15 Nov
2016
15 Nov
'16
3:28 p.m.
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 5:20 PM, Lamar Owen lowen@pari.edu wrote:
Karanbir Singh wrote:
if we were to try and resolve this without >removing rpms, what would that solution look like ?
Increment epoch. Almost as tasty as removing rpms.
incrementing epoch will cause a chain of other issues so I don't think it's the good way to go here.
CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
--
Sandro Bonazzola
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at redhat.com