Discuss November 2012

discuss@lists.centos.org

126 participants
132 discussions

who's in charge of the fortune d/b?
by m.roth＠5-cent.us 30 Nov '12

30 Nov '12

I haven't found who does it for RHEL/CentOS yet, and there's a wrong attribution.... --------------------- Fortune Begin ------------------------ I'm N-ary the tree, I am, N-ary the tree, I am, I am. I'm getting traversed by the parser next door, She's traversed me seven times before. And ev'ry time it was an N-ary (N-ary!) Never wouldn't ever do a binary. (No sir!) I'm 'er eighth tree that was N-ary. N-ary the tree I am, I am, N-ary the tree I am. -- Stolen from Paul Revere and the Raiders Hermans' Hermits. Paul Revere and the Raiders never did it.... mark "somewhere, somebody on the 'Net said something wrong!"

4 5

Re: [CentOS] centos 6.3 live-cd no internet connection
by Johan Scheepers 30 Nov '12

30 Nov '12

On 30/11/2012 08:37, Sorin Srbu wrote: > -----Original Message----- > From: centos-bounces(a)centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf > Of Johan Scheepers > Sent: den 28 november 2012 08:10 > To: centos > Subject: [CentOS] centos 6.3 live-cd no internet connection > >> Installed Centos 6.3 live-cd. Looking good but * no internet >> connection * (wired dsl system). > Did you check the "Automatically connect"-check box in the network manager for > you connection? > > If you've done a plain vanilla install and didn't look at the network settings > at install time, odds are that this checkbox is unchecked. > > HTH. > > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS(a)centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Thanks for your reply... On install there was a option at left hand bottom for Internet connection on some page. It was grayed out and had no effect on clicking. Where would this be found, please... "Automatically connect"-check box in the network manager for you connection? What would this mean.. plain vanilla install Clean re-install would be no problem for me to get this going. I spend a lot of bandwidth (live-cd, netinstall, DVD1, DVD2) and time until now. Kindly some advice to look for while installing and directly afterwards, please. Thanks JohanS

2 1

centos 6.3 live-cd no internet connection
by Johan Scheepers 30 Nov '12

30 Nov '12

Good day, Installed Centos 6.3 live-cd. Looking good but * no internet connection * (wired dsl system). Other linux flavours do not seem to have this problem on my laptop and internet connection. Did a lot of google but not really advice that I could try. I would like to try Centos out but not able to proceed without connection. Kindly some detailed advice if possible. Thanks JohanS

3 2

Upgrading from Centos 6.2 64 bit to Centos 6.3 64 bit
by centos wiki 30 Nov '12

30 Nov '12

Hello: I am new to Centos. I installed Centos 6.2 64 bit and want to upgrade to centos 6.3 64 bit without losing my current settings. Any help?

2 1

Re: [CentOS] What's The Odds?
by Gene Poole 29 Nov '12

29 Nov '12

Several reasons to rebuild the box: The software to be tested requires a physical server. This is our Sand Box machine, but over time 'we' have been using it as a repository for various things. We can't get another IP address for a VM this time of the year. So much easier to just stick our custom 'offline' build DVD and change the channel in the Satellite server. Thanks, Gene Poole

3 2

Re: [CentOS] apache, passenger, and selinux
by m.roth＠5-cent.us 29 Nov '12

29 Nov '12

Miroslav Grepl wrote: > On 11/29/2012 08:00 PM, m.roth(a)5-cent.us wrote: >> Daniel J Walsh wrote: >>> On 11/28/2012 04:22 PM, m.roth(a)5-cent.us wrote: >>>> Daniel J Walsh wrote: >>>>> On 11/28/2012 03:18 PM, m.roth(a)5-cent.us wrote: >>>>>> I seem to have quieted some, but I'm still getting noise from >>>>>> selinux. Here's one that really puzzles me: my users have a ruby app with >>>>>> passenger running. However, one of the sealerts gives me: sealert -l >>>>>> 5a02b0a1-8512-4f71-b1c8-70a40b090a9d SELinux is preventing >>>>>> /bin/chmod from using the fowner capability. >>>>>> >>>>>> ***** Plugin catchall_boolean (89.3 confidence) suggests >>>>>> ******************* >>>>>> >>>>>> If you want to allow Apache to run in stickshift mode, not >>>>>> transition >>>>>> to passenger Then you must tell SELinux about this by enabling the >>>>>> 'httpd_run_stickshift' boolean.You can read 'httpd_selinux' man page >>>>>> for more details. Do setsebool -P httpd_run_stickshift 1 <...> >>>>>> >>>>>> Is there a boolean I'm missing, or are they doing something wrong? >>>>>> Clues for the poor appreciated. >>>>>> >>>>> Have you turned on this boolean? And did it quiet the AVC's. >>>> I have not. The reason I'm asking is that I was thinking that it *did* >>>> want to transition to passenger, and was hoping for a clue as to why >>>> it was doing this, rather than make the transition. I've asked the lead >>>> developer, who had no clue. >>>> >>>> The original lead developer left early this year, IIRC. >>>> >>> I am not sure. Of course are the passenger programs properly labeled >>> as >>> passenger_exec_t? >> I just tried. I'm on CentOS 6.3, and get >> semanage fcontext -a -t passenger_exec_t >> "/opt/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/passenger-3.0.15/bin/*" >> libsepol.context_from_record: type passenger_exec_t is not defined (No >> such file or directory). >> libsepol.context_from_record: could not create context structure >> (Invalid >> argument). >> libsemanage.validate_handler: invalid context >> system_u:object_r:passenger_exec_t:s0 specified for >> /opt/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/passenger-3.0.15/bin/* [all files] >> (Invalid argument). >> libsemanage.dbase_llist_iterate: could not iterate over records (Invalid >> argument). >> /usr/sbin/semanage: Could not commit semanage transaction >> > What does > > # rpm -q selinux-policy selinux-policy-3.7.19-155.el6_3.8.noarch > > # seinfo -t |grep passenger > Nothing. mark

1 0

apache, passenger, and selinux
by m.roth＠5-cent.us 29 Nov '12

29 Nov '12

I seem to have quieted some, but I'm still getting noise from selinux. Here's one that really puzzles me: my users have a ruby app with passenger running. However, one of the sealerts gives me: sealert -l 5a02b0a1-8512-4f71-b1c8-70a40b090a9d SELinux is preventing /bin/chmod from using the fowner capability. ***** Plugin catchall_boolean (89.3 confidence) suggests ******************* If you want to allow Apache to run in stickshift mode, not transition to passenger Then you must tell SELinux about this by enabling the 'httpd_run_stickshift' boolean.You can read 'httpd_selinux' man page for more details. Do setsebool -P httpd_run_stickshift 1 <...> Is there a boolean I'm missing, or are they doing something wrong? Clues for the poor appreciated. mark

2 4

CentOS version for sparc
by Amy Tran 29 Nov '12

29 Nov '12

Hello there, I'd like to have iso image version for ultra sparc 64bit. Recently, I downloaded centos version 4.2 beta iso image and installed on SunUltra sparc 64 bit machine. It was hang when it went to the screen " the CentOS 4.2 beta screen, <Tab>/<Alt tab> | <Space> selects | <F12> next screen ". Any idea? Please help. Thanks in advance. Amy on your options page that will email your current password to you.

4 3

ldap_bind parse result: Decoding error (-4).
by Kaushal Shriyan 29 Nov '12

29 Nov '12

Hi, Any clue about this error "/usr/bin/ldapadd -x -W -D "cn=root,dc=mydomain,dc=com" -f ./base.ldif I get ldap_bind parse result: Decoding error (-4). " Regards, Kaushal

2 2

How to disable ipv6
by Charles Bearden 28 Nov '12

28 Nov '12

Hi all, I'm pretty new to CentOS. I am working with a newly set-up server: [cbearden@host ~]$ lsb_release -a LSB Version: :core-4.0-amd64:core-4.0-noarch:graphics-4.0-amd64:graphics-4.0-noarch:printing-4.0-amd64:printing-4.0-noarch Distributor ID: CentOS Description: CentOS release 6.3 (Final) Release: 6.3 Codename: Final I'm trying to solve this problem (X11 forwarding) http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.centos.general/119342/focus=119347 for myself. But disabling ipv6 and adding AddressFamily inet to my sshd config didn't fix the problem. Oddly enough, the output of netstat -an suggests that ipv6 is still enabled: tcp 0 0 :::22 :::* LISTEN even though [cbearden@PostgreSQL ~]$ cat /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/all/disable_ipv6 1 This is after a reboot. Am I right that the /proc file suggests that ipv6 is disabled while netstat suggests that it isn't? Thanks, Chuck -- Chuck Bearden Programmer Analyst IV The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Biomedical Informatics Email: Charles.F.Bearden(a)uth.tmc.edu Phone: 713.500.9672

4 4

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss November 2012