On 7/6/20 3:55 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Hi,
never been involved with the nfv sig,
Karanbir, looks like you are the only one in the adminstrator role of sig-nfv.
regards
On 06/07/2020 14:23, Alfredo Moralejo Alonso wrote:
Adding kb as NFV Sig chair.
What needs to be done to get this moving on?, some maintainers (including myself) have requested access to nfv-sig group but there has been no response.
What's the status of NFV SIG?
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 2:32 PM Dominik Holler <Dominik.Holler@gmx.net mailto:Dominik.Holler@gmx.net> wrote:
> From: Alfredo Moralejo Alonso <amoralej@redhat.com <mailto:amoralej@redhat.com> > <mailto:amoralej@redhat.com <mailto:amoralej@redhat.com>>> > Date: Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 1:24 PM > Subject: [CentOS-devel] Rebuilding OpenvSwitch and OVN from Fast > DataPath in NFV Sig > To: The CentOS developers mailing list. <centos-devel@centos.org <mailto:centos-devel@centos.org> > <mailto:centos-devel@centos.org <mailto:centos-devel@centos.org>>> > > > Hi, > > During the last years OpenVswitch and OVN have become a major > dependency for several projects and SIGs in the CentOS ecosystem, > including OpenStack, oVirt and OpenShift. During this time each > project has been following its own way with limited coordination > (just some opportunistic cross-tagging between SIGs) and different > approaches, rebuilding Fedora builds or FDP srpms from ftp.redhat.com <http://ftp.redhat.com> > <http://ftp.redhat.com> > from time to time in their own tags and repos. > > This has led to multiple issues and suboptimal usage resources so I > think a good step ahead would be to use existing NFV SIG [1] as a > collaboration area for all the interested projects to build, test and > ship OpenvSwitch and OVN using public SRPMs from Fast Datapath [2]. > > What I'm proposing is that the interested people in becoming > maintainers for OVS/OVN in NFV Sig request membership to nfv-sig group > [3]. Then, we'll coordinate to request new tags/buildroots for OVS/OVN > and start building and testing the required releases. > > Any thoughts on this proposal? > I think this would be efficient. I already applied to become a member of sig-nfv to help. > Best regards, > > Alfredo > > > [1] https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/NFV > [2] > ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/8Base/en/Fast-Datapath/SRPMS/ > [3] https://accounts.centos.org/group/members/sig-nfv > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel@centos.org <mailto:CentOS-devel@centos.org> <mailto:CentOS-devel@centos.org <mailto:CentOS-devel@centos.org>> > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > > > -- > Didi >
Il giorno lun 6 lug 2020 alle ore 19:34 Dominik Holler < Dominik.Holler@gmx.net> ha scritto:
On 7/6/20 3:55 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Hi,
never been involved with the nfv sig,
Karanbir, looks like you are the only one in the adminstrator role of sig-nfv.
Adding +Fabian Arrotin arrfab@centos.org to the loop
regards
On 06/07/2020 14:23, Alfredo Moralejo Alonso wrote:
Adding kb as NFV Sig chair.
What needs to be done to get this moving on?, some maintainers (including myself) have requested access to nfv-sig group but there has been no response.
What's the status of NFV SIG?
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 2:32 PM Dominik Holler <Dominik.Holler@gmx.net mailto:Dominik.Holler@gmx.net> wrote:
> From: Alfredo Moralejo Alonso <amoralej@redhat.com <mailto:amoralej@redhat.com> > <mailto:amoralej@redhat.com <mailto:amoralej@redhat.com>>> > Date: Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 1:24 PM > Subject: [CentOS-devel] Rebuilding OpenvSwitch and OVN from Fast > DataPath in NFV Sig > To: The CentOS developers mailing list. <centos-devel@centos.org <mailto:centos-devel@centos.org> > <mailto:centos-devel@centos.org <mailto:centos-devel@centos.org> > > Hi, > > During the last years OpenVswitch and OVN have become a major > dependency for several projects and SIGs in the CentOS ecosystem, > including OpenStack, oVirt and OpenShift. During this time each > project has been following its own way with limited coordination > (just some opportunistic cross-tagging between SIGs) and different > approaches, rebuilding Fedora builds or FDP srpms from ftp.redhat.com <http://ftp.redhat.com> > <http://ftp.redhat.com> > from time to time in their own tags and repos. > > This has led to multiple issues and suboptimal usage resources soI
> think a good step ahead would be to use existing NFV SIG [1] as a > collaboration area for all the interested projects to build, testand
> ship OpenvSwitch and OVN using public SRPMs from Fast Datapath[2].
> > What I'm proposing is that the interested people in becoming > maintainers for OVS/OVN in NFV Sig request membership to nfv-siggroup
> [3]. Then, we'll coordinate to request new tags/buildroots forOVS/OVN
> and start building and testing the required releases. > > Any thoughts on this proposal? > I think this would be efficient. I already applied to become a member of sig-nfv to help. > Best regards, > > Alfredo > > > [1] https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/NFV > [2] >ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/8Base/en/Fast-Datapath/SRPMS/
> [3] https://accounts.centos.org/group/members/sig-nfv > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel@centos.org <mailto:CentOS-devel@centos.org> <mailto:CentOS-devel@centos.org <mailto:CentOS-devel@centos.org>> > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > > > -- > Didi >
CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
On 07/07/2020 08:55, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
<snip>
Adding +Fabian Arrotin mailto:arrfab@centos.org to the loop
Can we stop doing this please ? I'm *already* subscribed to this list, so no need to add me *again* in a thread that I can read.
And process is still the same : SIG Chair has to ack new members, and because it seems SIG chair isn't active/responding (Thomas Herbert per https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/NFV wiki page), it has to go to Board to revoke SIG chair access, find new one etc, so *nothing* at my level.
FWIW, someone already reported that to the board so that they can take action : https://git.centos.org/centos/board/issue/18
Kind Regards,
On 7/6/20 1:34 PM, Dominik Holler wrote:
On 7/6/20 3:55 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Hi,
never been involved with the nfv sig,
Karanbir, looks like you are the only one in the adminstrator role of sig-nfv.
I was chair of NFV SIG and active until early 2019. I let it lapse because there was no interest and no attendance at meetings and no packages because OVS was built elsewhere. There was no interest in DPDK and RH pulled out of VPP/fd.io and ODL.
I have not been paying close attention to the mailing list for a few months. Alfredo reached out to me and I am happy to help any way I can.
I have been building OVS 2.12.0 RPMs on my own server for CentOS8. I have a working package but had write a patch to disable check because the Py2/3 stuff didn't seem to be working very well. I haven't built anything in CBS for over a year.
regards
On 06/07/2020 14:23, Alfredo Moralejo Alonso wrote:
Adding kb as NFV Sig chair.
What needs to be done to get this moving on?, some maintainers (including myself) have requested access to nfv-sig group but there has been no response.
What's the status of NFV SIG?
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 2:32 PM Dominik Holler <Dominik.Holler@gmx.net mailto:Dominik.Holler@gmx.net> wrote:
> From: Alfredo Moralejo Alonso <amoralej@redhat.com <mailto:amoralej@redhat.com> > <mailto:amoralej@redhat.com <mailto:amoralej@redhat.com>>> > Date: Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 1:24 PM > Subject: [CentOS-devel] Rebuilding OpenvSwitch and OVN from Fast > DataPath in NFV Sig > To: The CentOS developers mailing list. <centos-devel@centos.org <mailto:centos-devel@centos.org> > <mailto:centos-devel@centos.org <mailto:centos-devel@centos.org>>> > > > Hi, > > During the last years OpenVswitch and OVN have become a major > dependency for several projects and SIGs in the CentOS ecosystem, > including OpenStack, oVirt and OpenShift. During this time each > project has been following its own way with limited coordination > (just some opportunistic cross-tagging between SIGs) and different > approaches, rebuilding Fedora builds or FDP srpms from ftp.redhat.com <http://ftp.redhat.com> > <http://ftp.redhat.com> > from time to time in their own tags and repos. > > This has led to multiple issues and suboptimal usage resources so I > think a good step ahead would be to use existing NFV SIG [1] as a > collaboration area for all the interested projects to build, test and > ship OpenvSwitch and OVN using public SRPMs from Fast Datapath [2]. > > What I'm proposing is that the interested people in becoming > maintainers for OVS/OVN in NFV Sig request membership to nfv-sig group > [3]. Then, we'll coordinate to request new tags/buildroots for OVS/OVN > and start building and testing the required releases. > > Any thoughts on this proposal? > I think this would be efficient. I already applied to become a member of sig-nfv to help. > Best regards, > > Alfredo > > > [1] https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/NFV > [2] > ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/8Base/en/Fast-Datapath/SRPMS/ > [3] https://accounts.centos.org/group/members/sig-nfv > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel@centos.org <mailto:CentOS-devel@centos.org> <mailto:CentOS-devel@centos.org <mailto:CentOS-devel@centos.org>> > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > > > -- > Didi >
CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
-
Dominik Holler -
Fabian Arrotin -
Sandro Bonazzola -
Thomas F Herbert