Re: [CentOS-devel] CBS build tags and git branches names for SCL

On 03/16/2015 08:45 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:

On 16 March 2015 at 06:22, Honza Horak <hhorak@redhat.com mailto:hhorak@redhat.com> wrote:

On 03/11/2015 05:05 PM, Honza Horak wrote:


    I got the idea about 3rd repo in the end and this is the new
    workflow
    proposal:
    https://www.redhat.com/__archives/sclorg/2015-March/__msg00021.html
    <https://www.redhat.com/archives/sclorg/2015-March/msg00021.html>

    I'd be glad for any feedback..


Still no feedback?

Small update in the future RHSCL workflow:
https://www.redhat.com/__archives/sclorg/2015-March/__msg00030.html
<https://www.redhat.com/archives/sclorg/2015-March/msg00030.html>

Honza

Hi, I have looked over the proposals and they look good. At this point, I would say it is time to move beyond conjecture to a working model to figure out where humans are going to break it :).

Exactly. I've thought about what our chances are without authtag: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2015-March/013029.html

and hopefully we'll find some plan what may be done even now on tomorrow's meeting: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2015-March/013030.html

Honza