devel

devel@lists.centos.org

17 participants
4590 discussions

Call for presentations: CentOS Dojo at FOSDEM, Jan 31, 2020
by Rich Bowen 16 Oct '19

16 Oct '19

We'll be holding our annual CentOS Dojo in Brussels on the Friday before FOSDEM - January 31, 2020. We're looking for content relating to any aspect of CentOS, from either the user or developer perspective. The audience tends to be looking for fairly deep technical content, but also of interest is introductory content about new technology or software. Sessions will be 45 minutes. Look at https://wiki.centos.org/Events/Dojo/Brussels2019 for inspiration as to the kind of content that has been selected in past years. The CFP will close on November 18th, midnight Pacific US time. More details about this event are available at https://wiki.centos.org/Events/Dojo/Brussels2020 Submit your presentation proposal at https://forms.gle/96d6sYZtxJxBywA99 -- Rich Bowen - rbowen(a)redhat.com @CentOSProject // @rbowen 859 351 9166

1 0

mock config file for i686
by Priya, Nupur 16 Oct '19

16 Oct '19

Hi All, I need to build i686 packages for CentOS 8 through mock. Is there a repo setup for i686 build dependencies to be used by mock, and where could I find config file for i686 for mock build. Regards, Nupur

2 1

CentOS Stream enabled in Copr
by Miroslav Suchý 15 Oct '19

15 Oct '19

Hi. FYI - I just added centos-stream-x86_64 centos-stream-aarch64 centos-stream-ppc64le to https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/ You can build your packages for these chroots now. -- Miroslav Suchy, RHCA Red Hat, Associate Manager ABRT/Copr, #brno, #fedora-buildsys

1 0

Mock config for CentOS Stream
by Miroslav Suchý 14 Oct '19

14 Oct '19

Mock already ships config for CentOS Stream https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/blob/devel/mock-core-config… Thou, it does not contains Epel as oposed to epel-8-* configs: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/blob/devel/mock-core-config… I am not sure what should be relation between Epel and Stream. It is intended to work together? Or not? I will appreciate any comments to those Mock's configs. -- Miroslav Suchy, RHCA Red Hat, Associate Manager ABRT/Copr, #brno, #fedora-buildsys

1 0

CPE Weekly: 2019-10-11
by Aoife Moloney 11 Oct '19

11 Oct '19

Hi everyone, Welcome to the CPE team weekly project update mail! Background: The Community Platform Engineering group is the Red Hat team combining IT and release engineering from Fedora and CentOS. Our goal is to keep core servers and services running and maintained, build releases, and other strategic tasks that need more dedicated time than volunteers can give. For better communication, we will be giving weekly reports to the CentOS and Fedora communities about the general tasks and work being done. CentOS: - The team is working with CERN about koji upgrade process for cbs.centos.org - CentOS CI - JMS messaging plugin now in testing - Ack of messages is still missing but the fix is in progress - Both publishing & consuming are working - Mirrorlist code change for CentOS 8 - Investigating a phpbb upgrade for www.centos.org/forums and fr.centos.org/forums hosts Fedora: Rawhide Gating: <https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/projects/3> - 5.0 pre-release is ue in staging by hopefully the end of this week - New Koji has been deployed in production - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8244 - Requests for side-tags via fedpkg seems to work - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8280 - Createrepo for side tag in koji is now 45-seconds for a side-tag - this is lower than before, so making progress! - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8245 - Fedora Messaging: - Ci-resultsdb-listener is waiting on ci.centos.org to be finished/deployed. - Fedora-messaging code has been merged - New release will support new message from the CI system repoSpanner <https://github.com/repoSpanner/repoSpanner> - Increased push performance by 51%! Application Handover to Community - Elections: Blocked by this issue - PostgreSQL database is missing in application catalogue https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8253 - Badges: Thread has been started to get a decision with new maintainers - Packagedb-cli: Retired. - Pastebin: Ongoing conversations with future maintainer, expecting an update in the next week - Elections: Move to CommuniShift underway but blocked by this issue before complete - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8253 - Fedocal: Possible maintainer found & the team are/will engage to finalize - https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8274 - Deadline for commitment to maintain is still 15th October - Nuancier: Maintainer(s!) are identified and the team are engaging in a conversation :) - There is also a conversation happening <https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedorapr…> in Fedora infra channel about changes in Nuancier. - Documentation for onboarding contributors to Community OpenShift still ongoing with a good mail thread on Fedora Devel Misc highlights from various parts of the ecosystem: - FPDC: No Update - CI Initiative: Disg-git test of CentOS infra conversation happening here https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8279 <https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8279> - Bug in Koji plugin was resolved so sending signing messages has resumed. https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8158 - cpe/infra-docs repo is being removed from pagure and we are now going to use infra-docs-pagure instead. Working with an active contributor in the repo to make sure there are no problems. - Final freeze started on Tuesday 8th October As always, comments and feedback are more than welcome and we hope you are finding these updates informative! Have a great weekend! Aoife -- Aoife Moloney Feature Driver Community Platform Engineering Team Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com> Communications House Cork Road Waterford <https://www.redhat.com> -- Aoife Moloney Feature Driver Community Platform Engineering Team Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com> Communications House Cork Road Waterford <https://www.redhat.com>

1 0

Enable RDO for LinuxONE
by Shi Lin Huang 11 Oct '19

11 Oct '19

2 1

[Storage SIG] CfP: Software Defined Storage devroom at FOSDEM 2020
by Niels de Vos 11 Oct '19

11 Oct '19

Users+contributors of the CentOS Storage SIG are strongly encouraged to submit a talk for the Software Defined Storage devroom at FOSDEM '20 on the 2nd of February. The complete Call-for-Participation follows below. Thanks! Niels ### CfP for the SDS devroom ### FOSDEM is a free software event that offers open source communities a place to meet, share ideas and collaborate. It is renown for being highly developer- oriented and brings together 8000+ participants from all over the world. It is held in the city of Brussels (Belgium). FOSDEM 2020 will take place during the weekend of February 1st-2nd 2020. More details about the event can be found at http://fosdem.org/ ** Call For Participation The Software Defined Storage devroom will go into it's fourth round for talks around Open Source Software Defined Storage projects, management tools and real world deployments. Presentation topics could include but are not limited too: - Your work on a SDS project like Ceph, Gluster, OpenEBS or LizardFS - Your work on or with SDS related projects like SWIFT or Container Storage Interface - Management tools for SDS deployments - Monitoring tools for SDS clusters ** Important dates: - Nov 24th 2019: submission deadline for talk proposals - Dec 15th 2019: announcement of the final schedule - Feb 2nd 2020: Software Defined Storage dev room Talk proposals will be reviewed by a steering committee: - Niels de Vos (OpenShift Container Storage Developer - Red Hat) - Jan Fajerski (Ceph Developer - SUSE) - Kai Wagner (SUSE) - Mike Perez (Ceph Community Manager, Red Hat) Use the FOSDEM 'pentabarf' tool to submit your proposal: https://penta.fosdem.org/submission/FOSDEM20 - If necessary, create a Pentabarf account and activate it. Please reuse your account from previous years if you have already created it. https://penta.fosdem.org/user/new_account/FOSDEM20 - In the "Person" section, provide First name, Last name (in the "General" tab), Email (in the "Contact" tab) and Bio ("Abstract" field in the "Description" tab). - Submit a proposal by clicking on "Create event". - Important! Select the "Software Defined Storage devroom" track (on the "General" tab). - Provide the title of your talk ("Event title" in the "General" tab). - Provide a description of the subject of the talk and the intended audience (in the "Abstract" field of the "Description" tab) - Provide a rough outline of the talk or goals of the session (a short list of bullet points covering topics that will be discussed) in the "Full description" field in the "Description" tab - Provide an expected length of your talk in the "Duration" field. Please consider at least 5 minutes of discussion into your proposal plus allow 5 minutes for the handover to the next presenter. Suggested talk length would be 20+5+5 and 45+10+5 minutes. Note that short talks have a preference so that more topics can be presented during the day. ** Recording of talks The FOSDEM organizers plan to have live streaming and recording fully working, both for remote/later viewing of talks, and so that people can watch streams in the hallways when rooms are full. This requires speakers to consent to being recorded and streamed. If you plan to be a speaker, please understand that by doing so you implicitly give consent for your talk to be recorded and streamed. The recordings will be published under the same license as all FOSDEM content (CC-BY). Hope to hear from you soon! And please forward this announcement. If you have any further questions, please write to the mailinglist at storage-devroom(a)lists.fosdem.org and we will try to answer as soon as possible. Thanks!

1 0

CR repo in CentOS 8
by Lance Albertson 10 Oct '19

10 Oct '19

I see that CentOS-CR.repo is included with the centos-release package, however there is no CR repo to be found at the location it has at the base url: [cr] name=CentOS-$releasever - cr baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/$contentdir/$releasever/cr/$basearch/os/ gpgcheck=1 enabled=1 gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-centosofficial $ dnf repolist CentOS-8 - AppStream 173 kB/s | 5.6 MB 00:33 CentOS-8 - Base 976 kB/s | 5.3 MB 00:05 CentOS-8 - cr 222 B/s | 239 B 00:01 Error: Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'cr' My assumption was that the AppStream repo was going to replace the CR repo, is that correct? I'm wondering if that repo file was added accidentally? Thanks- -- Lance Albertson Director Oregon State University | Open Source Lab

5 6

CentOS 8 Kernel Updates
by Ladar Levison 09 Oct '19

09 Oct '19

Can someone explain what's going on with the kernel? The kernel-4.18.0-80.7.1 package is the latest available via the repos, despite kernel-4.18.0-80.11.2 having been compiled 16 days ago. (https://koji.mbox.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=4562) The koji downloads appear to still be blocked. The kernel-4.18.0-144 kernel used to be available via the Stream-BaseOS repo, but it no longer appears to be showing up. The package is still available for download, but it doesn't appear via dnf (although it has previously). I suspect the package was removed from the repo metadata, but the rpm file remains. (http://mirror.centos.org/centos/8-stream/BaseOS/x86_64/os/Packages/kernel-4…) To make things even more confusing, the kernel-4.18.0-80.7.2 package was compiled a few days ago. And like the newer kernel-4.18.0-80.11.2, appears to have never been pushed to the repos. (https://koji.mbox.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=4618) So my question is why is kernel-4.18.0-80.11.2 available? Why was the older kernel-4.18.0-80.7.2 built, and then never released? Is there an issue with these packages in need of fixing, or it simply a bug in the release/repo process? The following issues were addressed by these newer kernel packages: RHSA-2019:2411 / CVE-2019-1125 & CVE-2019-13272 RHSA-2019:2703 / CVE-2019-3846 & CVE-2019-3887 & CVE-2019-9500 & CVE-2019-9503 & CVE-2019-11487 & CVE-2019-12817 & CVE-2018-19824 RHSA-2019:2827 / CVE-2019-14835 I haven't looked into the details, but at first glance the issues seem rather important. L~

2 1

Pacemaker and pcs missing in CentOS 8
by Fedor Piecka 08 Oct '19

08 Oct '19

Hello I've been evaluating CentOS 8 for a while now. I found that pacemaker and pcs packages (aka "High Availability Addon") are missing in the default repositories. They seem to exist in EPEL. Is this a bug or an intention? There's a thread on the forum regarding this - https://www.centos.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=54&t=71842&p=302047&hilit=pac… Regards

6 10

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel