devel

devel@lists.centos.org

4 participants
4639 discussions

testing kernel
by Christoph Maser 11 Jan '07

11 Jan '07

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 i've installed 2.6.9-42.37.EL.c4testsmp, installtion worked fine without warnings, bootup looks normal, system is running normal Chris -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with CentOS - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFphoCsLjW0HYht7URAvNQAKDQcQ35MuoWRrZ33BAQeSijJu2kfACcCRA/ AMl6NyJh11jXopUYiFBKurw= =xznD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

New nx/freenx RPMS for CentOS-4 i386 in the Testing Repo
by Johnny Hughes 09 Jan '07

09 Jan '07

There are new versions of nx and freenx for CentOS-4 i386 in the testing repo: freenx-0.5.0-11.c4.i386.rpm nx-2.1.0-2.c4.i386.rpm I am using this on 3 servers and it seems at least as stable as the previous versions. These RPMS roll in the latest nx-2.1.x server components from nomachine.org (current CentOS-4 version has nx-1.5.x server components). The full screen patch was retained across versions and seems to work OK here as well. If you are using the CentOS version of NX / FreeNX, please test this version and provide feedback on this list. Barring any show stopping negative feedback, these RPMS will replace the current versions in CentOS extras in 2 weeks. Testing repository .repo file: http://dev.centos.org/centos/4/CentOS-Testing.repo Packages can be download manually here: http://dev.centos.org/centos/4/testing/i386/RPMS/ Thanks, Johnny Hughes

5 16

kernel-2.6.9-42.37.EL.c4test is available for i686 and x86_64 in the Testing Repo
by Johnny Hughes 09 Jan '07

09 Jan '07

All, I needed to build kernel-2.6.9-42.37.EL.c4test for this bug: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=1634 So ... that new kernel is available for others to try as well from the testing repository. It has Xen kernels too. It is not too much different than the 2.6.9-42.35 kernel released on Dec 26th by us to the testing repo (a lot of dm fixes that might help the above bug, which is why I built it). Here is a list of the changes from 2.6.9-42.35 to 2.6.9-42.37: * Wed Jan 03 2007 Jason Baron <jbaron(a)redhat.com> [2.6.9-42.37] -add qlogic iscsi driver (Mike Christie) [180363] -fix laptop shutdown behavior when closing lid (Jim Paradis) [154061] -s390: qeth driver fixes (Jan Glauber) [104646 200166 202047 212176] -add IBM Advanced Management Module 2 to the whitelist for USB storage for devices with multiple LUNs (Konrad Rzeszutek) [196809] -serial fifo fixes (Alan Cox) [168845] -update SCSI blacklist for HP and SEAGATE Tape Devices (Chip Coldwell) [197381] -fix oops in md device stop code (Doug Ledford) [199304] -fix race condition in sys_mincore() (Doug Chapman) [180663] {CVE-2006-4814} -fix console when no "console=" arguments are specified (Chris Lalancette) [220949] -fix oops bug in cdev_put() (Doug Ledford) [164649] -eClipz: CAS call crashing firmware (Janice Girouard) [220486] * Fri Dec 22 2006 Jason Baron <jbaron(a)redhat.com> [2.6.9-42.36] -s390: fix panic in do_sync_write()/do_sync_read() (Jan Glauber) [196348] -tg3: update to 3.64-rh (John Linville) [196786 198003 202063] -dm: add ioctl support for mapped devices (Milan Broz) [168801] -fix "Hardware P-state driver for AMD processors" for up kernel (Bhavana Nagendra) -dm mirror: fix deadlock in kmirrord when dirty log on mirror itself (Milan Broz) [186950] -dm: store and use md pointer in every table (Milan Broz) [199622] -dm: fix overwriting of extra slot in bi_io_vec (Milan Broz) [219615] -dm: fix suspend error path (Milan Broz) [219616] -dm multipath: rr path order is inverted (Milan Broz) [219630] -dm: add common biosets code (Milan Broz) [215939] -dm mirror: remove trailing space from table (Milan Broz) [215941] -revert: nfs: fix permission handling for truncate calls ---------------------- This is a test Kernel ... use at your own risk :-) ---------------------- Testing Repo info: http://wiki.centos.org/Repositories Thanks, Johnny Hughes

9 23

Kernel for Oracle
by TEOTONIO 09 Jan '07

09 Jan '07

When installing oracle (10g for exemple) modifications are need on kernel parameters in file /etc/sysctl.conf. Well :-) --- This modifications cannot be done directy on kernel source code? The kernel source code are prepared for oracle? I am interest on make this modifications, if this needs. Tks -- [S] TEOTONIO http://teotonio.eti.br

4 3

Migrating from RH9 Legacy to CentOS 3
by R P Herrold 09 Jan '07

09 Jan '07

On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, David Eisner wrote: > R P Herrold wrote: >> On Tue, 24 Oct 2006, David Eisner wrote: >>> With the end of Legacy support for RH9, I'd like to migrate my Fedora >>> Legacified RH9 box to Centos 3. >>> http://www.owlriver.com/tips/centos-31-ex-rhl-9/ >>> Any thoughts on whether this should also work with the .legacy packages? >> As author of the migration instructions in question, let me give an >> unqualified "Yes, probably" .... ;) > 1. The Centos-3.8 isos for CD 1 and 3 both had a > comps-3.8centos.0-0.20060803.i386.rpm package, which were > not identical. I used the CD 3 version. noted, wearing my 'CentOS' hat - thanks for the report -- U9 whould be along in reasonably soon which will get a respin, but we'll look for that in the CentOS build process > "yum -y -t -c /etc/yum-upgrade.conf upgrade rpm kernel", > [Segmentation fault happened here] hmmm --- wish I had more information here -- probably the instructions need to be updated to suggest removing all but the kernel in use; a pre-conversion 'yum -y clean all' would probably be prophylactic as well. > To solve this, I first tried upgrading python from python-2.2.2-26 to > python-2.2.3-26, using an RPM downloaded from www.python.org. This ouch -- python version dependent matters are _so_ integral to a Red Hat derived system, that I consider that pretty 'daring' > 3. Step 8. has one run the same two commands twice. The > second time I ran "rpm -vv --rebuilddb", it was not happy: > I rebooted, and then the rebuilddb worked. The second "yum > -y -t -c /etc/yum-upgrade.conf upgrade rpm kernel" ran and, > not surprisingly, told me there were no upgrades available. We are in terra incognita here with the python version possibly in play; I think my instructions whould suggest the reboot before the first and second rebuilddb's again, not for a known issue, but to make sure we are under the new kernel > 4. Step 9. worked fine, it just took awhile. However, a few > .legacy packages remained: > $ rpm -qa |grep legacy > > sendmail-cf-8.12.11-4.24.1.legacy > fetchmail-6.2.0-3.4.legacy > libpng10-1.0.15-0.9.1.legacy > gettext-0.11.4-7.2.legacy > kernel-2.4.20-46.9.legacy > tcpdump-3.7.2-7.9.4.legacy > libpcap-0.7.2-7.9.4.legacy > kernel-2.4.20-43.9.legacy > zip-2.3-26.1.0.9.legacy > sendmail-8.12.11-4.24.1.legacy I had not considered this later versioned material (when the outline was written, it was in the future, and unknowable as to how this would play out), as the path I outlined from RHL 9 would not encounter it; I will approach other members of the CentOS team in the topic of how we are to offer a path to 'care' for the people orphaned by the EOL of FL. btw, Kudos to Jesse and the folks who kept FL running for the two years or so it ran -- I know how difficult starting and running a distribution is, and a great effort and success were the result. > I removed the legacy kernel packages, and "upgraded" the > rest manually with rpm -Uvh --force. That seems to have > worked. Then I rebooted. I will consider adding a section about 'housekeeping' to identify and get back onto the CentOS main line path for the FL transitioners. seems like a good idea. Thanks for noting this. > Finally I replaced /etc/yum.conf with the sample given in > the Owl River instructions, and it appears to be working > (there were two packages available for updating (GConf and > oaf) which I was able to do with no problems). Great -- Thank You, David. -- Russ Herrold

4 6

RE: [CentOS-devel] Count of mailing list members
by Brett Simpson 08 Jan '07

08 Jan '07

Awesome! Thanks -----Original Message----- From: centos-devel-bounces(a)centos.org [mailto:centos-devel-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Johnny Hughes Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 3:01 PM To: CentOS-Devel Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Count of mailing list members On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 10:58 -0800, Brett Simpson wrote: > Does anyone have a count of how many list members > there are across all > CentOS mailing lists? > > Brett Yes :) (oh ... do you want to know :P) CentOS: 2514 CentOS-devel: 488 CentOS-Announce: 3233 CentOS-Mirror: 517 CentOS-Docs: 50 Thanks, Johnny Hughes __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

1 0

Count of mailing list members
by Brett Simpson 08 Jan '07

08 Jan '07

Does anyone have a count of how many list members there are across all CentOS mailing lists? Brett __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

2 1

Re: [CentOS-devel] [off topic] Oracle Lnux
by Durval Menezes 05 Jan '07

05 Jan '07

Hello, Ralph Angenendt wrote: > Daouda Lo wrote: > > On 1/5/07, Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> wrote: > > >Oracle REALLY, REALLY, REALLY needs to rethink this policy ... giving > > >away free ISOs that contain packages with known security vulnerabilities > > >and not providing free security updates is wrong headed and ABSOLUTELY > > >IRRESPONSIBLE. > > > > > >I can't understand how they can sleep at night. > > Looking at their security track regarding their flagship product - I > think they're used to it or their drugs are strong enough :) As the fortune program said: "I'm sorry, sir, but you obviously has mistaken them for someone who gives a sh*t" :-) Best Regards, -- Durval Menezes (durval AT tmp DOT com DOT br, http://www.tmp.com.br/)

1 0

[off topic] Oracle Lnux
by TEOTONIO 05 Jan '07

05 Jan '07

Hello all, this is my first post. :-) Enterprise Linux Oracle is Centos or is based on Centos??? Sory my bad english :( I am a author of distro Libertas based on Fedora Core 3.0, instaled in plus 9000 PCs on scholl LAN (Belo Horizonte-MG Brazil). Tks on repry. -- [S] TEOTONIO http://libertas.pbh.gov.br http://babel.codigolivre.org.br http://www.advogato.org/person/lercio

7 7

I needed SVN Subversion 1.4 or greater on my centos server
by prabhat kumar 05 Jan '07

05 Jan '07

Hi, Please help me.. I needed SVN Subversion 1.4 or greater on my centos server. I enabled CentOSPlus by editing /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo But I got Subversion 1.1.4, which have lots of bugs which is fixed in higher version of subversion 1.4 Release http://subversion.tigris.org/svn_1.4_releasenotes.html. Subversion 1.4 Release is stable version. Is there any reason why we do not have Subversion 1.4 in the CentOSPlus repo ? Is there any way to use Subversion 1.4 in the CentOSPlus repo. Thanks in Advance. Prabhat ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- If we were born knowing everything, what would we do with all time on this earth?

6 10

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel