The teams are free to organise them self in the way they see most fit, cultural differences make it impossible to have a unified structure.
That depends on what you mean with "in the way they see most fit". I think there must be a set of rules conducting "wanted practice" when presenting at a fair/show/whatever. Same goes for content on websites.
Every team should have an "official" contact for communication between teams, the public, press and the global CentOS team.
Hmmmhmmmhmmmm again. That "press" thing doesn't go down to well with me. If someone on a regional team is going to do press, he has to be really well known to the core team.
But yeah, I like the idea in general, if someone wants to push that. Can you bring those three paragraphs up there into something which can go through as a proposal?
I like the idea, but I don't see the people doing that at the moment - if they are there I am more than glad to be proven wrong.
I would think a structure as following can be used to solve some problems attributed here :
One worldwide promo leader with a backup person | each CentOS region with a regional leader (again with a backup leader) => both regional leaders need to know the worldwide promo leader and backup and have some "close" contact | promo team members
regions are based on language and country/county (based on the size of the country) as suggested already