Discuss November 2022

discuss@lists.centos.org

20 participants
12 discussions

Apache mpm itk
by Gionatan Danti 17 May '23

17 May '23

Hi all, the EPEL repository for CentOS7 contains httpd-itk, an apache module for running different vhosts under specific user/group ID. For RHEL8 I can find it only in 3rd party repos, while I misses it entirely for RHEL9. Is the module deprecated? Can it be re-included into EPEL? Regards. -- Danti Gionatan Supporto Tecnico Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it email: g.danti(a)assyoma.it - info(a)assyoma.it GPG public key ID: FF5F32A8

2 3

Re: [CentOS] Trouble with kernel-3.10.0-1160.80.1.el7.x86_64
by Petko Alov 11 Mar '23

11 Mar '23

> > On 2022-11-08 15:49, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > On 11/8/22 13:12, Simon Matter wrote: > > Is anyone else experiencing trouble with > kernel-3.10.0-1160.80.1.el7.x86_64? > > I'm seeing a kernel panics in the kvm module on one of our VM hosts with > > it. > > I did notice a new libvirt update as well, but it seems to work fine with > > the > older kernel (.76.1). > > Where did you get the .80.1 kernel from? I'm a bit confused because I can > > only see .76.1 on my systems. > > Simon > > I'm actually running Scientific Linux, which seems to be a little ahead here. > > Probably not related, but vmlinuz-4.18.0-372.32.1.el8_6.x86_64 (AlmaLinux 8.6) had a kernel panic > on a Intel Xeon E5504 processor, but works fine on Xeon E56XX processors (5620 specifically in our > tests). * Believe from kernel version, the original email is for Centos 7, possible the same > change that went into the EL8 kernel went also to EL7 Triggered right after I used virsh start to > start the vm. (Caused Black Screen, and reboot. Found this in the crashed kernel logs on > /var/crash) Works fine on vmlinuz-4.18.0-372.26.1.el8_6.x86_64 and > vmlinuz-4.18.0-372.16.1.el8_6.x86_64 In fact, related - on our systems attempt to start qemu-kvm VM under kernel-3.10.0-1160.80.1.el7.x86_64 freezes any of 5 workstations with dual E5507 (all worked OK under kernel-3.10.0-1160.76.1.el7.x86_64 and any previous version). The workstations with E5-2609, E5-2650 or E5-2630 are not affected - all of them run qemu-kvm VM under kernel-3.10.0-1160.80.1.el7.x86_64 without problems. Any ideas? Regards, Petko -- Petko Alov Department of QSAR & Molecular Modelling Institute of Biophysics and Biomedical Engineering, BAS 21 G. Bontchev Str 1113 Sofia, BULGARIA

4 5

EPEL future model
by Leon Fauster 23 Nov '22

23 Nov '22

JFI: https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/epel-10-proposal/44304 -- Leon

1 0

CentOS 7: Missing Thunderbird Updates
by Chris Schanzle 21 Nov '22

21 Nov '22

Hi, Looks like CentOS 7 hasn't shipped Thunderbird updates for a while. The latest I see in repos is: Sep 1 15:22 thunderbird-91.13.0-1.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm Perusing through the RHEL announcements, that was from the RHSA-2022:6169-01 on 2022-08-24. Seems none of the 102.x versions have shipped: 2022-09-26 RHSA-2022:6710-01 thunderbird-102.3.0-3.el7_9.x86_64.rpm 2022-10-18 RHSA-2022:6998-01 thunderbird-102.3.0-4.el7_9.x86_64.rpm 2022-10-25 RHSA-2022:7184-01 thunderbird-102.4.0-1.el7_9.x86_64.rpm And for completeness, just announced today: 2022-11-21 RHSA-2022:8555-01 thunderbird-102.5.0-2.el7_9.x86_64.rpm Thanks in advance for efforts to find and clear the blockage!

1 0

CentOS 9 Stream mirrorlist url's
by Jos Vos 19 Nov '22

19 Nov '22

Hi, I'm trying to port a CentOS 8 Stream kickstart file to CentOS 9 Stream, but I cannot find what repo mirrorlist url's I now have to use. For CentOS 8 Stream I had: repo --name=centos-baseos --mirrorlist=http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=8-stream&arch=x86_64&repo=BaseOS repo --name=centos-appstream --mirrorlist=http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=8-stream&arch=x86_64&repo=AppStream repo --name=centos-extras --mirrorlist=http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=8-stream&arch=x86_64&repo=Extras repo --name=centos-powertools --mirrorlist=http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=8-stream&arch=x86_64&repo=PowerTools Just replacing the 8 by 9 does not work, as those url's produce an "Invalid release/repo/arch combination" error. UNfortunately I couldn't find info about this on the CentOS site so far. Thanks in advance, -- -- Jos Vos <jos(a)xos.nl> -- X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV | Office: +31 20 6938364 -- Amsterdam, The Netherlands | Mobile: +31 6 26216181

2 1

Install PHP 8.1.12 on CentOS Linux release 7.9.2009 (Core).
by Kaushal Shriyan 19 Nov '22

19 Nov '22

Hi, I am running CentOS Linux release 7.9.2009 (Core). I have enabled both epel and IUS repositories to install https://www.php.net/ChangeLog-8.php#8.1.12. It is not available. Do I need to install and enable any other repository to install PHP 8.1.12? #php -v PHP 8.1.12 (cli) (built: Oct 25 2022 17:30:00) (NTS gcc x86_64) Copyright (c) The PHP Group Zend Engine v4.1.12, Copyright (c) Zend Technologies with Zend OPcache v8.1.12, Copyright (c), by Zend Technologies Please guide me. Thanks in advance. Best Regards, Kaushal

4 5

nvme fs block size advice
by Adrian Sevcenco 18 Nov '22

18 Nov '22

Hi! So, i have nvme which reports the following (lsblk -t): NAME ALIGNMENT MIN-IO OPT-IO PHY-SEC LOG-SEC ROTA SCHED RQ-SIZE RA WSAME nvme0n1 0 131072 131072 32768 4096 0 none 1023 256 0B the nvme ns is formated with LBA=1 (4k) option (which is the second option after 512) but both lsblk and parted report sector size logical/physical as 4k/32k The question is : what block size should i use (is optimal) for file-system? Should i try a 32k blocksize? Thanks a lot! Adrian

1 0

Trouble with kernel-3.10.0-1160.80.1.el7.x86_64
by Orion Poplawski 10 Nov '22

10 Nov '22

Is anyone else experiencing trouble with kernel-3.10.0-1160.80.1.el7.x86_64? I'm seeing a kernel panics in the kvm module on one of our VM hosts with it. I did notice a new libvirt update as well, but it seems to work fine with the older kernel (.76.1). -- Orion Poplawski IT Systems Manager 720-772-5637 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane orion(a)nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 https://www.nwra.com/

3 3

set default permission to deployuser:deployuser for nfs common mount point /mnt/test
by Kaushal Shriyan 09 Nov '22

09 Nov '22

Hi, I am running two GCP GCE VM instances running CentOS Linux release 7.9.2009 (Core) behind https load balancer. I am using https://cloud.google.com/filestore#documentation to mount the nfs server common mount point to both client servers. #mount 10.0.0.2:/vol1 /mnt/test I did chown -Rc deployuser:deployuser (user:group) /mnt/test. When the php code uploads any file to the /mnt/test folder, the file permission is owned by php-fpm:php-fpm (user:group) Please guide and let me know how to set it to the default permissions of deployuser:deployuser (user:group) for all files and folders created in nfs server common point /mnt/test. Thanks in advance. Best Regards, Kaushal

4 10

Re: [CentOS] LibreOffice on CentOS 7
by jefflpost＠twc.com 04 Nov '22

04 Nov '22

Sorry, my misunderstanding. The version I gave is the version of CentOS7, the version of LibreOffice is 5.3.6.1-25.el7_9. -----------------------------------------From: "Pete Geenhuizen" To: "CentOS mailing list", "H" Cc: Sent: Thursday November 3 2022 7:52:59AM Subject: Re: [CentOS] LibreOffice on CentOS 7 Why not simply download the latest and greatest version LibreOffice from their we site I've been doing that for several years on both Centos 7 and now Rocky 8 and it has worked without fail. On 11/3/22 10:46, H wrote: > On 11/02/2022 03:53 PM,jefflpost(a)twc.com wrote: >> 3.10.0-1160.76.1.el7.x86_64. I check for updates every day. >> >> Jeff >> >> -----------------------------------------From: "H" >> To: "CentOS mailing list" >> Cc: >> Sent: Wednesday November 2 2022 6:28:52AM >> Subject: Re: [CentOS] LibreOffice on CentOS 7 >> >> On November 1, 2022 5:13:49 PM EDT, Josh Boyer wrote: >> >On Tue, Nov 1, 2022, 5:05 PM H wrote: >> > >> >> I am running the default version of LibreOffice 5.3.6.1 on CentOS >> 7. >> >This >> >> is quite an old version and has a serious bug in Calc, possibly an >> >errant >> >> pointer, that frequently locks up spreadsheets. >> >> >> >> Has anyone installed a later version of LO on CentOS 7? I would >> >prefer a >> >> version that is not flatpak, snap or appimage etc... >> >> >> > >> >Could you elaborate why you would like to avoid those packaging >> >formats? >> > >> >josh >> >_______________________________________________ >> >CentOS mailing list >> >CentOS(a)centos.org >> >https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos /> >> /> >> A general dislike of anything that gets between the operating system >> and an application potentially introducing its own complications. >> >> Does anyone happen to know what the latest native version for CentOS >> 7 is? >> _______________________________________________ >> CentOS mailing list >> CentOS(a)centos.org >> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos /> >> /> >> _______________________________________________ >> CentOS mailing list >> CentOS(a)centos.org >> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos /> > That seems to be version 3.10.0, or? As I wrote, I am running 5.3.6.1... > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS(a)centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos /> > -- Unencumbered by the thought process. -- Click and Clack the Tappet brothers _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS(a)centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos />

2 1

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss November 2022