devel

devel@lists.centos.org

10 participants
4617 discussions

Re: [CentOS-devel] CentOS7 minimal install ISO
by Vincent Van der Kussen 15 Jul '14

15 Jul '14

On Jul 15, 2014 3:52 PM, Fabian Arrotin <fabian.arrotin(a)arrfab.net> wrote: > > On 15/07/14 15:14, vincent(a)vanderkussen.org wrote: > <snip> > > Hi, > > > > If possible, it would be nice to have "libselinux-python" included to > > keep > > Ansible users happy :-). Although I don't know how much deps it requires > > on el7. > > > > Regards, > > Vincent > > > > Hi Vincent, > > It's installed by default now, so yes, it's included in the packages > manifest on the iso minimal. > > Cheers, > -- > Fabian Arrotin > gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab Hi Fabian, Parfait! Vincent

1 0

Delta RPMs disabled by default?
by Mustafa Muhammad 13 Jul '14

13 Jul '14

Hi, I installed CentOS 7 today, congratulations, and thank you for this fast release. I found a problem (or a design decision?), deltarpm is not installed by default (minimal install), when I ran "yum distro-sync" I got: Delta RPMs disabled because /usr/bin/applydeltarpm not installed. deltarpm is important to me (and anybody with limited bandwidth), so is this intended or simply a bug? Regards

15 38

Centpkg: Demo and Roadmap Hangout (16-Jul, 15:00 UTC)
by Brian Stinson 12 Jul '14

12 Jul '14

Hi All, There will be a demo of Centpkg and a short discussion of the development roadmap Wednesday, July 16th at 15:00 UTC at the following Google Hangout: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B3hoTkHRFMc To convert this appointment to your local time run: date -d '2014-07-16 15:00 UTC' Agenda: - Short Demo of Current centpkg functionality - Questions - Next steps - How do we distribute pyrpkg without conflicting with epel? - How do we integrate properly with the CBS? - Getting quick feedback and adding new features - Anything else? Hope to see you there! Brian -- Brian Stinson bstinson(a)ksu.edu | IRC: bstinson | Bitbucket/Twitter: bstinsonmhk

1 0

Processing bugs - Possible new status addition
by Phil Wyett 11 Jul '14

11 Jul '14

Hi all, This morning the discussion of certain statuses for bugs came up in #centos-devel on IRC. Scenario: - Bug reported. For argument an aged bug that is >= 1 point release lower than current point release for the bug. - Bug cannot be reproduced on same major release/current point release. - Reporter asked for feedback - Do they still have the issue? etc. - Feedback does not come in 6 months. At this point it was decided the bug should not be closed, but an appropriate status be assigned. Current statuses do not really cover the above scenario. One suggestion on IRC was a status of: CLOSED_NOFEEDBACK Thoughts, ideas, suggestions? Regards Phil

4 5

[PATCH] Added option to set explicit %dist per request
by Pat Riehecky 10 Jul '14

10 Jul '14

From: Pat Riehecky <riehecky(a)fnal.gov> --- into_srpm.sh | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++------------ 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/into_srpm.sh b/into_srpm.sh index 6ff2260..8c2434c 100755 --- a/into_srpm.sh +++ b/into_srpm.sh @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ ##################################################################### usage() { echo '' >&2 - echo "$0 [-htq] [-b branch] [-c shasum]" >&2 + echo "$0 [-hqts] [-d dist] [-b branch] [-c shasum]" >&2 echo '' >&2 echo 'You need to run this from inside a sources git repo' >&2 echo '' >&2 @@ -22,6 +22,8 @@ usage() { echo ' -t: Set srpm timestamp to commit date' >&2 echo ' -s: Allow building as a SCL style package' >&2 echo '' >&2 + echo ' -d: Use this %{dist} instead of automatic value'>&2 + echo '' >&2 echo ' -b: specify a branch to examine' >&2 echo " defaults to repo's current branch" >&2 echo " NOTE: your repo will be set to this branch">&2 @@ -32,6 +34,8 @@ usage() { echo '' >&2 echo " $0" >&2 echo " $0 -b c7 -t" >&2 + echo " $0 -b c7 -s" >&2 + echo " $0 -b c7 -d yourdisthere" >&2 echo " $0 -b remotes/origin/c7" >&2 echo " $0 -c 865ae5909b2b5d5fb37971b7ad7960f1fd5a5ffa" >&2 echo " $0 -b c7 -c 865ae5909b2b5d5fb37971b7ad7960f1fd5a5ffa" >&2 @@ -45,13 +49,14 @@ KEEPTIMESTAMP=0 ALLOWSCL=0 COMMITHASH="" BRANCH="" +DIST='' ##################################################################### # setup args in the right order for making getopt evaluation # nice and easy. You'll need to read the manpages for more info # utilizing 'while' construct rather than 'for arg' to avoid unnecessary # shifting of program args -args=$(getopt -o htsqb:c: -- "$@") +args=$(getopt -o htsqb:c:d: -- "$@") eval set -- "$args" while [[ 0 -eq 0 ]]; do @@ -76,6 +81,11 @@ while [[ 0 -eq 0 ]]; do ALLOWSCL=1 shift ;; + -d ) + # Set %{dist} to this instead the automatic value + DIST=$2 + shift + ;; -c ) # Use this commit id COMMITHASH=$2 @@ -118,12 +128,6 @@ if [[ $? -ne 0 ]]; then exit 1 fi -which get_sources.sh >/dev/null 2>&1 -if [[ $? -ne 0 ]]; then - echo 'You need get_sources.sh from centos-git-common in PATH' >&2 - exit 1 -fi - which show_possible_srpms.sh >/dev/null 2>&1 if [[ $? -ne 0 ]]; then echo 'You need show_possible_srpms.sh from centos-git-common in PATH' >&2 @@ -180,10 +184,14 @@ fi # build our rpmopts list RPMOPTS="-bs --nodeps" -if [[ ${QUIET} -eq 1 ]]; then - DIST=$(return_disttag.sh -q) -else - DIST=$(return_disttag.sh) + +# determine automatically unless we've got one set +if [[ "x${DIST}" == 'x' ]]; then + if [[ ${QUIET} -eq 1 ]]; then + DIST=$(return_disttag.sh -q) + else + DIST=$(return_disttag.sh) + fi fi # put it all together -- 1.7.1

2 1

[PATCH 0/2] A few updates to into_srpm.sh
by Pat Riehecky 10 Jul '14

10 Jul '14

From: Pat Riehecky <riehecky(a)fnal.gov> Just adding a few simple features to into_srpm.sh It now works with software collecions, but only if you want. I've also added a switch for "preserving" the timestamps of srpms created by this script, based on the the commit timestamp. It is off by default as I'm not sure how comfortable various users are with this script making 'old' files. I've found it useful to be able to 'ls -ltr' in a source directory. Pat Riehecky (2): Added switch to preserve timestamps on creation of SRPMs for ls -ltr Now (optionally) supports software collections into_srpm.sh | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- 1 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

2 3

centos old repos c7.00.02 and c7.00.00
by Farkas Levente 10 Jul '14

10 Jul '14

hi, is there any way to make the old c7.00.02 and c7.00.00 centos repos available? currently many i686 packages missing from c7.00.03 and c7.00.04, but without these packages none of the i686 packages cab be build. regards. -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"

2 15

[PATCH] don't assume specfile name matches package name in get_sources
by Mike McLean 10 Jul '14

10 Jul '14

Some packages (notably SCL packages) do not specfile=%{name}.spec, so we shouldn't assume or assert this in get_sources.

4 4

[PATCH] kernel: add in a debranding patch
by Akemi Yagi 09 Jul '14

09 Jul '14

Hope this is the correct format for patch submission. Akemi

1 0

EPEL 7 in Extra Repo
by Roozbeh Shafiee 09 Jul '14

09 Jul '14

Hi folks today CentOS 7 released and when do we have epel-release package in extra repository? thanks -- Roozbeh Shafiee Linux/BSD System Administrator and Python Developer RoozbehShafiee.Com

10 16

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel