On 08/15/2010 03:41 PM, Alan Bartlett wrote:
Didi, our Editor in Chief, has asked me (in private) about the future of the Newsletter. My response was to suggest that it should be discussed here, with those who do their best, for each issue, with the paucity of submitted content.
Comments / views / opinions are hereby solicited.
Is it a case of better defining the content that could / would go into the newsletter, and then making contribution to the newsletter easier for people ?
I guess what I'm trying to say is, why is there little contribution:
- because we have not defined the framework well enough - because its hard for people to find out how to contribute - Could it be that the content in the existing newsletter isnt what most people are looking for ?
- KB