Wondering if people would be ok with including rkt in virt7 SIG repos. some folks gave this a yay on IRC, but reaching out to the mailing list as well for more votes.
rkt is _not_ in fedora yet and including it would also imply including systemd >= 220 in virt7 as it isn't present in base CentOS.
All the gory detail around rkt packaging for fedora can be found here: https://github.com/coreos/rkt/issues/686 . The main pending issue that fedora won't agree to right now is RE: installing the stage1 rootfs tarball at rpm install time.
WIP rpm files are here: https://github.com/fedora-cloud/rkt-rpm/ . I've been adding these to my copr repo here: https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/lsm5/rkt/ . markllama and lalatenduM might have something to add to this.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lokesh Mandvekar" lsm5@fedoraproject.org To: centos-devel@centos.org Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2015 2:17:04 PM Subject: [CentOS-devel] Including rkt in virt7 - yay/nay?
Wondering if people would be ok with including rkt in virt7 SIG repos. some folks gave this a yay on IRC, but reaching out to the mailing list as well for more votes.
+1
rkt is _not_ in fedora yet and including it would also imply including systemd >= 220 in virt7 as it isn't present in base CentOS.
All the gory detail around rkt packaging for fedora can be found here: https://github.com/coreos/rkt/issues/686 . The main pending issue that fedora won't agree to right now is RE: installing the stage1 rootfs tarball at rpm install time.
WIP rpm files are here: https://github.com/fedora-cloud/rkt-rpm/ . I've been adding these to my copr repo here: https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/lsm5/rkt/ . markllama and lalatenduM might have something to add to this. -- Lokesh Freenode, OFTC: lsm5 GPG: 0xC7C3A0DD
CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
On Jul 6, 2015 7:34 PM, "Jason Brooks" jbrooks@redhat.com wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lokesh Mandvekar" lsm5@fedoraproject.org To: centos-devel@centos.org Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2015 2:17:04 PM Subject: [CentOS-devel] Including rkt in virt7 - yay/nay?
Wondering if people would be ok with including rkt in virt7 SIG repos. some folks gave this a yay on IRC, but reaching out to the mailing list
as
well for more votes.
+1
+1 here too
rkt is _not_ in fedora yet and including it would also imply including systemd >= 220 in virt7 as it isn't present in base CentOS.
All the gory detail around rkt packaging for fedora can be found here: https://github.com/coreos/rkt/issues/686 . The main pending issue that fedora won't agree to right now is RE: installing the stage1 rootfs tarball at rpm install time.
WIP rpm files are here: https://github.com/fedora-cloud/rkt-rpm/ . I've
been
adding these to my copr repo here: https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/lsm5/rkt/ . markllama and
lalatenduM
might have something to add to this.
Lokesh Freenode, OFTC: lsm5 GPG: 0xC7C3A0DD
CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
On 07/02/2015 04:17 PM, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote:
Wondering if people would be ok with including rkt in virt7 SIG repos. some folks gave this a yay on IRC, but reaching out to the mailing list as well for more votes.
rkt is _not_ in fedora yet and including it would also imply including systemd >= 220 in virt7 as it isn't present in base CentOS.
My only concerns about this would be unintended breakage due to feature changes. There's quite a bit in systemd that gets disabled or otherwise turned off. I'm okay with including it, but there should be testing with it as well.
All the gory detail around rkt packaging for fedora can be found here: https://github.com/coreos/rkt/issues/686 . The main pending issue that fedora won't agree to right now is RE: installing the stage1 rootfs tarball at rpm install time.
Ugh, that's not overly nice. So long as this is being resolved/fixed upstream, I'm okay with it.
WIP rpm files are here: https://github.com/fedora-cloud/rkt-rpm/ . I've been adding these to my copr repo here: https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/lsm5/rkt/ . markllama and lalatenduM might have something to add to this.
On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 03:15:02PM -0500, Jim Perrin wrote:
On 07/02/2015 04:17 PM, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote:
Wondering if people would be ok with including rkt in virt7 SIG repos. some folks gave this a yay on IRC, but reaching out to the mailing list as well for more votes.
rkt is _not_ in fedora yet and including it would also imply including systemd >= 220 in virt7 as it isn't present in base CentOS.
My only concerns about this would be unintended breakage due to feature changes. There's quite a bit in systemd that gets disabled or otherwise turned off. I'm okay with including it, but there should be testing with it as well.
Sure thing. systemd and rkt probably should go into a new koji tag virt7-rkt-{master,common}-* so they won't mess with the existing tags.
And we can get this tested before announcing anything :)
All the gory detail around rkt packaging for fedora can be found here: https://github.com/coreos/rkt/issues/686 . The main pending issue that fedora won't agree to right now is RE: installing the stage1 rootfs tarball at rpm install time.
Ugh, that's not overly nice. So long as this is being resolved/fixed upstream, I'm okay with it.
There was some talk of separating stage1 into its own project earlier. Can't say if this will happen for sure though.
WIP rpm files are here: https://github.com/fedora-cloud/rkt-rpm/ . I've been adding these to my copr repo here: https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/lsm5/rkt/ . markllama and lalatenduM might have something to add to this.
Guess we (me + whoever's interested) should get started with scratch builds for this like KB suggested earlier.
Thanks all for the feedback so far.
On 07/02/2015 10:17 PM, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote:
Wondering if people would be ok with including rkt in virt7 SIG repos. some folks gave this a yay on IRC, but reaching out to the mailing list as well for more votes.
I'm +1 for having it, either in the virt or Atomic SIG repos. My interest is primarily in being able to include it in the 4-week CentOS Atomic builds for folks who want to use rkt. Not sure how rkt does/doesn't line up with the goals of the virt SIG.
Best,
jzb
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 01:26:58PM +0100, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
On 07/02/2015 10:17 PM, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote:
Wondering if people would be ok with including rkt in virt7 SIG repos. some folks gave this a yay on IRC, but reaching out to the mailing list as well for more votes.
I'm +1 for having it, either in the virt or Atomic SIG repos. My interest is primarily in being able to include it in the 4-week CentOS Atomic builds for folks who want to use rkt. Not sure how rkt does/doesn't line up with the goals of the virt SIG.
I'm totally fine with rkt being in Atomic or any other SIG that we feel appropriate. Just that Docker is currently in Virt SIG and we kinda sorta decided to keep it there, while afaik the Atomic SIG consumes docker from Virt and a few other SIGs and is mainly concerned with creating Atomic images.
Best,
jzb
Joe Brockmeier | Community Team, OSAS jzb@redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/
On 07/03/2015 02:47 AM, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote:
Wondering if people would be ok with including rkt in virt7 SIG repos. some folks gave this a yay on IRC, but reaching out to the mailing list as well for more votes.
rkt is _not_ in fedora yet and including it would also imply including systemd >= 220 in virt7 as it isn't present in base CentOS.
All the gory detail around rkt packaging for fedora can be found here: https://github.com/coreos/rkt/issues/686 . The main pending issue that fedora won't agree to right now is RE: installing the stage1 rootfs tarball at rpm install time.
WIP rpm files are here:https://github.com/fedora-cloud/rkt-rpm/ . I've been adding these to my copr repo here: https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/lsm5/rkt/ . markllama and lalatenduM might have something to add to this.
+1 from me (which was understood I guess). I would be happy to help with maintaining the package in virt7.
-Lala
CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 07:12:40PM +0530, Lalatendu Mohanty wrote:
+1 from me (which was understood I guess). I would be happy to help with maintaining the package in virt7.
Of course!
All, let us know what's a good SIG to put rkt in. Or, if we need a new _Container_ SIG or whatever to put rkt, Docker and any other related tools.
-Lala
On 07/07/2015 07:33 PM, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote:
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 07:12:40PM +0530, Lalatendu Mohanty wrote:
+1 from me (which was understood I guess). I would be happy to help with maintaining the package in virt7.
Of course!
All, let us know what's a good SIG to put rkt in. Or, if we need a new _Container_ SIG or whatever to put rkt, Docker and any other related tools.
+1. Yeah I actually meant for any SIG which is appropriate :).
-Lala
-
Danilo Falcão -
Jason Brooks -
Jim Perrin -
Joe Brockmeier -
Lalatendu Mohanty -
Lokesh Mandvekar