Discuss May 2012

discuss@lists.centos.org

193 participants
201 discussions

Create Virtual Machine via HTTP or FTP
by cbulist＠gmail.com 08 Jun '14

08 Jun '14

Hi, I'm trying to create a Virtual Machine using Network Install mode (I tried HTTP and FTP). The HTTP/FTP server where the installation files are located is the Host Machine. The URL that I'm using is: http://192.168.1.104/inst and the Automatic detect option detects the OS without problem. When the installation starts I got an error: Unable to retrieve http://192.168.1.104/inst/images/install.img I tried different path but I always get the same error. The host machine is a Centos 6.2 (2.6.32.-220.el6.x86_64) I really appreciate any help with this problem. Thanks in advance,

5 7

Building CentOS 6.2 custom install media
by Daniel Drake 14 Sep '13

14 Sep '13

Hi, For the OLPC school server ("XS") we are planning to move from our dated F9 setup to CentOS 6.2. Thanks for all the effort involved in producing this distro. One important part of this project is a 'respin' of the install media - we need to add a handful of packages from external repositories, and maybe run a command late in the install. Are the scripts/configurations used to produce the CentOS official CD/DVDs available? I guess this would be our most reliable/sensible starting point. I am familiar with pungi, kickstart, anaconda, etc, so just a simple git link would be enough to get me started. Thanks, Daniel

5 7

Re: [CentOS] sieveshell fails to start on CentOS 6.0
by Devin Reade 12 Jun '13

12 Jun '13

--On Wednesday, August 10, 2011 01:52:21 PM -0400 Harold Pritchett <harold(a)uga.edu> wrote: > [harold@newmick ~]$ sieveshell localhost > connecting to localhost > unable to connect to server at /usr/bin/sieveshell line 170. Try specifying both --user and --authname as appropriate. sieveshell can be misleading in its error messages, and you may actually have an authentication error rather than a connection error there. You could run it under strace to make sure. Devin

3 2

Virtual Machine Manager error
by Rajagopal Swaminathan 10 Apr '13

10 Apr '13

Greetings, I am getting the following error when I start the Virtual machine manager [root@centos Desktop]# uname -a Linux blah.blah.blah 2.6.32-220.2.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Dec 23 02:21:33 CST 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Error polling connection 'qemu:///system': internal error Cannot find suitable emulator for x86_64 Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/share/virt-manager/virtManager/engine.py", line 440, in _tick conn.tick() File "/usr/share/virt-manager/virtManager/connection.py", line 1414, in tick newNets, self.nets) = self._update_nets() File "/usr/share/virt-manager/virtManager/connection.py", line 1277, in _update_nets lookup_func, build_class) File "/usr/share/virt-manager/virtManager/connection.py", line 1209, in _poll_helper if not check_support(): File "/usr/share/virt-manager/virtManager/connection.py", line 501, in is_network_capable virtinst.support.SUPPORT_CONN_NETWORK) File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/virtinst/support.py", line 574, in check_conn_support return _check_support(conn, feature, conn) File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/virtinst/support.py", line 443, in _check_support actual_drv_ver = _hv_ver(conn, uri) File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/virtinst/support.py", line 376, in _hv_ver ret = cmd(*args) File "/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/libvirt.py", line 2823, in getVersion if ret == -1: raise libvirtError ('virConnectGetVersion() failed', conn=self) libvirtError: internal error Cannot find suitable emulator for x86_64 any clues? TIA -- Regards, Rajagopal

12 17

Building Dovecot CentOS 5 RPMs with custom LDAP packages
by Nikolaos Milas 11 Jan '13

11 Jan '13

Hi, We are (still) mainly using CentOS 5 (5.8 x86_64). As CentOS / EL 5 standard OpenLDAP packages are rather old (2.3.x), we've been using LTB OpenLDAP packages ( http://ltb-project.org/wiki/download#openldap), which get installed in non-standard file system locations. I am not much experienced in building RPMs and preparing spec files. We are currently using dovecot RPM packages from the atrpms repo (http://packages.atrpms.net/dist/el5/dovecot/). I would like to re-build Dovecot packages based on the LTB OpenLDAP RPM packages (OpenLDAP v2.4.x), esp. because I see that ATRPMs Dovecot RPM packages are built using OpenLDAP v2.3 devel code (i.e. standard CentOS OpenLDAP devel packages). In http://dl.atrpms.net/all/dovecot.spec I see: ------------------------------------------------ BuildRequires: openldap-devel, cyrus-sasl-devel ... Obsoletes: %{name}-pgsql < %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}, %{name}-mysql < %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}, %{name}-sqlite < %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}, %{name}-ldap < %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}, $ Conflicts: %{name}-pgsql > %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}, %{name}-mysql > %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}, %{name}-sqlite > %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}, %{name}-ldap > %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}, $ ------------------------------------------------ So, I guess I can/should change the former line to: BuildRequires: openldap-ltb-debuginfo, cyrus-sasl-devel Note: The final Dovecot RPM and the associated executables (included therein) do not need any LDAP dynamic library in order to run with LDAP support; i.e. after building, the produced package does not require any ldap package on the system. Question 1: What other changes/additions should we make in the spec file in order to specify that we will be using (if needed) LDAP libraries from: /usr/local/openldap/lib64 and include files from: /usr/local/openldap/include (rather than from /usr/lib64 and /usr/include, respectively, which are the standard file paths used in native openldap-devel RPM)? Question 2: How the Obsoletes and Conflicts lines should be changed? Any other associated info would be appreciated. Thanks, Nick

2 3

IE 9 not sending digest auth info
by Paul Heinlein 10 Jan '13

10 Jan '13

I migrated our internal wiki server last week, and some IE users aren't able to authenticate. The service is hosted by Apache using Digest authentication. It migrated from Apache 2.2.9 (Debian 5) to Apache 2.2.15 (CentOS 6). The internal hostname for the wiki server is a DNS CNAME that was repointed from one host to another during the cutover. In a normal session, 1. Client sends GET 2. Server sends 401 with WWW-Authenticate header 3. Client sends GET with Authorization header 4. Server sends 200 with Authentication-Info header and page content When using IE 9 (and possibly 8, I'm still trying to track that down), 1. Client sends GET 2. Server sends 401 with WWW-Authenticate header 3. Client resends GET (*without* Authorization header) 4. Server sends 401 with WWW-Authenticate header 5. Etc. IE seems to be ignoring 401 and/or the WWW-Authenticate headers. Using Chrome on Windows works fine; the issues are specific to IE. Any ideas? My google-fu has failed me. -- Paul Heinlein <> heinlein(a)madboa.com <> http://www.madboa.com/

3 4

Re: [CentOS] CONFIG_ARPD turned on in centosplus kernel.
by Akemi Yagi 12 Dec '12

12 Dec '12

On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Steve Clark <sclark(a)netwolves.com> wrote: > On 05/05/2012 04:45 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > > On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Steve Clark <sclark(a)netwolves.com> wrote: > > http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=5709 > > I actually took the latest centosplus kernel srpm and got it going in my > environment (would like to have > semi official support though ;-) ). It has been running stable for a > couple of weeks now. > > I have 4 systems setup using it and opennhrp in a DMVPN hub and spoke > arrangement. > I have 2 hubs with each of the spokes connected to each of the hubs. The > spokes would be units in the field while > the hubs would be at HQ in a failover environment using OSPF amongst them > all. > > I've updated the RFE you filed with some info. Will be nice if you > also add the above note in there. > > Akemi > _______________________________________________ > > Thanks Akemi, > > I am just preparing to test the new kernel. That's great. I closed the bug report thinking there would be no response. I will reopen it so that you can add your test result. Akemi

2 1

3TB usb drive won't mount
by Bent Terp 17 Jul '12

17 Jul '12

Hi list! I have a 3TB usb drive with an NTFS filesystem on it, that I can't mount.: [bent@bnlaptop ~]$ sudo /sbin/mount.ntfs-3g /dev/sdb1 /mnt Failed to read vcn 0xf28: Input/output error Failed to mount '/dev/sdb1': Input/output error NTFS is either inconsistent, or there is a hardware fault, or it's a SoftRAID/FakeRAID hardware. In the first case run chkdsk /f on Windows then reboot into Windows twice. The usage of the /f parameter is very important! If the device is a SoftRAID/FakeRAID then first activate it and mount a different device under the /dev/mapper/ directory, (e.g. /dev/mapper/nvidia_eahaabcc1). Please see the 'dmraid' documentation for more details. On a Win7 machine there are no problems and chkdsk can't find anything wrong with the filesystem. I can mount 1TB drives using ntfs-3g without problems, so the driver doesn't seem to be the issue. I've tried both CentOS6.2 and Fedora16 with the same result. Any suggestions? with kind regards, Bent Terp

5 7

XEN or KVM - performance/stability/security?
by Rafał Radecki 13 Jul '12

13 Jul '12

Hi all. I am currently building a small test cloud based on Eucalyptus 2.0.3 and CentOS 5.8 x64. I have a choice which hypervisor to use: KVM or XEN. KVM is the default in CentOS 6 but I have read also many good things (for example PV guest machines, isolation between Dom0 and DomU) about XEN. Key factors from my opint of view are: - stability (which one runs more smoothly on CentOS?) - performance (XEN PV/HVM(with or without pv drivers) vs KVM HVM(with or without pv drivers)) - security Could you share your experience in these areas? Best regards, Rafal Radecki.

14 31

yum problem with glibc
by Timothy Murphy 08 Jun '12

08 Jun '12

Is anyone getting a yum update problem with glibc and glibc-common? I'm getting the error message ------------------------------- Error: Protected multilib versions: glibc-2.12-1.47.el6_2.12.x86_64 != glibc-2.12-1.47.el6_2.9.i686 ** Found 3 pre-existing rpmdb problem(s), 'yum check' output follows: bash-4.1.2-9.el6_2.x86_64 is a duplicate with bash-4.1.2-8.el6.centos.x86_64 glibc-common-2.12-1.47.el6_2.12.x86_64 is a duplicate with glibc- common-2.12-1.47.el6_2.9.x86_64 glibc-common-2.12-1.47.el6_2.12.x86_64 has missing requires of glibc = ('0', '2.12', '1.47.el6_2.12') ------------------------------- I've tried "rpm --rebuilddb" but that did not seem to help. Any suggestions or advice gratefully received. -- Timothy Murphy e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366 s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College Dublin

6 16

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss May 2012