--- Matt Hyclak hyclak@math.ohiou.edu wrote:
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 12:30:04PM +0200, Ralph Angenendt enlightened us:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Note: This is my attempt to solicit input for
package changes from the
public and not make unilateral decisions and
push them with only the
developers present.
If there is no discussion of this item on this
list by non-centos
developers, then I will revert back to making
bug changes based on only
what the developers think :P
Therefore, the people who want input into how
packages are updated need
to speak up.
So where are we now with this bug? Leaving it as
it is doesn't look like
an option, we had so far one person favoring
changing the kernel and the
rest looks a little bit indecisive :)
So are there any more opinions on this bug
(especially from non-centos
developers?).
Changing the default behavior of yum seems to make the most sense to me. We retain compatibility with upstream and still fix the problem for our users.
I am with that option too if the yum mantainer (jonny?) do not care to carry a yum patch for the rest of centos4 lives (centos3 do not have that problem? I do not have anyone to test :-( )
cu roger
__________________________________________ RedHat Certified Engineer ( RHCE ) Cisco Certified Network Associate ( CCNA )
____________________________________________________________________________________ Want to start your own business? Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business (http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com)