devel

devel@lists.centos.org

1 participants
4619 discussions

Re: [CentOS-devel] [packagers] Re: wine 1.2 packages
by Dag Wieers 12 Aug '10

12 Aug '10

On Thu, 12 Aug 2010, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote: > On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 11:52 +0200, Dag Wieers wrote: > >> (flex and make come to mind, there were a few others) > > Yes!!! > > Latest autotools, flex / bison, static packages for unsatisfiable > dependencies such as curl, qt etc. All of this has no place in the > standard base repository. > >> It could be: >> >> >> What do people think ? > > From the aestetical point of view what bothers be is that rf is just 2 > characters, while the rest is 3 characters long :-) But on the upside, you shouldn't see those on "normal" systems :-) Which reminds me that I also did the proposal of creating an "extras" repository, so: .rf. rpmforge stable (additional packages) .rfb. rpmforge buildtools (buildtools, not required) .rft. rpmforge testing (test stuff, no guarantee) .rfx. rpmforge extras (packages replacing base) Not sure if rfx/extras is a good name for that repository. If we decide to do this, I guess we should start identifying those packages that replace base, or require packages that replace base. -- -- dag wieers, dag(a)wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]

3 2

wine 1.2 packages
by Janez Kosmrlj 12 Aug '10

12 Aug '10

Hi there, I made wine 1.2 packages for centos. I would like to share them but i don't have a public repository. Is there a place, where i could upload this packages. Maybe someone else would need them too. The packages are built to my needs, so they don't have winetricks or desktop integration, but they work. Regards Janez

3 4

centos site down?
by Akemi Yagi 09 Aug '10

09 Aug '10

I cannot connect to www.centos.org and related sites. It was noticed that access to the forums has been very slow today. Now the site is totally inaccessible. Akemi

3 7

rpms development
by Nickos H 09 Aug '10

09 Aug '10

Why centos does not have something similar like this: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/

5 9

Re: [CentOS-devel] [CentOS] WAS/CentOS 5.5 latest revisions seem really slow//Now Where are the Kernels?
by JohnS 04 Aug '10

04 Aug '10

On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 00:41 -0700, Mark wrote: > On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 9:30 PM, JohnS <jses27(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > You can do: > > rpm -q --changelog kernel >> changelog.log \ > > rpm -q --changelog kernel-2.6.18-194.8.1.el5 >> changelog.log > > > > To view the changelog for patches and BZs Applied to the kernel or any > > rpm. As in load up the newest one and run the command. I see a lot of > > changes between the newest one and the one (194.3.1) that you tried and > > said solved it. I would creep on up in versions to the newest one you > > can run with out the problem then file a bug report with a good > > description of the problem and type of hardware also (i think important > > for your problem). > > > > Egad - on the CentOS mirror I checked (USC), there are no kernels > between 194.3.1 and 194.8.1. Sun May 02 2010 Jiri Pirko <jpirko(a)redhat.com> [2.6.18-194.3.1.el5] Well that one you have. Why do you have it? Because I guess an @CentOS.org Hat decided to build that one while all the other ones were plain out skipped in-between? My ohh my the Heart and Soul was forgotten. All of 4 - FOUR of them. Effectively your stuck with the one you got that works or you have to learn to build your own from the red hat sources. > If I just build kernels from the Linux archives, would those just work > as-is under CentOS? I haven't actually done that in a while, but if > it's moderately safe using the "standard" spec files.... Maybe so be carefull. So insightfully what I do for my precious customers on CentOS is I actually build the updates from the RH Sources to keep them happy because some do like to plunder about when are updates coming out. Maybe the cache directory eatted them up? John

1 1

Linux NFSv4 Client (CentOS-5.3) kernel panic when running LTP
by Sid Moore 02 Aug '10

02 Aug '10

Hi, My NFS Client is CentOS5.3 (2.6.18) and server is SUSE11. When running LTP (ltp-full-20080930), the client crashed. the stack is below. Kernel BUG at fs/nfs/nfs4xdr.c:872 invalid opcode: 0000 [1] SMP last sysfs file: /block/sdb/size CPU 0 Modules linked in: ipv6 xfrm_nalgo crypto_api autofs4 hidp l2cap bluetooth blockvt(PU) nfs(U) lockd(U) fscache nfs_acl sunrpc ib_iser rdma_cm ib_cm iw_cm ib_sa ib_mad ib_core ib_addr iscsi_tcp libiscsi scsi_transport_iscsi dm_mirror dm_multipath scsi_dh video hwmon backlight sbs i2c_ec button battery asus_acpi acpi_memhotplug ac lp floppy sg pcspkr i2c_piix4 i2c_core pcnet32 mii parport_pc parport shpchp serio_raw dm_raid45 dm_message dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod dm_mem_cache ata_piix libata mptspi mptscsih mptbase scsi_transport_spi sd_mod scsi_mod ext3 jbd uhci_hcd ohci_hcd ehci_hcd Pid: 18655, comm: mknod01 Tainted: P 2.6.18-128.el5 #1 RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8844841d>] [<ffffffff8844841d>] :nfs:encode_share_access+0x6d/0x82 RSP: 0018:ffff81000d4cdb18 EFLAGS: 00010297 RAX: 00000000ffffffff RBX: ffff810007c770b8 RCX: ffff810007c770b8 RDX: 0000000000000008 RSI: 0000000000000008 RDI: ffff81000d4cdb68 RBP: 0000000000000080 R08: ffff810007c770ac R09: 0000000000000009 R10: ffff81000601e980 R11: ffffffff8844bc69 R12: ffff81000d4cdb68 R13: ffff81000216d158 R14: ffff81000d4cde18 R15: ffff810002912000 FS: 00002b7f2d2c3210(0000) GS:ffffffff803ac000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000003ec6a41900 CR3: 0000000007c10000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 Process mknod01 (pid: 18655, threadinfo ffff81000d4cc000, task ffff810004308040) Stack: ffff810004308040 ffff810007c770b0 ffff81000834f408 ffffffff8844b919 ffff8100080b7df8 ffff81000216d158 ffff81000834f408 ffffffff8844bc69 ffff81000216d158 ffffffff8844bcd6 ffff810007c770c0 ffff81000216d160 Call Trace: [<ffffffff8844b919>] :nfs:encode_open+0x66/0x33e [<ffffffff8844bc69>] :nfs:nfs4_xdr_enc_open+0x0/0xac [<ffffffff8844bcd6>] :nfs:nfs4_xdr_enc_open+0x6d/0xac [<ffffffff8844bc69>] :nfs:nfs4_xdr_enc_open+0x0/0xac [<ffffffff883c63f0>] :sunrpc:call_transmit+0x1bc/0x222 [<ffffffff883cb923>] :sunrpc:__rpc_execute+0x92/0x24e [<ffffffff883cbb36>] :sunrpc:rpc_run_task+0x37/0x3f [<ffffffff884430e0>] :nfs:_nfs4_proc_open+0x50/0x1aa [<ffffffff88443ff2>] :nfs:nfs4_do_open+0xc2/0x1dd [<ffffffff884459a4>] :nfs:nfs4_proc_create+0x7f/0x1b2 [<ffffffff883cc91a>] :sunrpc:rpcauth_lookup_credcache+0x12e/0x24c [<ffffffff8842d3c4>] :nfs:nfs_access_get_cached+0xab/0xfa [<ffffffff8842e440>] :nfs:nfs_create+0x87/0xed [<ffffffff8002221b>] d_alloc+0x174/0x1a9 [<ffffffff8003a031>] vfs_create+0xe6/0x158 [<ffffffff800e3120>] sys_mknodat+0x107/0x188 [<ffffffff8005d229>] tracesys+0x71/0xe0 [<ffffffff8005d28d>] tracesys+0xd5/0xe0 Code: 0f 0b 68 14 5e 45 88 c2 68 03 c7 03 00 00 00 00 41 5a 5b 5d RIP [<ffffffff8844841d>] :nfs:encode_share_access+0x6d/0x82 RSP <ffff81000d4cdb18> <0>Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception I think open_flags was set to be zero when calling encode_share_access(), but I don't know what happened and triggered this crash. is anyone willing to help me ? Best, sid

3 2

a strange (new?) feature in rhel-6
by Farkas Levente 31 Jul '10

31 Jul '10

hi, i'm just accidentally recognize that on rhel-6: ---------------------------------------------- # rpm -qpi rhnsd-4.9.3-2.el6.x86_64.rpm warning: rhnsd-4.9.3-2.el6.x86_64.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA256 signature: NOKEY, key ID f21541eb Name : rhnsd Relocations: (not relocatable) Version : 4.9.3 Vendor: Red Hat, Inc. Release : 2.el6 Build Date: Wed 24 Mar 2010 03:11:14 PM CET Install Date: (not installed) Build Host: ls20-bc2-13.build.redhat.com Group : System Environment/Base Source RPM: rhnsd-4.9.3-2.el6.src.rpm Size : 92865 License: GPLv2 Signature : RSA/8, Tue 20 Apr 2010 07:50:37 PM CEST, Key ID 938a80caf21541eb Packager : Red Hat, Inc. <http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla> URL : https://fedorahosted.org/spacewalk Summary : CentOS Network query daemon Description : The CentOS Update Agent that automatically queries the CentOS Network servers and determines which packages need to be updated on your machine, and runs any actions. ---------------------------------------------- did you see the strange thing? (i run ths command on a centos system) so if centos just rebuild the same src.rpm then do not need to modify the package and the spec! (ok this pacakge won't be included in centos anyway, just an example) since in that case the buildhost and vendor changed because of the build system and the summary and other part will change "automagically" even if the spec file contains _hard coded_ "Red Hat". this can save same useless work.. just my 2c. -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"

6 6

Missing security updates
by Ned Slider 29 Jul '10

29 Jul '10

Any news on the pending security updates? http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=4433 Thanks.

17 67

tracking ABI changes in C/C++ libraries
by Andrey Ponomarenko 24 Jul '10

24 Jul '10

Hello, Colleagues! The new service for tracking ABI changes in various C/C++ libraries is now available for Linux distribution maintainers and upstream developers - "Upstream Tracker". It may be helpful for analyzing risks of libraries updating in the CentOS and other systems. The service includes more than 100 libraries at the moment: OpenSSL, ALSA, glib, cairo, libssh, fontconfig etc. The service is freely available at: http://linuxtesting.org/upstream-tracker/ Suggestions for libraries inclusion and feature/bug requests are very welcome. Thanks! -- Andrey Ponomarenko Linux Verification Center, ISPRAS web: http://www.linuxtesting.org mail: upstream-tracker(a)linuxtesting.org

7 21

[Florian.LaRoche@gmx.net: Re: [rhelv6-beta-list] Can Red Hat provide .nosrc.rpm for quickly download?]
by Florian La Roche 23 Jul '10

23 Jul '10

Hello all, wouldn't a git repo be also good for security updates to quickly see the changes of all security updates going out? This wouldn't have to be a repo developers work from, but a "shadow read-only" repo that is generated automatically from the source rpm packages. It could even be one big repo with RHEL, Oracle Linux, CentOS, Scientific Linux in it to show all flavours out there. regards, Florian La Roche ----- Forwarded message from Florian La Roche <Florian.LaRoche(a)gmx.net> ----- From: Florian La Roche <Florian.LaRoche(a)gmx.net> To: "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 (Santiago) Beta releases discussion mailing-list" <rhelv6-beta-list(a)redhat.com> Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 06:48:50 +0200 Subject: Re: [rhelv6-beta-list] Can Red Hat provide .nosrc.rpm for quickly download? > Can Red Hat provide .nosrc.rpm for quickly download? Hello Kirby, Even better would be a git repository, then you'd also immediately see the changes and have an RSS feed of it. regards, Florian La Roche _______________________________________________ rhelv6-beta-list mailing list rhelv6-beta-list(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv6-beta-list ----- End forwarded message -----

3 2

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel