devel

devel@lists.centos.org

1 participants
4619 discussions

PHP 5.2.10 success
by Johann 06 Mar '10

06 Mar '10

I saw a request for feedback, so here it is: I have installed PHP 5.2.10 from the testing repo on 2 servers. One is a backup webserver that runs 4 Drupal sites. No issues with any of them so far, and I plan on upgrading the production server this coming weekend. The other is our mail server. It was the catalyst to try the upgrade, as our CEO insisted on getting Roundcube installed and it will not install with any version <5.2. 5.2's release was in Feb. 2008 and it seems to be mature and stable. It's been in Ubuntu since Hardy. Thanks, ~J~

4 5

distributed compiling with icecc out of a mock-chroot
by Brian Schueler 06 Mar '10

06 Mar '10

Hi, CentOSers, I found out that icecc (icecream package), the distributed compiling system delivers a great advantage for me when building software. It's quite easy to set up mock 0.9.19 to use icecream by default. There must be the lines config_opts['chroot_setup_cmd'] = 'install buildsys-build icecream' ... config_opts['macros']['%_smp_mflags'] = "-jX" in the specific OS definition, where X in the _smp_mplags line is the summary of all CPU cores in your compiler network. You have to add a repository containing the icecream RPM. I'm using icecream-0.9.4. The icecream cache must be delegated to the mock chroot by adding config_opts['plugin_conf']['bind_mount_opts']['dirs'].append\ (('/var/cache/icecream', '/var/cache/icecream' )) to the site-defaults.cfg file. This is why mock 0.9.19 is required for this. Be sure that your icecream package contains /etc/profile.d/icecream.sh which is needed to wrap cc,gcc,g++,... for icecc in the mock chroot. Or you simply take my RPM. Remember, that the compile nodes must be in the same subnet, so it's a good idea that moving together your build machines using VPN bridges or whatever. Pure compile nodes may even be something else than CentOS (i.e. Debian) because the needed (target) compiler binaries are delivered over the icecc network, too - and held in a cache. What do you think about that? Cheers, Brian

2 4

5.4 x86_64 tree is missing .treeinfo
by Cole Robinson 24 Feb '10

24 Feb '10

Hi all, The CentOS 5.4 x86_64 tree seems to be missing a .treeinfo file: http://mirrors.tummy.com/mirrors/CentOS/5.4/os/x86_64/.treeinfo compared to http://mirrors.tummy.com/mirrors/CentOS/5.4/os/i386/.treeinfo This is useful info, as virt-install and virt-manager use this to detect the URL distro, which allows us to enable goodies like virtio for sufficiently new distros (5.4 included)*. - Cole * 5.4 detection isn't actually present in 5.4 virt-install, is available upstream.

2 1

tb's on p.c.o
by Jerry Amundson 23 Feb '10

23 Feb '10

I'm seeing this when trying the Projects, eg. LiveCD, XFS, etc. Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/trac/web/main.py", line 406, in dispatch_request dispatcher.dispatch(req) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/trac/web/main.py", line 206, in dispatch req.hdf = HDFWrapper(loadpaths=chrome.get_all_templates_dirs()) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/trac/web/chrome.py", line 263, in get_all_templates_dirs dirs += provider.get_templates_dirs() File "build/bdist.linux-x86_64/egg/acct_mgr/web_ui.py", line 264, in get_templates_dirs File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/pkg_resources.py", line 799, in resource_filename return get_provider(package_or_requirement).get_resource_filename( File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/pkg_resources.py", line 1229, in get_resource_filename return self._extract_resource(manager, zip_path) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/pkg_resources.py", line 1235, in _extract_resource last = self._extract_resource( File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/pkg_resources.py", line 1249, in _extract_resource real_path = manager.get_cache_path( File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/pkg_resources.py", line 880, in get_cache_path self.extraction_error() File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/pkg_resources.py", line 846, in extraction_error raise err ExtractionError: Can't extract file(s) to egg cache The following error occurred while trying to extract file(s) to the Python egg cache: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/.python-eggs' The Python egg cache directory is currently set to: /.python-eggs Perhaps your account does not have write access to this directory? You can change the cache directory by setting the PYTHON_EGG_CACHE environment variable to point to an accessible directory.

2 1

Why are Spacewalk packages removed from CentOS?
by Miroslav Suchý 17 Feb '10

17 Feb '10

Hi, severals users of Spacewalk [1] reported that Spacewalk client tools are removed [2] from CentOS (they are present in RHEL). It's about packages: rhn-check rhn-client-tools rhnlib rhnsd rhn-setup rhn-setup-gnome yum-rhn-plugin I dig up in history [3] and find that the reason was probably reference to rhn.redhat.com. Since current Spacewalk (default) configuration should not hit rhn.redhat.com I'm curious if those packages can be put back to CentOS? Or is some other reason behind removal of those packages? 1: https://fedorahosted.org/spacewalk/ 2: http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.4#head-6dfcd9ddca9da991… 3: https://www.redhat.com/archives/spacewalk-devel/2008-July/msg00042.html -- Miroslav Suchy Red Hat Satellite Engineering Cloud Computing and Integrated Solution Dept.

8 37

unit test generator for shared C/C++ library API
by Andrey Ponomarenko 16 Feb '10

16 Feb '10

Dear colleagues, Linux Verification Center at the Institute for System Programming of RAS and the Linux Foundation have released a free unit test generator for shared C/C++ library API. It helps to quickly generate simple ("sanity" or "shallow"-quality) tests for all functions from the library API using their signatures and data type definitions straight from the library header files. The quality of generated tests allows to check absence of critical errors in simple use cases and can be improved by involving of highly reusable specialized types for the library. This tool can execute generated tests and detect all kinds of emitted signals, early program exits, program hanging and specified requirement failures. It can be considered as a tool for low-cost sanity checking of library API or as a powerful test development framework. Also it supports universal Template2Code format of tests, random test generation mode and other useful features. This tool is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU GPLv2. We suppose this tool can be very useful for shared library developers and recommend it for including to Cent OS. For more information, please see: http://ispras.linux-foundation.org/index.php/API_Sanity_Autotest Andrey Ponomarenko Linux Verification Center at the Institute for System Programming of RAS

1 0

yum-3.2.22-23.el5.centos in c5-testing
by Karanbir Singh 13 Feb '10

13 Feb '10

Hi, yum-3.2.22-23.el5.centos is now available in the c5-testing repo, please check / test and post feedback. This is the yum which will most likely be released along with 5.5 so its important we provide feedback at this stage, so as many issues as possible are ironed out before release. -- Karanbir Singh kbsingh(a)karan.org | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh ICQ: 2522219 | Yahoo IM: z00dax | Gtalk: z00dax GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

4 3

Call for Firefox 3.6.1 and Thunderbird 3.0.1 testers
by David Hrbáč 11 Feb '10

11 Feb '10

Hi, I have made complete rebuild and backport of Firefox 3.6.1 and Thunderbird 3.0.1 to CentOS 5. Packages come with language packs, debuginfo packages, xulrunner etc. I'm looking for QA testers. Upgrade from distro versions works pretty fine. Thanks, David Hrbáč

4 4

Về: CentOS-devel Digest, Vol 60, Issue 3
by NGUYEN VAN TAN 10 Feb '10

10 Feb '10

Dear Fabian Arrotin I cross-compiled the packages for ppc on x86 I just modified Makefile, configuration file or spec file if necessary to support to cross compile. For example, the spec file of bash package on the attachment I'm testing on PowerBook G4. --- Ngày Thứ 4, 10/02/10, centos-devel-request(a)centos.org <centos-devel-request(a)centos.org> đã viết: Từ: centos-devel-request(a)centos.org <centos-devel-request(a)centos.org> Chủ đề: CentOS-devel Digest, Vol 60, Issue 3 Đến: centos-devel(a)centos.org Ngày: Thứ Tư, 10 tháng 2, 2010, 0:00 Send CentOS-devel mailing list submissions to centos-devel(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-devel-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-devel-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-devel digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: Why are Spacewalk packages removed from CentOS? (Karanbir Singh) 2. Re: Fasttrack for C-5 (Karanbir Singh) 3. Forum thread -- "Another win for CentOS for me" (Alan Bartlett) 4. V?: CentOS-devel Digest, Vol 60, Issue 1 (NGUYEN VAN TAN) 5. Re: V?: CentOS-devel Digest, Vol 60, Issue 1 (Fabian Arrotin) 6. Re: Why are Spacewalk packages removed from CentOS? (Marcus Moeller) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 18:11:27 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <mail-lists(a)karan.org> Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Why are Spacewalk packages removed from CentOS? To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel(a)centos.org> Message-ID: <4B7053CF.7080109(a)karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On 04/02/10 21:43, Marcus Moeller wrote: > As stated before, inclusion of the RHEL packages does not make much > sence, as they are soon out of sync. This conversation has gone past 2 full loops now. The only issue, as far as I can tell, not cleared up is that can packages in the stock EL4 and EL5 srpm tree be used against spacewalk 0.6 and 0.7 ? They might be 'outdated' in that perhaps all features may not be present, but is there an issue of these packages not being usable at all due to an api incompatibility ? -- Karanbir Singh kbsingh(a)karan.org | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh ICQ: 2522219 | Yahoo IM: z00dax | Gtalk: z00dax GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 18:14:41 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <mail-lists(a)karan.org> Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Fasttrack for C-5 To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel(a)centos.org> Message-ID: <4B705491.2090303(a)karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On 28/01/10 14:33, Ned Slider wrote: >> Does the filesystem package no longer require CentOS branding changes to >> be rolled in? >> $ rpm -q filesystem >> filesystem-2.4.0-2.el5.centos.x86_64 Will look at that. > Looks like pirut still needs it's Requires for rhn components removed too. > error: Failed dependencies: > rhn-setup-gnome is needed by pirut-1.3.28-17.el5.noarch And this as well. thanks for acting as issue catcher, its good to know that stuff I farkup is going to be caught along the line :) btw, the major point of getting these packages into a repo was to work on the code that allows us to produce a package-db api. After a lot of feature creep and de-creep there is something that should mostly work. I'll post more details on that in the next few days. Also, by this weekend there should be yum-security working capability in this ft-testing repo. I'll post an email here when thats in place. -- Karanbir Singh kbsingh(a)karan.org | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh ICQ: 2522219 | Yahoo IM: z00dax | Gtalk: z00dax GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 18:18:00 +0000 From: Alan Bartlett <ajb(a)elrepo.org> Subject: [CentOS-devel] Forum thread -- "Another win for CentOS for me" To: CentOS developers mailing list <centos-devel(a)centos.org> Message-ID: <4e2e72e81002081018n2df9a6acjb7f7c7667733116f(a)mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Just an appreciative comment [1] that I pass on. Alan. [1] http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=24711&start=0#fo… ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 18:18:15 -0800 (PST) From: NGUYEN VAN TAN <tan20bk(a)yahoo.com> Subject: [CentOS-devel] V?: CentOS-devel Digest, Vol 60, Issue 1 To: centos-devel(a)centos.org Message-ID: <955141.78284.qm(a)web62406.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Hi all I just mention to distro built from source code of CentOS 5. And now I'm trying to test the distro. Thank you, Nguy?n V?n T?n --- Ng?y Th? 4, 3/02/10, centos-devel-request(a)centos.org <centos-devel-request(a)centos.org> ?? vi?t: T?: centos-devel-request(a)centos.org <centos-devel-request(a)centos.org> Ch? ??: CentOS-devel Digest, Vol 60, Issue 1 ??n: centos-devel(a)centos.org Ng?y: Th? T?, 3 th?ng 2, 2010, 0:00 Send CentOS-devel mailing list submissions to ??? centos-devel(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit ??? http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to ??? centos-devel-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at ??? centos-devel-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-devel digest..." Today's Topics: ???1. CentOS test technique (NGUYEN VAN TAN) ???2. Re: CentOS test technique (Fabian Arrotin) ???3. Re: CentOS test technique (Timo Schoeler) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 01:11:27 -0800 (PST) From: NGUYEN VAN TAN <tan20bk(a)yahoo.com> Subject: [CentOS-devel] CentOS test technique To: centos-devel(a)centos.org Message-ID: <183807.78931.qm(a)web62403.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Hi all I have built a centos for my powerpc laptop. Are there any techique to test the distribution? Thank you. Nguy?n V?n T?n ? ? ? B?n lu?n mu?n k?t n?i v?i nhi?u b?n b? h?n tr?n blog v? trang web c? nh?n? T?o Pingbox m?i nh?t ngay h?m nay! http://vn.messenger.yahoo.com/pingbox/

1 0

Về: CentOS-devel Digest, Vol 60, Issue 1
by NGUYEN VAN TAN 09 Feb '10

09 Feb '10

Hi all I just mention to distro built from source code of CentOS 5. And now I'm trying to test the distro. Thank you, Nguyễn Văn Tân --- Ngày Thứ 4, 3/02/10, centos-devel-request(a)centos.org <centos-devel-request(a)centos.org> đã viết: Từ: centos-devel-request(a)centos.org <centos-devel-request(a)centos.org> Chủ đề: CentOS-devel Digest, Vol 60, Issue 1 Đến: centos-devel(a)centos.org Ngày: Thứ Tư, 3 tháng 2, 2010, 0:00 Send CentOS-devel mailing list submissions to centos-devel(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-devel-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-devel-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-devel digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CentOS test technique (NGUYEN VAN TAN) 2. Re: CentOS test technique (Fabian Arrotin) 3. Re: CentOS test technique (Timo Schoeler) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 01:11:27 -0800 (PST) From: NGUYEN VAN TAN <tan20bk(a)yahoo.com> Subject: [CentOS-devel] CentOS test technique To: centos-devel(a)centos.org Message-ID: <183807.78931.qm(a)web62403.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Hi all I have built a centos for my powerpc laptop. Are there any techique to test the distribution? Thank you. Nguy?n V?n T?n B?n lu?n mu?n k?t n?i v?i nhi?u b?n b? h?n tr?n blog v? trang web c? nh?n? T?o Pingbox m?i nh?t ngay h?m nay! http://vn.messenger.yahoo.com/pingbox/

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel