On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Joe Brockmeier jzb@redhat.com wrote:
On 01/15/2014 01:41 PM, Adam Miller wrote:
I don't think that's a fair claim to PaaS because PaaS can exist
completely
independently of IaaS but can at points have integration. I run OpenShift Origin at home on bare metal on spare hardware that I don't care to incur the overhead of virt or IaaS. Because of this I don't like to classify
PaaS
as an IaaS application.
Is this a typical production use, though? I ask seriously - I don't know how folks are deploying OpenShift and whether it requires IaaS to scale well.
I don't really know if you'd call it "typical" but I know of customers currently running OpenShift Enterprise on bare metal today.
Honestly the main reason I shy away from "typical" is because I don't personally have stats (I suppose I could try to find them) of how different OpenShift Origin and Enterprise users are deploying currently to define what is and isn't typical.
-AdamM
-- Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud & Storage Analyst jzb@redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/ _______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel