For the record, we are also observing the same problem in CloudSIG openstack-antelope testing repo:
[MIRROR] libsodium-1.0.18-7.el9s.x86_64.rpm: Downloading successful, but checksum doesn't match. Calculated: 1f2a5abe61bdd68bcbee962cf9a3b81158d1e5b987b24f421cb902924d75bb89(sha256) Expected: 8147c75c0454e7e58f5ac3a351e08b8b734ac3ddef803885c085515523ad8327(sha256) (14/194): openstack-barbican-worker-16.0.0-2.el9s.noarch.rpm
2.1 kB/s | 8.4 kB 00:04 [MIRROR] python-oslo-cache-lang-3.3.1-1.el9s.noarch.rpm: Downloading successful, but checksum doesn't match. Calculated: 7344f476bdf799f62457a6a34bfee00a845656eca4b19429d25e97dfde1c2b38(sha256) Expected: 125622fdeb3a2e02aa4cdcbc25a9a631677aba4c4de97d823ddb3c5230ecb714(sha256) [MIRROR] python-oslo-concurrency-lang-5.1.1-2.el9s.noarch.rpm: Downloading successful, but checksum doesn't match. Calculated: cd53374a430a54df57a6482c2805e931dfd0030778a1a16fcf6e8b97a2dda69c(sha256) Expected: e0c44f79afc2568b30e85f3aeb128f375129694c77166bfa07a73c3bacd6bb53(sha256) [MIRROR] python-oslo-cache-lang-3.3.1-1.el9s.noarch.rpm: Downloading successful, but checksum doesn't match. Calculated: 7344f476bdf799f62457a6a34bfee00a845656eca4b19429d25e97dfde1c2b38(sha256) Expected: 125622fdeb3a2e02aa4cdcbc25a9a631677aba4c4de97d823ddb3c5230ecb714(sha256) [FAILED] python-oslo-cache-lang-3.3.1-1.el9s.noarch.rpm: No more mirrors to try - All mirrors were already tried without success
My recommendation for users hitting this so far in CloudSIG or NFV SIG is to move to release repos unless you want to explicitly test new packages recently added to -testing repo.
Alfredo
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 10:16 AM Alfredo Moralejo Alonso < amoralej@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi,
Apparently untagging/tagging packages in the -testing tag is helping to fix the issue in some packages (ovn22.12, openvswitch-selinux-extra-policy, ovn22.09) but not openvswitch3.1-3.1.0-23.el9s.
I'm currently untagging it to test the previous build.
Note that in NFV SIG we are building the same packages in C9S and RHEL9 buildroots with different disttag el9s vs el9. May this be related?
Alfredo
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 8:53 AM YATIN KAREL yatinkarel@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Seeing similar issues in Openstack CI[1].
For example:- $ sudo dnf install --repofrompath=tmp, https://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/9-stream/nfv/x86_64/openvswitch-2/ --enablerepo=tmp --disablerepo=* openvswitch3.1 Added tmp repo from https://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/9-stream/nfv/x86_64/openvswitch-2/ tmp 11 kB/s | 3.0 kB 00:00 Dependencies resolved.
================================================================================================================ Package Architecture Version Repository Size
================================================================================================================ Installing: openvswitch3.1 x86_64 3.1.0-23.el9s tmp 6.8 M Installing dependencies: openvswitch-selinux-extra-policy noarch 1.0-31.el9s tmp 14 k
Transaction Summary
================================================================================================================ Install 2 Packages
Total download size: 6.8 M Installed size: 22 M Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading Packages: [MIRROR] openvswitch-selinux-extra-policy-1.0-31.el9s.noarch.rpm: Downloading successful, but checksum doesn't match. Calculated: 8e2f3b2089ea33e20e3b2a76190f9facae77772fdb9dd72e9c3d3b426fc2edb9(sha256) Expected: 17e5200b2c4045b2060e094ff383317f5c55744eb482d91b1ae026d473b83dc2(sha256) [MIRROR] openvswitch-selinux-extra-policy-1.0-31.el9s.noarch.rpm: Downloading successful, but checksum doesn't match. Calculated: 8e2f3b2089ea33e20e3b2a76190f9facae77772fdb9dd72e9c3d3b426fc2edb9(sha256) Expected: 17e5200b2c4045b2060e094ff383317f5c55744eb482d91b1ae026d473b83dc2(sha256) [MIRROR] openvswitch-selinux-extra-policy-1.0-31.el9s.noarch.rpm: Downloading successful, but checksum doesn't match. Calculated: 8e2f3b2089ea33e20e3b2a76190f9facae77772fdb9dd72e9c3d3b426fc2edb9(sha256) Expected: 17e5200b2c4045b2060e094ff383317f5c55744eb482d91b1ae026d473b83dc2(sha256) [MIRROR] openvswitch-selinux-extra-policy-1.0-31.el9s.noarch.rpm: Downloading successful, but checksum doesn't match. Calculated: 8e2f3b2089ea33e20e3b2a76190f9facae77772fdb9dd72e9c3d3b426fc2edb9(sha256) Expected: 17e5200b2c4045b2060e094ff383317f5c55744eb482d91b1ae026d473b83dc2(sha256) [FAILED] openvswitch-selinux-extra-policy-1.0-31.el9s.noarch.rpm: No more mirrors to try - All mirrors were already tried without success (2/2): openvswitch3.1-3.1.0-23.el9s. 1% [- ] 68 kB/s | 109 kB 01:41 ETA The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful transaction. You can remove cached packages by executing 'dnf clean packages'. Error: Error downloading packages: openvswitch-selinux-extra-policy-1.0-31.el9s.noarch: Cannot download, all mirrors were already tried without success
[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/2020304
Thanks and Regards Yatin Karel
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 7:38 PM Fabian Arrotin arrfab@centos.org wrote:
On 19/05/2023 15:59, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
Il giorno ven 19 mag 2023 alle ore 15:52 Troy Dawson <
tdawson@redhat.com
mailto:tdawson@redhat.com> ha scritto:
Those don't sound like CentOS packages. Centos packages do not have dist tags of .el9s or .el8s Please check the repo's those are coming from and contact the respective repository owners.Those are from CentOS SIGs, https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=39630 https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=39630 https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=42936 https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=42936
Can you elaborate where you're seeing that ? you mentioned oVirt CI so outside of centos infra (or outside of CBS) How do you test , from which repo, etc ? It's true that packages in -testing are now signed (it was announced https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2023-May/142901.html) but is that for -release ? what about mirrormanager ?
-- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org gpg key: 17F3B7A1 | @arrfab[@fosstodon.org]
CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
-- Yatin Karel _______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel