devel

devel@lists.centos.org

1 participants
4619 discussions

glibc x86_64 vs. i686 file conflict when building from sources
by Leonard den Ottolander 29 Nov '10

29 Nov '10

Hi, (Posting on this list instead of a RHEL list as even though strictly speaking this is a RHEL issue I expect CentOS developers to be familiar with the problem I'm running into.) I am trying to build the RHEL 6 sources on top of RHEL 6 beta on an AMD x86_64. I thought I start by updating glibc to the current version before continuing with building gcc. The build of gcc requires both x86_64 and i686 versions of glibc to be available. So I built the x86_64 version with a plain rpmbuild. For the i686 I used mock. Now when I try to update both glibc's I get conflicts between the configuration and documentation files of both rpms. That issue does not exist with the original rpms, I can install both versions without running into conflicts. Is there a way around this conflict without forcing the upgrade? How come the original rpms don't have this conflict? Is it just a matter of the dates on those files being different, and if so, how would I build the rpms for both archs in one run so the dates do not conflict? Any thoughts, pointers and elaboration on the subject is welcome. Regards, Leonard. -- mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research

11 32

branding / content changes search
by Karanbir Singh 26 Nov '10

26 Nov '10

hi guys, Can we target Monday the 29th to finish the audits for branding and content changes ? thanks, - KB

1 0

Trademarked content hunt
by R P Herrold 24 Nov '10

24 Nov '10

I see a bug filing, done merely by looking for certain words, perhaps with find and grep on an exploded tree. This is probably not helpful The issue is NOT if a word form or file name containing the word fragments 'hat' and 'red' is present. Rather it is if a formal TRADEMARK (as opposed to mere identification) of ANY other party, or non-free (i.e., copyrighted and not under a GPL [former approach] or CC [present approach] or other freely redistributable license) images are present The mere 'use' of the word fragments when used as identifiers is not a problem -- if that file is under the GPL, etc, it is free for reuse without change; if it IS changed, or a derivative work produced from teh sources that generate that file, we need to be sensitive to maintaining the COPYING and copyright trail, so a 'light touch' and thoughtful changes, rather than simply running a 'sed' bulldozer through a srouce tree is in order Turning to the upstream sources, Red Hat initially isolated this type of content to two packages: redhat-artwork and the install time 'images' file for anaconda In recent upstream product, I also see; redhat-logos Over time, Fedora has acted to track down and get licenses cleaned up and reviewed, and we benefit from that effort We at CentOS may WANT to alter a given piece of branding art, but please do not conflate what we must do with what is merely a potential 'want' -- Russ herrold

4 3

Artwork packages for CentOS 6
by Marcus Moeller 20 Nov '10

20 Nov '10

Hi all, as there are many changes in Anaconda (and not only there) I don't think our old artwork build infrastructure is capable of creating the necessary files. If I should take a look at what needs to be drawn, please point me to the packages/files that needs to be modified. -- Greets Marcus

2 4

package of cemtos 6
by ops Power Fag 19 Nov '10

19 Nov '10

krankbir, found not package needs bramding helps. find where you will tell me?

1 0

CentOS 6 Mirror System Layout
by JohnS 19 Nov '10

19 Nov '10

Would yall say (devs), this would be the default mirror URL layout for CentOS 6? Of course the baseurl also and as goes also for i386? [Base] name=os mirrorlist=http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=6&arch=x86_64&repo=os #baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/os/x86_64/ John

2 4

RHEL 6 Released
by Rodrigo Barbosa 18 Nov '10

18 Nov '10

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 For those who have been living under a rock (and don't read slashdot), RedHat released RHEL 6 yesterday. So guys, what can I do to help getting CentOS 6 going ? - -- Rodrigo Barbosa "everything looks perfect from far away" - The Postal Service "Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill & Ted (Wyld Stallyns) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFM3BFdpdyWzQ5b5ckRArmXAKCyCIMbEk/UrZmk2eUjbo3Y6cX5lACgpN+z Sj6Ozw2ko48SUxEByagSUdQ= =n87j -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

4 3

KDE 3.5
by felek＠bpmok.waw.pl 18 Nov '10

18 Nov '10

Hi, Will be any chance, to get KDE 3.5 on CentOS 6? I ask, because i dont like new-look KDE 4, and not realy love Gnome. -- Regards, Mike

2 2

helping with CentOS-6 - step-1
by Karanbir Singh 17 Nov '10

17 Nov '10

Hi, So while we wait for the first set of packages to build the biggest effort required is to find, confirm and patch those packages that have upstream branding in them. And packages that need to be changed to work within the centos ecosystem. The aim is to find any mention of the upstream brands / trademarks and content that might cause confusion as to what product the user is running ( eg: %descriptions in spec files ). And when we find something of this nature, file a report against the right centos-6/component on http://bugs.centos.org/. I've imported all the components of CentOS-6 into the bugs.c.o interface, if there is anything missing please shout out. We might need to add some down the road ( eg: centos-release-notes ), and remove some ( eg: RedHat-Release-Notes-* ), but most of the components should be there now. There is, an extremely brief, overview of the whole process at : http://wiki.centos.org/QaWiki/6/Round1 Also, please leave issues assigned to the default 'Issue Tracker' role account. The QA team members will assign the issues to themselves when they do the reviews. Keep in mind that if you need an installed system to do these tests ( like one would for the gnome/kde components ), you can use the rhel6-beta2-refresh media. The package manifests have not changed much from there to what's in release. so even if you were to go through the beta2-refresh packages, that would help. Thanks in advance to everyone who pitches in. - KB

4 9

CentOS Font
by Marcus Moeller 16 Nov '10

16 Nov '10

Hi all. I know it's quite late for changes and I am sorry for not coming up with the following issue earlier. The CentOS logo makes use of a commercial font called Denmark. It would be great if we could replace it with a free font. My suggestion is Vegur from arro. I have created a logo using this found which could be found here: http://www.marcus-moeller.de/share/new_logo_plain.png note: it's white on transparent bg which might be displayed as white on white in your browser so use your preferred image viewer instead. Please let me know your comments. -- Greets Marcus

4 11

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel