devel

devel@lists.centos.org

7 participants
4616 discussions

re/building Samba from git sources
by lejeczek 25 Apr '20

25 Apr '20

Hi devel, I'm looking for some help with this below which should be rather simple. $ git clone https://git.centos.org/rpms/samba.git $ git checkout c8 $ sudo dnf builddep SPECS/samba.spec Last metadata expiration check: 0:03:40 ago on Thu 23 Apr 2020 14:13:34 BST. Package gawk-4.2.1-1.el8.x86_64 is already installed. Package gcc-8.3.1-4.5.el8.x86_64 is already installed. Package gnupg2-2.2.9-1.el8.x86_64 is already installed. Package gnutls-devel-3.6.8-8.el8.x86_64 is already installed. Package krb5-devel-1.17-9.el8.x86_64 is already installed. Package libldb-devel-1.5.4-2.el8.x86_64 is already installed. Package libtalloc-devel-2.1.16-3.el8.x86_64 is already installed. Package libtasn1-devel-4.13-3.el8.x86_64 is already installed. Package libtdb-devel-1.3.18-2.el8.x86_64 is already installed. Package libtevent-devel-0.9.39-2.el8.x86_64 is already installed. Package libuuid-devel-2.32.1-17.el8.x86_64 is already installed. Package libxslt-1.1.32-3.el8.x86_64 is already installed. Package ncurses-devel-6.1-7.20180224.el8.x86_64 is already installed. Package perl-Archive-Tar-2.30-1.el8.noarch is already installed. Package perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-1:7.34-1.el8.noarch is already installed. Package perl-Test-Simple-1:1.302135-1.el8.noarch is already installed. Package perl-interpreter-4:5.26.3-416.el8.x86_64 is already installed. Package python36-devel-3.6.8-2.module_el8.1.0+245+c39af44f.x86_64 is already installed. No matching package to install: 'python3-ldb-devel >= 1.5.4' No matching package to install: 'python3-talloc-devel >= 2.1.16' Package python3-tdb-1.3.18-2.el8.x86_64 is already installed. Package python3-tevent-0.9.39-2.el8.x86_64 is already installed. No matching package to install: 'quota-devel' Package readline-devel-7.0-10.el8.x86_64 is already installed. Package sed-4.5-1.el8.x86_64 is already installed. Package xz-5.2.4-3.el8.x86_64 is already installed. Package zlib-devel-1.2.11-10.el8.x86_64 is already installed. Not all dependencies satisfied Error: Some packages could not be found. Missing packages are really missing or something wrong with Git's Samba? many thanks, L.

7 17

where to find Python devel packages
by lejeczek 25 Apr '20

25 Apr '20

hi guys How to get these two for example: python3-talloc-devel python3-ldb-devel Should these be available, exist in repos? It seems like they should, since a few things during rpmbuild call those two explicitly as dependencies. many thanks, L.

3 2

Question: Gluster v7.4 package build status
by Strahil Nikolov 23 Apr '20

23 Apr '20

Hello CentOS Storage SIG, Can someone tell me how I can check the build status of the Gluster v7.4 packages ? Best Regards, Strahil Nikolov

3 7

conflicts in yum repos
by lejeczek 21 Apr '20

21 Apr '20

hi everyone. dnf updates collide: $ dnf update corosynclib Last metadata expiration check: 0:19:02 ago on Fri 17 Apr 2020 14:57:48 BST. Error: Problem: problem with installed package corosync-3.0.2-3.el8_1.1.x86_64 - package corosync-3.0.2-3.el8_1.1.x86_64 requires corosynclib(x86-64) = 3.0.2-3.el8_1.1, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both corosynclib-3.0.3-2.el8.x86_64 and corosynclib-3.0.2-3.el8_1.1.x86_64 - cannot install the best update candidate for package corosynclib-3.0.2-3.el8_1.1.x86_64 (try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages or '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages) $ dnf list corosynclib --showduplicates Last metadata expiration check: 0:18:45 ago on Fri 17 Apr 2020 14:57:48 BST. Installed Packages corosynclib.x86_64 3.0.2-3.el8_1.1 @AppStream Available Packages corosynclib.i686 3.0.2-3.el8 AppStream corosynclib.x86_64 3.0.2-3.el8 AppStream corosynclib.i686 3.0.2-3.el8_1.1 AppStream corosynclib.i686 3.0.2-3.el8_1.1 HighAvailability corosynclib.x86_64 3.0.2-3.el8_1.1 AppStream corosynclib.i686 3.0.3-2.el8 Stream-AppStream corosynclib.x86_64 3.0.3-2.el8 Stream-AppStream It cannot be that those(some of?) repos exclude each other, right? many thanks, L.

5 11

[Cloud SIG]: Building updated RPMs for OpenStack Client and SDK for CentOS 7
by Nils.Magnus＠t-systems.com 20 Apr '20

20 Apr '20

Hi CentOS developers, especially Cloud SIG team, tl;dr: I need some help in packaging Python3 packages available in PyPI for CentOS 7. Details: we are a public cloud provider based on OpenStack and many of our customers and partners unfortunately still request CentOS 7 images for their VMs. In my team we support the upstream development of OpenStack SDK and OpenStack Client (both seem to be de facto one combined team now) and also provide some extensions specific to our cloud (via a plugin mechanism in recent releases of the SDK). Our clients frequently ask for updated RPMs for CentOS 7. I wonder if you as CentOS community at large are interested in having them as well, or, if not, if you could point me in the right direction how to build them. One major conflict I am currently struggling with is that virtually all Python 2.7 code is not only no longer supported (due to a community goal in OpenStack), but actually removed (which is in itself a good decision, no doubt about it). The mentioned packages work well with Python 3, but as I understand it, Python 3 is not available by vanilla CentOS 7. The affected packages are available in PyPI: * https://pypi.org/project/openstacksdk/ (version 0.46.0) * https://pypi.org/project/python-openstackclient/ (version 5.2.0, not to be confused with "openstackclient" without the "python-" prefix, which is stuck at 4.0.0) * https://pypi.org/project/otcextensions/ (version 0.6.9, but this our own business) They are all easily installed with "pip" once you have a Python 3 environment, but draw a total of 100 other packages as dependencies. Could you please advise how to proceed if someone insists on RPMs for those? Thank you + Regards, /Nils

4 3

CPE Weekly: 2020-04-18
by Aoife Moloney 18 Apr '20

18 Apr '20

--- title: CPE Weekly status email tags: CPE Weekly, email --- # CPE Weekly 2020-04-18 Background: The Community Platform Engineering group is the Red Hat team combining IT and release engineering from Fedora and CentOS. Check out our team's info here https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/cpe/ ## GitForge Updates We are still actively engaging with the Fedora Council and have not made any further progress with this project. We are focusing on ensuring we have captured the most granular of requirements before further engaging with GitLab by rereviewing what we have gathered so far and requesting more specific technical clarifications on some. We are also as a team discussing the best way to track the updates on this project publicly and hope to have something published early next week. We will send an email to the devel list as soon as we have agreed and created this. Thank you for your patience and engagement with us thus far. ## Fedora Updates * Fedora 32 release: RC 1.3 was tested this week * Go/No-Go meeting happened on Thursday 16th April - decision:No Go https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-announce@lists.fedorapr… ### Data Centre Move * Please note Communishift is now down and is en route to the datacentre in RDU-CC. * We have a list of affected services that will be in effect from May 25th - July 1st (est) as part of the full datacentre move. You can view that list here https://hackmd.io/hpYYJQRjQy-oHxUS7IonIA * As always, please view our public schedule here for more a more detailed overview https://hackmd.io/@fedorainfra2020/rJpsA4FLL#First-draft-of-schedule-for-PH… ### AAA Replacement * The team officially kicked off phase two of the project development today. * They are going to look at applications that currently use the FAS client to change their codebase to the FASJSON client post production. * The team are also working on adding a python library to the API so that this maps to python objects easily. * They are also working on API endpoints, specifically to be able to retrieve the open-api specification in JSON format & provide a health endpoint for monitoring tools. * Our work is publicly tracked here if you want to find out more https://github.com/orgs/fedora-infra/projects/6 ### CI/CD * rpmautospec is available for testing in staging, find more info here https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-announce@lists.fedorapr… ### Sustaining Team * The team are looking at creating a ticket dashboard for tickets and have reused most the fedora-gather-easyfix code base to work on this * https://fedorapeople.org/~humaton/cpe/ * Some cool stats about tickets from the infra repo here https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedorapr… * Mbbox: * Review koji-hub CRD PR https://github.com/fedora-infra/mbbox/pull/19 Starting to play around with koji-ansible collections for releng work (here). Automation of the openh264 packages. ## CentOS Updates ### CentOS * CentOS CI - stable with 0 downtime * 7.8 QA tree is being tested by CentOS QA folks ### CentOS Stream * The team are working on having Stream be publically consumable in the coming months, with SIG enablement so watch the devel lists for more technical updates as and when they are announced! As always, feedback is welcome, and we will continue to look at ways to improve the delivery and readability of this weekly report. Have a great weekend! Aoife Source: https://hackmd.io/gSci385uRoeNVEuoNUS1pg?view -- Aoife Moloney Product Owner Community Platform Engineering Team Red Hat EMEA Communications House Cork Road Waterford

1 0

Re: [CentOS-devel] New KDE available for testing on CentOS Stream
by Andy Hall 15 Apr '20

15 Apr '20

> Message: 8 > Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 13:36:45 -0700 > From: Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com> > To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel(a)centos.org> > Subject: [CentOS-devel] New KDE available for testing on CentOS Stream > Message-ID: > <CAKndyUTRpN_fsqs2o1CGbnGSOMAtmOso=rJS3mjxp4masnqQhw(a)mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > CentOS Stream has recently been updated to include the updated > qt5-5.12.5 that will be part of RHEL 8.2. The qt5-5.12.* releases are > the LTS version of qt5, we this very good news. > > The problem is that the KDE packages in EPEL were built on qt5-5.11.*, > and many of them won't install on 5.12. > > I have rebuilt KDE for RHEL 8.2 x86_64 and have it in my Fedora people area. > I have updated all the added qt5 packages to be 5.12.*, to match the > qt5-5.12 in RHEL 8.2. > I have also updated most of the plasma packages to 5.18.*. This is > the corresponding plasma LTS release that goes with qt5-5.12. > I have also updated most of the kf5 packages to 5.67.* / 19.12 . > There is no LTS release for the kf5 packages, there were the latest at > the time I was rebuilding them. > > In summary, this is a new shiny KDE Plasma Desktop. > > It would be great if people could test it before RHEL 8.2 / CentOS 8.2 > comes out. Hey Troy now the qt packages have been updated to 5.12 do we have a date for the 8.2 release as I'd like to just "dnf groupinstall KDE" for a shiny new ( stable ) desktop but right now this will fail :-( Thanks !

3 4

.config file for pxeboot kernel
by Christoph 15 Apr '20

15 Apr '20

Hi where I can find the .config file for the pxeboot kernel of centos 8? -- ------ Greetz

2 4

On leaving Red Hat
by Jim Perrin 15 Apr '20

15 Apr '20

When I joined Red Hat in 2013, it was to help CentOS facilitate open source communities such as RDO, oVirt, and others. In the years since, my goal grew to include helping Red Hat develop more openly, and to help align the value CentOS provides with the needs of Red Hat. With Red Hat’s increased investment, focus, and interest in CentOS Stream, I feel like this has been successful. While the work is far from finished, I’m confident that the CentOS team in coordination with other RHEL teams will see it through. Much like Mary Poppins, when people you’re helping are doing the right things, it’s time to move on. Therefore, I intend to leave Red Hat, and my last day will be May 8th. While I’ve very much enjoyed causing trouble at the Hat, it’s time for me to put this skill to use elsewhere. Don't worry or read too much into this. I’m not going far, and I’ll still be active in the community. -- Jim Perrin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77

1 0

Centos Storage SIG Meeting Time
by Francesco Pantano 15 Apr '20

15 Apr '20

Hello everyone, as per last meeting I'm writing to get feedback on what the best meeting time would be for all parties interested in participating in the Centos Storage SIG meeting. Currently we have a monthly scheduled meeting on Tuesday at 1000 UTC, but sounds like it's not ideal for a bunch of folks and we should consider changing it to allow a wider audience. For this reason I've created a doodle that will run for one week [1]. In this Doodle, I'd like folks to vote on whatever time works best for them, then we can just choose the time with the highest number of votes and change the calendar accordingly. Note: I excluded 1400 and 1500 UTC from this doodle since two meetings are running at that time [3]. @Giulio Fidente <gfidente(a)redhat.com> and @Niels de Vos <ndevos(a)redhat.com> if anything is missing. Thanks, Francesco [1] https://www.centos.org/minutes/2020/April/centos-meeting.2020-04-07-10.06.h… [2] https://doodle.com/poll/pixtyzsxwemny48s [3] https://centos.org/community/calendar/ -- Francesco Pantano GPG KEY: F41BD75C

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel