*New version of chromium (33.0.1750.152)*Build by me :-)i686 chromium-33.0.1750.152-3.el6.i686.rpm https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B9RlkKQB1POSWmFiT0REeG1QS28/ SRPM chromium-33.0.1750.152-3.el6.src.rpm https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B9RlkKQB1POSQlZ1OUljT3p6U1U/
-- View this message in context: http://centos.1050465.n5.nabble.com/CentOS-chromium-33-0-1750-152-3-el6-tp57... Sent from the CentOS mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Is this legit? Anyone try this build?
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 6:03 PM, ngeorgop ngeorgop@gmail.com wrote:
*New version of chromium (33.0.1750.152)*Build by me :-)i686 chromium-33.0.1750.152-3.el6.i686.rpm https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B9RlkKQB1POSWmFiT0REeG1QS28/ SRPM chromium-33.0.1750.152-3.el6.src.rpm https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B9RlkKQB1POSQlZ1OUljT3p6U1U/
-- View this message in context: http://centos.1050465.n5.nabble.com/CentOS-chromium-33-0-1750-152-3-el6-tp57... Sent from the CentOS mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 04/07/2014 06:37 AM, Phelps, Matt wrote:
Is this legit? Anyone try this build?
It is legit in that it seems possible to build via the DevTool Set 1.0 ... and also DevTool Sets 2.0/2.1.:
http://people.centos.org/tru/devtools-2/
There are custom patches in the source code that I have not completely validated and I have also not looked at the flash handling completely in the sources.
I do plan to look at this code a bit more and make it build in mock and not manually out of the chroot ... so I can not currently vouch for it 100%, but it does seem on first blush to be legit.
I do plan on doing some work with this after I get back home from ApacheCon (Denver, Colorado - 7 to 11 April 2014) and Red Hat Summit (San Francisco, CA - 13 to 18 April 2014) ... so likely in 2 weeks. Of course, if I have some free time at those places then I might get it done sooner.
If someone out there wants to validate the source code in the meantime, feel free to do so and post here.
Thanks, Johnny Hughes
New build:
chromium-33.0.1750.152-4.el6.src.rpmhttps://drive.google.com/open?id=0B9RlkKQB1POSWWhvaHhfWlZKd1E
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9RlkKQB1POSWWhvaHhfWlZKd1E
chromium-33.0.1750.152-4.el6.i386.rpmhttps://drive.google.com/open?id=0B9RlkKQB1POSZTF3MWJYOVE1a1E
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9RlkKQB1POSZTF3MWJYOVE1a1E
2014-04-07 16:05 GMT+03:00 Johnny Hughes [via CentOS] < ml-node+s1050465n5725812h10@n5.nabble.com>:
On 04/07/2014 06:37 AM, Phelps, Matt wrote:
Is this legit? Anyone try this build?
It is legit in that it seems possible to build via the DevTool Set 1.0 ... and also DevTool Sets 2.0/2.1.:
http://people.centos.org/tru/devtools-2/
There are custom patches in the source code that I have not completely validated and I have also not looked at the flash handling completely in the sources.
I do plan to look at this code a bit more and make it build in mock and not manually out of the chroot ... so I can not currently vouch for it 100%, but it does seem on first blush to be legit.
I do plan on doing some work with this after I get back home from ApacheCon (Denver, Colorado - 7 to 11 April 2014) and Red Hat Summit (San Francisco, CA - 13 to 18 April 2014) ... so likely in 2 weeks. Of course, if I have some free time at those places then I might get it done sooner.
If someone out there wants to validate the source code in the meantime, feel free to do so and post here.
Thanks, Johnny Hughes
CentOS mailing list [hidden email] http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5725812&i=0 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
*signature.asc* (205 bytes) Download Attachmenthttp://centos.1050465.n5.nabble.com/attachment/5725812/0/signature.asc
If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://centos.1050465.n5.nabble.com/CentOS-chromium-33-0-1750-152-3-el6-tp57... To unsubscribe from [CentOS] chromium-33.0.1750.152-3.el6, click herehttp://centos.1050465.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=5725772&code=bmdlb3Jnb3BAZ21haWwuY29tfDU3MjU3NzJ8ODAwMTY4MDE4 . NAMLhttp://centos.1050465.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml
-- View this message in context: http://centos.1050465.n5.nabble.com/CentOS-chromium-33-0-1750-152-3-el6-tp57... Sent from the CentOS mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 7 April 2014 14:04, Johnny Hughes johnny@centos.org wrote:
On 04/07/2014 06:37 AM, Phelps, Matt wrote:
Is this legit? Anyone try this build?
It is legit in that it seems possible to build via the DevTool Set 1.0 ... and also DevTool Sets 2.0/2.1.:
http://people.centos.org/tru/devtools-2/
There are custom patches in the source code that I have not completely validated and I have also not looked at the flash handling completely in the sources.
I do plan to look at this code a bit more and make it build in mock and not manually out of the chroot ... so I can not currently vouch for it 100%, but it does seem on first blush to be legit.
I do plan on doing some work with this after I get back home from ApacheCon (Denver, Colorado - 7 to 11 April 2014) and Red Hat Summit (San Francisco, CA - 13 to 18 April 2014) ... so likely in 2 weeks. Of course, if I have some free time at those places then I might get it done sooner.
If someone out there wants to validate the source code in the meantime, feel free to do so and post here.
Thanks, Johnny Hughes
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Have you had a chance to verify the legitimacy of these builds Johnny?
There is a newer version available, see:
http://centos.1050465.n5.nabble.com/CentOS-chromium-34-0-1847-132-4-el6-td57...
which is 150% legitimate, meaning it does not contain words such as "flash" , "abobe" etc and builds successfully in mock.
It does not work although with flash-plugin that adobe provides for el6 (11.2.202.xxx) I believe this plugin is build against gtk2, and it does not support aurora builds.
From chromium v.34 and on, it is not possible to build chromium against
el6's gtk2. Only aurora builds are possible, like the above.
So, chromium v.33 is the last version that cooperates with flash-plugin provided for el6.
Greetings,
ngeorg
-- View this message in context: http://centos.1050465.n5.nabble.com/CentOS-chromium-33-0-1750-152-3-el6-tp57... Sent from the CentOS mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Am 07.04.2014 um 15:04 schrieb Johnny Hughes johnny@centos.org:
On 04/07/2014 06:37 AM, Phelps, Matt wrote:
Is this legit? Anyone try this build?
It is legit in that it seems possible to build via the DevTool Set 1.0 ... and also DevTool Sets 2.0/2.1.:
http://people.centos.org/tru/devtools-2/
There are custom patches in the source code that I have not completely validated and I have also not looked at the flash handling completely in the sources.
I do plan to look at this code a bit more and make it build in mock and not manually out of the chroot ... so I can not currently vouch for it 100%, but it does seem on first blush to be legit.
I do plan on doing some work with this after I get back home from ApacheCon (Denver, Colorado - 7 to 11 April 2014) and Red Hat Summit (San Francisco, CA - 13 to 18 April 2014) ... so likely in 2 weeks. Of course, if I have some free time at those places then I might get it done sooner.
If someone out there wants to validate the source code in the meantime, feel free to do so and post here.
did you known about this
http://install.linux.ncsu.edu/pub/yum/itecs/public/chromium/rhel6/
they use some sort of the SCL approach ...
-- LF
-
Cian Mc Govern -
Johnny Hughes -
Leon Fauster -
ngeorgop -
Phelps, Matt