On Jul 6, 2015 7:34 PM, "Jason Brooks" jbrooks@redhat.com wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lokesh Mandvekar" lsm5@fedoraproject.org To: centos-devel@centos.org Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2015 2:17:04 PM Subject: [CentOS-devel] Including rkt in virt7 - yay/nay?
Wondering if people would be ok with including rkt in virt7 SIG repos. some folks gave this a yay on IRC, but reaching out to the mailing list
as
well for more votes.
+1
+1 here too
rkt is _not_ in fedora yet and including it would also imply including systemd >= 220 in virt7 as it isn't present in base CentOS.
All the gory detail around rkt packaging for fedora can be found here: https://github.com/coreos/rkt/issues/686 . The main pending issue that fedora won't agree to right now is RE: installing the stage1 rootfs tarball at rpm install time.
WIP rpm files are here: https://github.com/fedora-cloud/rkt-rpm/ . I've
been
adding these to my copr repo here: https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/lsm5/rkt/ . markllama and
lalatenduM
might have something to add to this.
Lokesh Freenode, OFTC: lsm5 GPG: 0xC7C3A0DD
CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel