On 07/06/14 01:44, Karanbir Singh wrote:
hi,
Taking on board the community and environment expansion that is taking place around the CentOS project, the CentOS Board has been considering how best to accomodate these efforts.
I'm attaching here a plan put forward by the board towards that aim.
Thoughts ? Comments ?
I think that given the difficulty that we already have in persuading people to update to 6.$latest from 6.$prehistoric that produciing even more frequent variants is not such a good idea. If the SIGs need a versioning scheme for the layers on top of the base o/s then the new naming scheme sounds good for those but the core o/s, I believe, should stick with mirroring upstream release numbers.
T