Re: [CentOS-devel] CentOS Plus / CentOS Extras Policy

Jim Perrin wrote:

Ideally some combination of time/feedback would seem to be the way to go. My fear is that if we require people to give feedback about something that's working, it won't happen and the package will rot in testing. 14 days is fine for moving things over I think, assuming no negative feedback is given.

+1

Or make that "+1/2" - no negative feedback doesn't mean, that someone tested it and the package didn't break his system, it could also mean that no one tested it. So there should be at least some form of positive feedback, just to make it clear that someone else than the packager *did* successfully install that package.

Ralph