Perhaps we can get folks who have shown interest in having Power on CentOS to post their preferred architecture here?
My vote is LE architecture. Currently , I am using CentOS on IA. My application porting is easy because LE is same as IA's endian.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 15/09/15 06:52, Takashi Ohsawa wrote:
Perhaps we can get folks who have shown interest in having Power on CentOS to post their preferred architecture here?
My vote is LE architecture. Currently , I am using CentOS on IA. My application porting is easy because LE is same as IA's endian.
-- -- Takashi Ohsawa --
Well, both ppc64 and ppc64le will be built/worked on in parallel, and there is now enough "horse power" to make that happen :-) Bootstrapping the initial buildroot for both is the most difficult part, and where people will have to spend time for "manual" mock build. After that, a simple queuing system can distribute the build jobs on multiple mock builders (like plague, koji or reimzul - centos buildsystem - )
- -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab
This sounds good ....with all participating actively seems the way to go.
Best Regards,
*Sandeep L Khuperkar | Director*
Mobile : +91-9987536436
Skype id : khuperkar
*ASHNIK TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD.*
#141, Powai Plaza, Hiranandani Gardens, Powai, Mumbai - 400076
India | www.ashnik.com
*[image: icons]*
[image: Email patch] http://www.ashnik.com/
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Fabian Arrotin arrfab@centos.org wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 15/09/15 06:52, Takashi Ohsawa wrote:
Perhaps we can get folks who have shown interest in having Power on CentOS to post their preferred architecture here?
My vote is LE architecture. Currently , I am using CentOS on IA. My application porting is easy because LE is same as IA's endian.
-- -- Takashi Ohsawa --
Well, both ppc64 and ppc64le will be built/worked on in parallel, and there is now enough "horse power" to make that happen :-) Bootstrapping the initial buildroot for both is the most difficult part, and where people will have to spend time for "manual" mock build. After that, a simple queuing system can distribute the build jobs on multiple mock builders (like plague, koji or reimzul - centos buildsystem - )
Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAlX3qzAACgkQnVkHo1a+xU6mSACfal7z1LaD+metabt/S8tpdnmU /gsAn2eO/X9JeiwK6/Va+EIMTzYJbAMq =5HY2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
ppc64 LE
+1
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015, 12:52 PM Takashi Ohsawa bodtz.bigdad@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps we can get folks who have shown interest in having Power on CentOS to post their preferred architecture here?
My vote is LE architecture. Currently , I am using CentOS on IA. My application porting is easy because LE is same as IA's endian.
-- -- Takashi Ohsawa -- _______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
-
Fabian Arrotin -
Sameer Kumar -
Sandeep Khuperkar -
Takashi Ohsawa