On Wed, Jun 19, 2019, at 11:47, Fabian Arrotin wrote:
On 19/06/2019 17:43, Brian Stinson wrote:
<snip> >> >> Does that mean having the add-ons like ha/rs going either to BaseOS (for >> simple packages) or to AppStream (if built as modules") ? > > There are some HA and RT components that are shipped to CentOS BaseOS, > but these are separate from the HighAvailability and RT variants in > upstream. We won't ship the HA or RT variants. >
I mean RS and not RT, but same concept/idea :) So do you mean that we have sources landed on git.centos.org, that we have eventually built but that we'll not ship ? If so that contrasts with what we used to do and would like to know why
-- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab
CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
*Attachments:*
- signature.asc
To say this a different way. If it gets pushed to a c8 branch, it goes in BaseOS (again, an oversimplification because there are 1 or 2 exceptions, but close enough). I'd like to *not* maintain HighAvailability/ResilientStorage/etc. as separate variant repos in CentOS.