Il giorno lun 6 lug 2020 alle ore 19:34 Dominik Holler < Dominik.Holler@gmx.net> ha scritto:
On 7/6/20 3:55 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Hi,
never been involved with the nfv sig,
Karanbir, looks like you are the only one in the adminstrator role of sig-nfv.
Adding +Fabian Arrotin arrfab@centos.org to the loop
regards
On 06/07/2020 14:23, Alfredo Moralejo Alonso wrote:
Adding kb as NFV Sig chair.
What needs to be done to get this moving on?, some maintainers (including myself) have requested access to nfv-sig group but there has been no response.
What's the status of NFV SIG?
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 2:32 PM Dominik Holler <Dominik.Holler@gmx.net mailto:Dominik.Holler@gmx.net> wrote:
> From: Alfredo Moralejo Alonso <amoralej@redhat.com <mailto:amoralej@redhat.com> > <mailto:amoralej@redhat.com <mailto:amoralej@redhat.com>>> > Date: Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 1:24 PM > Subject: [CentOS-devel] Rebuilding OpenvSwitch and OVN from Fast > DataPath in NFV Sig > To: The CentOS developers mailing list. <centos-devel@centos.org <mailto:centos-devel@centos.org> > <mailto:centos-devel@centos.org <mailto:centos-devel@centos.org> > > Hi, > > During the last years OpenVswitch and OVN have become a major > dependency for several projects and SIGs in the CentOS ecosystem, > including OpenStack, oVirt and OpenShift. During this time each > project has been following its own way with limited coordination > (just some opportunistic cross-tagging between SIGs) and different > approaches, rebuilding Fedora builds or FDP srpms from ftp.redhat.com <http://ftp.redhat.com> > <http://ftp.redhat.com> > from time to time in their own tags and repos. > > This has led to multiple issues and suboptimal usage resources soI
> think a good step ahead would be to use existing NFV SIG [1] as a > collaboration area for all the interested projects to build, testand
> ship OpenvSwitch and OVN using public SRPMs from Fast Datapath[2].
> > What I'm proposing is that the interested people in becoming > maintainers for OVS/OVN in NFV Sig request membership to nfv-siggroup
> [3]. Then, we'll coordinate to request new tags/buildroots forOVS/OVN
> and start building and testing the required releases. > > Any thoughts on this proposal? > I think this would be efficient. I already applied to become a member of sig-nfv to help. > Best regards, > > Alfredo > > > [1] https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/NFV > [2] >ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/8Base/en/Fast-Datapath/SRPMS/
> [3] https://accounts.centos.org/group/members/sig-nfv > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel@centos.org <mailto:CentOS-devel@centos.org> <mailto:CentOS-devel@centos.org <mailto:CentOS-devel@centos.org>> > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > > > -- > Didi >
CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel