devel

devel@lists.centos.org

16 participants
4590 discussions

2023-08-09 - CentOS Public Board Meeting
by Thomas Oulevey 04 Aug '23

04 Aug '23

Hi Everyone, Our next board meeting will take place at 20:00 UTC on Wednesday: `date -d "2023-08-09 20:00 UTC"` If you would like to attend please send me an email to alphacc(a)centosproject.org ( please do not reply to @centos-devel or use another email address) and you will receive a link to a Zoom meeting room with a passcode, 1 hour before the meeting takes place. The agenda can be checked at (work in progress) : https://hackmd.io/@centosboard/r14tdu5j2 As a reminder we will enforce few rules : * Wait to be recognized by the Chair before speaking * Respect the Chair when told your time to speak is over - this will allow us to remain on agenda, and complete the meetings in the allotted time * In the event that there are Board-confidential topics, these will be put at the end of the meeting, in Executive Session, and guests will be asked to leave. We hope to minimize these items, but they do sometimes happen. The most common scenarios in which this may happen are personnel issues, or information that Red Hat wishes to share with the Board, but is not yet public. * Muting of participants, or, in extreme situations, ejection from the meeting, is at the sole discretion of the Chair. * Meetings will be recorded, and published to YouTube (possibly with edits/redaction, as approved by the Directors). Thus, by joining the meeting you consent to have your presence at the meeting, and anything you say during the meeting, made public. I hope some of you can join. Sorry for the late announcement. thanks, -- Thomas 'alphacc' Oulevey CentOS Board of Directors Secretary alphacc(a)centosproject.org

1 0

[ISA SIG] Meeting notes 2023-07-21
by Florian Weimer 03 Aug '23

03 Aug '23

I forgot to post the minutes immediately after the meeting. Key points discussed were: So far, there is no round of new rebuilds with GCC 13 scheduled. The recommended way for installation remains starting out with CentOS Stream and using dnf distro-sync. See <https://sigs.centos.org/isa/consuming/centosstream9/>. Starting with RHEL 9.2 results in cross-grade issues. If the update from c9s breaks, we may have to rebuild some more packages. Thanks, Florian

1 0

[Infra] - Planned outage : cbs.centos.org
by Fabian Arrotin 03 Aug '23

03 Aug '23

Due to a hardware replacement and storage reorg, we'll have to move the existing CentOS Community Build System (aka https://cbs.centos.org) to a new node. Migration is scheduled for """"Thursday August 3rd, 6:30 am UTC time"""". You can convert to local time with $(date -d '2023-08-03 06:30 UTC') The expected "downtime" is estimated to ~45 minutes , time needed to : - stop kojid instances - move kojihub instance and restore data - reconfigure kojid builders to point to new storage location Thanks for your understanding and patience. on behalf of the Infra team, -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org gpg key: 17F3B7A1 | @arrfab[@fosstodon.org]

1 1

Re: [CentOS-devel] [t_functional sig] Tests management with TMT
by Miroslav Vadkerti 25 Jul '23

25 Jul '23

Hi Carlos, On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 12:15 PM Frantisek Lachman <flachman(a)redhat.com> wrote: > > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez <carlosrodrifernandez(a)gmail.com> > Date: Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 4:53 AM > Subject: [CentOS-devel] [t_functional sig] Tests management with TMT > To: <centos-devel(a)centos.org> > > > Hi, > > Is there any interest or already a plan to convert the test management > of the t_functional tests to TMT (https://github.com/teemtee/tmt)? > Note that the conversion might not be even needed, tmt now serves well as a wrapper over various testing frameworks, many people use it like that. > I see that packit.dev and tmt is where fedora is trying to go instead of > zuul ci, > This might be a confusion, note that these systems are on different levels: * Packit is on the level of upstream project GitHub / GitLab contributions * Zuul CI for Fedora <https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/builds?job_name=rpm-tmt-test> and Zuul CI for CentOS Stream <https://centos.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/t/centos/builds?job_name=rpm…> are on the level of dist-git contributions All these run tmt tests which can be defined basically in any git repository (remote or local). > and also I saw the email from the cloud sig about adopting > packit.dev. I was wondering how it will impact t_functional. > Can you point me to that email please? > I have been playing with it and seems like a good tool for the job. > Glad to hear that :) Best regards, /M > > Regards, > Carlos. > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel(a)centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > -- Miroslav Vadkerti :: Senior Principal QE :: Testing Farm / Linux QE IRC mvadkert #tft #tmt #osci :: Mobile +420 773 944 252 Remote Czech Republic :: Red Hat Czech s.r.o

2 1

[t_functional sig] Tests management with TMT
by Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez 25 Jul '23

25 Jul '23

Hi, Is there any interest or already a plan to convert the test management of the t_functional tests to TMT (https://github.com/teemtee/tmt)? I see that packit.dev and tmt is where fedora is trying to go instead of zuul ci, and also I saw the email from the cloud sig about adopting packit.dev. I was wondering how it will impact t_functional. I have been playing with it and seems like a good tool for the job. Regards, Carlos.

1 0

9-stream kmods: btrfs missing for 5.14.0-340
by Anthony Alba 24 Jul '23

24 Jul '23

Hi all, A new bunch of kmods has landed for the c9s kernel release 5.14.0-340 but btrfs seems to be missing. Thanks Anthony Alba

2 1

CentOS Cloud SIG meeting minutes (2023-07-13)
by Joel Capitao 17 Jul '23

17 Jul '23

====================================================== #centos-meeting: CentOS Cloud SIG meeting (2023-07-13) ====================================================== Meeting started by jcapitao[m] at 15:00:10 UTC. The full logs are available athttps://www.centos.org/minutes/2023/July/centos-meeting.2023-07-13-15.00.… . Meeting summary --------------- * roll call (jcapitao[m], 15:00:28) * OKD/SCOS (jcapitao[m], 15:05:46) * the build infra was moved from operate-first.cloud to massopen.cloud (jcapitao[m], 15:06:11) * ACTION: lorbus to send out email to centos-devel promoting the packit.dev RFE for CBS support (lorbus, 15:11:26) * LINK: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/OKD/okd/package/cri-o/ (amoralej, 15:22:48) Meeting ended at 15:30:32 UTC. Action Items ------------ * lorbus to send out email to centos-devel promoting the packit.dev RFE for CBS support Action Items, by person ----------------------- * lorbus * lorbus to send out email to centos-devel promoting the packit.dev RFE for CBS support * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * lorbus (28) * amoralej (23) * jcapitao[m] (22) * centguard (6) * karolinku12 (1) * spotz__ (1) * karolinku[m] (0) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot

1 0

Re: [CentOS-devel] Making the redhat selinux-policy repository publicly available
by Daan De Meyer 14 Jul '23

14 Jul '23

> To get just the latest repository content, steps described by Troy should work. Additionally, most of the upstream work is done in Fedora and anyway every new commit should go to Fedora first, RHEL content is mostly a subset of Fedora, there are very few differences. Yes, but the differences might be crucial so it'd be great if we could look at the repository containing the actual policy used in centos as well. Cheers, Daan On Wed, 12 Jul 2023 at 16:16, Zdenek Pytela <zpytela(a)redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 10:37 PM Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 12:50 PM Neal Gompa <ngompa13(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 9:31 AM Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com> wrote: >>> > >>> > On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 4:28 AM Daan De Meyer <daan.j.demeyer(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Hi, >>> >> >>> >> It seems that the selinux-policy rpm is built from >>> >> git@gitlab.cee.redhat.com:SELinux/selinux-policy.git which seems to be >>> >> a redhat internal repository. More specifically, if I try to checkout >>> >> the commit listed in the selinux-policy spec >>> >> (https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/rpms/selinux-policy/-/blob/c9s/seli…) >>> >> in the fedora-selinux repository cloned from github, I get an error >>> >> saying that the commit does not exist. It would be great if the >>> >> repository containing this commit was publicly available and open for >>> >> external contributors just like all the other packages in CentOS >>> >> Stream. Is it possible to make this happen? >>> > >>> > >>> > I'm not the selinux-policy maintainer, so I can't comment on where they work on the selinux-policy source code. >>> > >>> > But this is how I get the sources, if that is what you are ultimately looking for. >>> > >>> > centpkg clone selinux-policy >>> > cd selinux-policy >>> > centpkg sources >>> > or if you want to know where they really are >>> > centpkg -v sources >>> > This shows it to be coming from >>> > https://sources.stream.centos.org/sources/rpms/selinux-policy/selinux-polic… >>> > >>> > The sources information is found in the sources file >>> > https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/rpms/selinux-policy/-/blob/c9s/sour… >>> > >>> > I know this isn't exactly what you asked for, but I hope it still helps. >>> > >>> >>> I think the idea is that having the Git repository in a public >>> location would allow the CentOS Hyperscale SIG to contribute to the >>> SELinux policy in a meaningful way. >> >> >> Ah, ok. That makes sense. >> As I said, I'm not the maintainer so I don't know why it's where it is. So I'll step out of the conversation. > > > Hi, > > I am one of the selinux-policy maintainers. Currently, repository for Fedora is at github.com and RHEL sources are in an internal repo. We have already discussed moving centos stream sources to some of the public repositories, but it did not happen. Currently we are discussing it again, there are a few options how to do so. > > To get just the latest repository content, steps described by Troy should work. Additionally, most of the upstream work is done in Fedora and anyway every new commit should go to Fedora first, RHEL content is mostly a subset of Fedora, there are very few differences. > > -- > > Zdenek Pytela > Security SELinux team > _______________________________________________ > selinux mailing list -- selinux(a)lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to selinux-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/selinux@lists.fedoraproject.o… > Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

1 0

Upcoming CentOS Connect at Fedora Flock
by Amy Marrich 12 Jul '23

12 Jul '23

Hi everyone, For those who are not aware, the next CentOS Connect will be held in conjunction with Fedora Flock which is being held August 2-4[0] in Cork, IE. While the CFP is closed, there is still time to register[1] to attend and the Schedule[2] is really coming together with a wide range of topics not just during Connect but the tracks as well. Amy 0 - https://flocktofedora.org 1 - https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/flock-2023-tickets-671047008667 2 - https://flock2023.sched.com/ *Amy Marrich* She/Her/Hers Principal Technical Marketing Manager - Cloud Platforms Red Hat, Inc <https://www.redhat.com/> amy(a)redhat.com Mobile: 954-818-0514 Slack: amarrich IRC: spotz <https://www.redhat.com/>

1 0

[Storage SIG] Problems installing ceph + qemu-kvm in C9S
by Alfredo Moralejo Alonso 12 Jul '23

12 Jul '23

Hi, After the update of liburing in centos stream 9, we are having issues to install ceph and qemu-kvm together: # dnf install ceph qemu-kvm Last metadata expiration check: 0:01:00 ago on Mon Jul 10 14:02:55 2023. Error: Problem: cannot install both liburing-2.3-2.el9.x86_64 and liburing-0.7-7.el9.x86_64 - package qemu-kvm-core-17:8.0.0-6.el9.x86_64 requires liburing.so.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package qemu-kvm-core-17:8.0.0-6.el9.x86_64 requires liburing.so.2(LIBURING_2.0)(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package ceph-osd-2:17.2.3-2.el9s.x86_64 requires liburing.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package ceph-osd-2:17.2.3-2.el9s.x86_64 requires liburing.so.1(LIBURING_0.1)(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package qemu-kvm-17:8.0.0-6.el9.x86_64 requires qemu-kvm-core = 17:8.0.0-6.el9, but none of the providers can be installed - package ceph-2:17.2.3-2.el9s.x86_64 requires ceph-osd = 2:17.2.3-2.el9s, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install the best candidate for the job Any help from storage sig will be appreciated. Best regards, Alfredo

4 4

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel