4 Dec
2014
4 Dec
'14
4:56 p.m.
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 8:20 AM, Brian Stinson bstinson@ksu.edu wrote:
I'd much rather not do this for a couple reasons:
- CentOS Extras shouldn't overlap with EPEL.
- If there are reasons to customize/patch some of these things for the
CentOS infrastructure, perhaps they belong in a new/separate repo -- especially considering centos-extras is enabled by default.
Good points. Would a separate cbs-tools repo, with a cbs-tools-release package in CentOS-Extras be acceptable?
Sounds like a good approach to me.
-Jeff