, CONFIG_9P_FSCACHE, and CONFIG_9P_FS_POSIX_ACL
config options. How do I ask for that? Bugzilla?
Thank you
Hans
Hi guys,
we would like to chat abu the different possibilities of SCL Prefixes:
/opt/centos
/opt/centos-sig-configmgt
/opt/centos/sig-configmgt
/opt/centos/sig-configmgt-hiera44
/opt/centos-sig-configmgt/hiera44
/opt/centos/sig-configmgt/hiera44
What is your opinion about this?
My preference would go to /opt/centos/sig-configmgt-ruby22.
Please remember that ze do not plan to expose that to users (e.g puppet
will be installed in /usr, not in a SCL). However, those SCL will be
used for dependencies and/or rebuilds of EPEL packages.
--
(o- Julien Pivotto
//\ Config Management SIG
V_/_ https://frama.link/cfgmgmt
Hi all,
We seem to be now getting many mails to the list about builds (with
failures) and projects that do not directly relate to centos
development. Are these proper for dev list at all? Should we not have
these mails on a centos-customs/centos-customs-devel list?
Regards
Phil
--
Irregulars Engineering
Leigh, Lancashire, UK
Email: philwyett(a)irregulars-engineering.com
Web: https://www.irregulars-engineering.com
Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/irregulars_eng