devel

devel@lists.centos.org

1 participants
4619 discussions

DRBD 8.3.9
by Ralph Angenendt 15 Nov '10

15 Nov '10

Hi, there are new drbd83-8.3.9 packages available in the testing repository (4 and 5, i386 and x86_64), if you want to try them out. There shouldn't be a problem to drop those in as a replacement to older drbd83 packages. Regards, Ralph

6 11

where did you get the optional packages?
by Farkas Levente 12 Nov '10

12 Nov '10

hi, as rhel-6 release my old question arise again. from where did you get the optional packages' src.rpms? eg: a2ps-4.14-10.1.el6 is included in all of this channel: RHEL Client Optional (v. 6 for 32-bit x86) RHEL Client Optional (v. 6 for 64-bit x86_64) RHEL Server Optional (v. 6 64-bit x86_64) RHEL Server Optional (v. 6 for 32-bit x86) RHEL Workstation Optional (v. 6 for 32-bit x86) RHEL Workstation Optional (v. 6 for x86_64) but this packages (with many other optional packages) can't be find on redhat's ftp server (or at least i can't find it). can you tell me from where the centos team legally download this packages' src.rpm? thanks in advance. regards. -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"

3 3

Artwork for C6
by Karanbir Singh 07 Nov '10

07 Nov '10

Hi, with the EL6beta2 Refresh, I am going to guess that the rhel6 release isnt far - and one of the things that takes the longest to get sorted out in 'CentOS Lands' is the artwork components. It would be fantastic if we can get some of the centos-artwork packages into the testing repo's by the 15th Aug. So what all do we need in order to get there ? The components we need to start with are the gnome theme, *-artwork packages and *-logos packages. Can we also get a show of hands, on who all are working on these components ? Thanks - KB

21 58

About Centos6
by Yoinier Hernandez Nieves 03 Nov '10

03 Nov '10

How I can obtain centos 6 to try?? Jigdo for example. Regards. Thanks. -- Yoinier Hernández Nieves. Administrador de Redes. Nodo Provincial Teico Las Tunas.

3 3

broken redhat-artwork-5.1.0-32.el5.centos ?
by Manuel Wolfshant 24 Oct '10

24 Oct '10

hello While playing with the freshly installed yum-3.2.27-12, I ran across this: [wolfy@wolfy2 ~]$ sudo yum -y update --enablerepo=c5-testing Loaded plugins: allowdowngrade, changelog, downloadonly, fastestmirror, merge-conf Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile Setting up Update Process Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package redhat-artwork.x86_64 0:5.1.0-32.el5.centos set to be updated --> Finished Dependency Resolution Dependencies Resolved =========================================================================================================================== Package Arch Version Repository Size =========================================================================================================================== Updating: redhat-artwork x86_64 5.1.0-32.el5.centos c5-testing 7.0 M Transaction Summary =========================================================================================================================== Install 0 Package(s) Upgrade 1 Package(s) Total size: 7.0 M Downloading Packages: Running rpm_check_debug Running Transaction Test Transaction Check Error: file /usr/share/gdm/themes/TreeFlower/background.png from install of redhat-artwork-5.1.0-32.el5.centos.x86_64 conflicts with file from package redhat-logos-4.9.99-11.el5.centos.noarch file /usr/share/gdm/themes/TreeFlower/screenshot.png from install of redhat-artwork-5.1.0-32.el5.centos.x86_64 conflicts with file from package redhat-logos-4.9.99-11.el5.centos.noarch Error Summary ------------- [wolfy@wolfy2 ~]$ rpm -qa redhat\* redhat-rpm-config-8.0.45-32.el5.centos.noarch redhat-menus-6.7.8-3.el5.noarch redhat-logos-4.9.99-11.el5.centos.noarch redhat-artwork-5.1.0-28.el5.centos.x86_64

2 6

EL6 and larger than DVD install media
by Karanbir Singh 22 Oct '10

22 Oct '10

hi, I am guessing most people have looked at the larger-than-DVD install tree's in the shape of the 'base' and 'optional' repos in rhel6-beta. When it comes to us doing the tree's there are a couple of options, one of which might be to stick with 'base' and 'optional' repositories. But I am fairly sure that Red Hat will productise their tree's into the various varients ( Workstation, Server, Cluster Suite etc ) and drop the 'optional' repo to make things look a lot more like the EL5 tree's. Since we mix all the tree's into one - that creates the issue we have with 5.5/x86_64/DVD1 and DVD2. Not ideal. I have a couple of ideas on this, but would like to hear what everyone else thinks is the best way to handle this. Keep in mind that we want to try to ensure that all kickstart / tools / code written for RHEL should justwork on CentOS ( well, as much as is possible ). - KB

7 13

Updated docs on http://www.centos.org/docs
by Fabian Arrotin 18 Oct '10

18 Oct '10

Hi all, I've seen too much people being redirected to www.centos.org/docs while asking something specific in the #centos channel, and sometimes it will fail, just because those people ask for example details about kvm and that kvm isn't included in the 5.2 virtualization guide that is hosted on the centos server. What does need to be done to include newer doc on www.centos.org/docs, that is in-line with the docs available upstream ? For example , i see that Johnny just removed a s"hadow man logo" in the header and a "red hat documentation" link+icon He also added a kind of 'disclaimer' in the footer. Is there something else to be done ? If i consider the 5.5 technical notes that are on the centos docs server, i still see a "shadow man" logo on the first page ... -- -- Fabian Arrotin

3 8

yum-3.2.27 in c5-testing
by Karanbir Singh 12 Oct '10

12 Oct '10

hi, yum-3.2.27-12 based on James's build of yum from EL6 on EL5 is now available on the c5-testing repo. Feel free to give it a shot and feedback is very welcome - even if its a case of 'it works'. There is quite a list of changes from 3.2.22-26 to 3.2.27-12, you can get an overview here : http://yum.baseurl.org/wiki/releases Regards, - KB

2 1

Updated nx/freenx packages
by Akemi Yagi 04 Oct '10

04 Oct '10

CentOS devs (perhaps Tru?), I have an updated version of nx/freenx ready. The srpms are: http://centos.toracat.org/misc/nx-freenx/5/SRPMS/freenx-0.7.3-6.el5.centos.… http://centos.toracat.org/misc/nx-freenx/5/SRPMS/nx-3.4.0-6.el5.centos.ay.s… Two tarballs (nxagent and nx-X11) in nx have been update to the current version (as of Sept 2010). One main change done in this update is addition of support for RHEL6(beta). For example, rpmbuild -bb --target x86_64 --define 'dist .el6.centos' --define "centos_ver 6" freenx.spec will build the x86_64 version of freenx for RHEL/CentOS-6. Anyone wishing to give them a try can find the binaries at: http://centos.toracat.org/misc/nx-freenx/6/i386/ http://centos.toracat.org/misc/nx-freenx/6/x86_64/ I have tested them against RHEL 6 beta2 and they seem to work fine. Thanks, Akemi

3 8

Forums migration to phpbb
by Karanbir Singh 01 Oct '10

01 Oct '10

Starting a new thread... So there are a few things that need to be done with the forums : - Workable data migration path from the existing forums setup to phpbb - setup a single authentication module with its own account creation / deletion / admin interface - Migrating the wiki, bugs and www site to use the same auth mechanism. Things already done : + phpbb install and tested migration ( I am guessing this based on Marcus's last email ) Looking at the list of things that need to be done, I dont need to be or want to be involved with any of them, but am happy to project-manage if that is something which is needed. So, who's offering to do what ? Step-1 might be to check and verify that wiki/bugs/www can be migrated to using the ldap auth setup proposed for phpbb. - KB

6 15

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel