30 Jun
2008
30 Jun
'08
10:13 p.m.
On 07/01/2008 12:48 AM, seth vidal wrote:
> So, the answer is in an x86_64 install you need to add .x86_64 to your > install commands. > You want to update that bug report mentioned above? Or should I do that? Should that be closed as "Not a bug"?
I've confirmed this on a box here - it's weird - the codepath should be identical - I'm doing a bit more spelunking.
Thank you.
okay - it's fixed in 3.2.X in git - probably working in 3.2.16, too - but not in 3.2.8.
Could that be marked to become fixed as part of RHEL 5.3 ?
I think that's roughly in the plan but I'm not a rhel decider of any kind.
any chance of having this version of yum in centosplus ?